Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Same old mistakes
Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer

Submitted by Rebecca Moulds (United States), Aug 4, 2008 at 09:11

It is a shame to our country that we have ever caved in to appeasement. The article "Kuwait's Terrorism Policy Sets an Example" (1986) is one point.; the other article which concerns the "lopsided deal" (DanielPipes.org, Feb. 3, 2004 Hezbollahs's Victory, Israel's Decline) not only shows that appeasement doesn't promote peace, but indicates that Daniel Pipes has always voiced his opinions, that we are free to express not only opinions but facts, and that Dr. Pipes is only saying what most aware people are thinking, but are not making known publicly.

Since all is fair in love and war, then it is fair to criticise Israel when criticism is needed----Israel should not be given special dispensation over any other country. Kudos to Daniel Pipes for standing firm against appeasement and for not caving in to the critics who would silence him.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
Israel downhill slide [100 words]Gregory SmithSep 15, 2008 11:29
Who is Schweizer? [77 words]AzrielAug 19, 2008 12:53
To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer [122 words]huckAug 6, 2008 07:56
Disagree with you Huck [165 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:53
Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you [138 words]huckAug 13, 2008 06:02
Thanks Huck- Deeply Appreciated. [29 words]YnnatchkahAug 13, 2008 14:50
Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. [274 words]YnnatchkahAug 15, 2008 00:36
Interesting thoughts Ynnatchkah [115 words]huckAug 15, 2008 23:14
I liked a lot your commentary, especially the following part: [344 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 20:02
Sound bite not so bad [56 words]Archimedes2Aug 6, 2008 01:03
Yes. The Sound Byte [47 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:43
good job Daniel Pipes [104 words]Yuval BrandstetterAug 5, 2008 00:25
How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position? [313 words]Ken BesigAug 4, 2008 14:04
Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? [298 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 21:07
About sound bites and bytes [134 words]G.VishvasAug 4, 2008 09:24
⇒ Same old mistakes [141 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 4, 2008 09:11
Yoram does spell his intentions...In my opinion.... [866 words]YnnatchkahAug 4, 2008 03:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page