Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you
Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer
in response to reader comment: Disagree with you Huck

Submitted by huck (United Kingdom), Aug 13, 2008 at 06:02

First, I think that Daniel Pipes is doing a hugely important job, and his analyses are some of the clearest and bravest that there are today.

I agree with you that Yoram's reaction is stronger and less acceptable, and I think that he should apologize to Daniel, preferably in public. But I still think that Daniel's reply was wrong for a man and scholar of his calibre. The purpose of correcting Yoram's spelling mistake was obviously not to teach, it was more like a punch below the belt- if teaching was the intention then it would best have been done in private, and not in public- this only creates a resentment and diversion from the really important issues. Again, I have no great sympathy to Yoram after his disregard to Daniel, but I'm just surprised of Daniel's reaction.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.