69 million page views

Third Perspective in Yoram's Case.

Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer
in response to reader comment: Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Aug 15, 2008 at 00:36

You said:

"..The purpose of correcting Yoram's spelling mistake was obviously not to teach, it was more like a punch below the belt- if teaching was the intention then it would best have been done in private, and not in public"...

Can we say that if Dr. Pipes did not intend to exercise his right as a teacher by kindly teaching, but as you said to punch below the belt, perhaps none of us in the third perspective would be right, for example, that Dr. Pipes has the right to be so exhausted sometimes, so, let's say that he outbursted- as a result of a relief, not an attack, for what to this very moment nor I did understand Yoram's aim.

So 1. To teach Yoram (NO).

2. To mock him (No).

3. Outsburts (perhaps).

As I said, it was also such nonsense that Yoram retreated so fast from his initial position upon which he attacked Dr. Pipes, which leads me to think that Yoram used danielpipes.org popularity for self propaganda, and Yoram knew in advance that the motto that states that a Diaspora Jew has no right to put his finger on the Israeli issue (for what he does not "suffer" like Israelis), would be addressed by Dr. Pipes as a way to find a reason for Yoram's attack against him.

No...Yoram knew it would camouflage his real aim....I'm more convinced than ever and Dr. Pipes has the right to counter attack, enough to shut Yoram's mouth, for the sake of not having his time wasted.

To be honest yet, I'm curious to know the end of that, in regards to Yoram's Aim.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Israel downhill slide [100 words]Gregory SmithSep 15, 2008 11:29138623
Who is Schweizer? [77 words]AzrielAug 19, 2008 12:53137015
To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer [122 words]huckAug 6, 2008 07:56136351
Disagree with you Huck [165 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:53136351
Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you [138 words]huckAug 13, 2008 06:02136351
2Thanks Huck- Deeply Appreciated. [29 words]YnnatchkahAug 13, 2008 14:50136351
Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. [274 words]YnnatchkahAug 15, 2008 00:36136351
Interesting thoughts Ynnatchkah [115 words]huckAug 15, 2008 23:14136351
I liked a lot your commentary, especially the following part: [344 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 20:02136351
Sound bite not so bad [56 words]Archimedes2Aug 6, 2008 01:03136335
Yes. The Sound Byte [47 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:43136335
good job Daniel Pipes [104 words]Yuval BrandstetterAug 5, 2008 00:25136289
How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position? [313 words]Ken BesigAug 4, 2008 14:04136258
Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? [298 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 21:07136258
About sound bites and bytes [134 words]G.VishvasAug 4, 2008 09:24136236
Same old mistakes [141 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 4, 2008 09:11136235
Yoram does spell his intentions...In my opinion.... [866 words]YnnatchkahAug 4, 2008 03:41136219

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. by Ynnatchkah

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)