69 million page views

To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer

Reader comment on item: A Final Reply to Yoram Schweitzer

Submitted by huck (United Kingdom), Aug 6, 2008 at 07:56

The two of you are obviously on the same boat, sharing goals and views that are not very different.
This whole matter seems to me as two adults that need shake hands, put this behind and move on together.
Yoram Schweitzer should fully acknowledge the right (and the importance) of Daniel Pipes to state his opinions, and Daniel Pipes shouldn't pick on Yoram Schweitzer's typos as a part of an article/blog- a non-native English speaker might do mistakes in English in the same way that a non-Israeli citizen might sometimes be wrong in analyzing Israeli politics.

It's a pity to waste energies among friends when literally being surrounded with so many enemies and urgent matters than need to be dealt with together.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (17) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Israel downhill slide [100 words]Gregory SmithSep 15, 2008 11:29138623
Who is Schweizer? [77 words]AzrielAug 19, 2008 12:53137015
To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer [122 words]huckAug 6, 2008 07:56136351
Disagree with you Huck [165 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:53136351
Ynnatchkah, agree and disagree with you [138 words]huckAug 13, 2008 06:02136351
2Thanks Huck- Deeply Appreciated. [29 words]YnnatchkahAug 13, 2008 14:50136351
Third Perspective in Yoram's Case. [274 words]YnnatchkahAug 15, 2008 00:36136351
Interesting thoughts Ynnatchkah [115 words]huckAug 15, 2008 23:14136351
I liked a lot your commentary, especially the following part: [344 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 20:02136351
Sound bite not so bad [56 words]Archimedes2Aug 6, 2008 01:03136335
Yes. The Sound Byte [47 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 14:43136335
good job Daniel Pipes [104 words]Yuval BrandstetterAug 5, 2008 00:25136289
How can Yoram Schweitzer, someone so shallow, hold such an important position? [313 words]Ken BesigAug 4, 2008 14:04136258
Ken, are you sure about Yoram Schweitzer? [298 words]YnnatchkahAug 9, 2008 21:07136258
About sound bites and bytes [134 words]G.VishvasAug 4, 2008 09:24136236
Same old mistakes [141 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 4, 2008 09:11136235
Yoram does spell his intentions...In my opinion.... [866 words]YnnatchkahAug 4, 2008 03:41136219

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to To Daniel Pipes and Yoram Schweitzer by huck

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)