Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Disagree with you Huck
Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer
in response to reader comment: To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Aug 9, 2008 at 14:53

Disagree on several levels, but do not want to write much.

Yoram Schweitzer should be fully acknowledging the right (and the importance) of Daniel Pipes to state his opinions, yet, it does not hold the same standard in terms of intensity, quality and intention that DR. Pipes correcting his English- do not see any equivalency - sorry.

Yet, myself as a foreigner, I would be delighted and honored having a person like Dr. Pipes correcting my (poor) English. To me it is a procedure of care and an opportunity to learn.

In this case, it is NOT a way to denigrate Yoram, b/c public knows that Yoram is a foreigner- so Dr. Pipes did NOT intend to harm him. DR. Pipes is also a teacher so it is within his realm to correct it. Yet, would he be in silence, it would sound as if he passed over this tremenduous mistake (perpetuated by Yoram), comforming as a result with this low level in English expression.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title By Date
Israel downhill slide [100 words]Gregory SmithSep 15, 2008 11:29
Who is Schweizer? [77 words]AzrielAug 19, 2008 12:53
To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer [122 words]huckAug 6, 2008 07:56
⇒ Disagree with you Huck [165 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:53
Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you [138 words]huckAug 13, 2008 06:02
Thanks Huck- Deeply Appreciated. [29 words]YnnatchkahAug 13, 2008 14:50
Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. [274 words]YnnatchkahAug 15, 2008 00:36
Interesting thoughts Ynnatchkah [115 words]huckAug 15, 2008 23:14
I liked a lot your commentary, especially the following part: [344 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 20:02
Sound bite not so bad [56 words]Archimedes2Aug 6, 2008 01:03
Yes. The Sound Byte [47 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:43
good job Daniel Pipes [104 words]Yuval BrandstetterAug 5, 2008 00:25
How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position? [313 words]Ken BesigAug 4, 2008 14:04
Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? [298 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 21:07
About sound bites and bytes [134 words]G.VishvasAug 4, 2008 09:24
Same old mistakes [141 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 4, 2008 09:11
Yoram does spell his intentions...In my opinion.... [866 words]YnnatchkahAug 4, 2008 03:41

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page