69 million page views

To: Fred Schlomka: on "armchairs and nonsense."

Reader comment on item: My Testimony before the House Subcommittee on Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations
in response to reader comment: To Mariana from an israeli

Submitted by mariana (United States), Apr 1, 2007 at 12:50

posted by an American: mariana 4/1/07
To: Fred Schlomka: on "armchairs and nonsense."

Sorry about the armchair, but a bug has had me in bed past few days, so forgive me if my energy level is down a bit. Firstly, I'd like to refer you to two of my posted responses [above] :

↔ To: Kenneth Besig re Ross v Indyk [597 words] March 19, 2007,
↔ To Daniel and Gabriel: on "Winning" [522 words] Mar 20, 2007 00:49

They are as good a place to begin as any, and energy level being what it is, and with them in mind:

Cross cultural relationships are wonderful, healthy, and definitely contribute positively to any Utopian future we would want to live in; however, it would be good to look at them for exactly what they are: Interpersonal relationships between individuals, which do not represent [even] their own world at large, and, while one might argue that if EVERYONE participated, it would be a beautiful world, everyone does not, will not and in fact, will never participate. Ask them.

I'm delighted to hear that you like "being Middle Eastern." There are over 220 million Muslim Arabs "being Middle Eastern" in your neighborhood. In most cases, their treatment of women is not only disgraceful, but quite disgusting. These "honour killings" would be hilarious if they weren't so tragic. Imagine, the "honour" of all of the men of a given family being controlled by the "perceived" behaviour of one female, and this "perception" justifying murder or blackmailing the female into becoming a murder/suicide bomber. What power!

What does it mean to you "being Middle Eastern?" Does that mean: as opposed to being part of Western Civilization and the Enlightenment? Scientific method [or "religious concensus?]? Freedom to worship your G*d in your way? Freedom of speech, and to read or study whatever you will? To pursue a life according to your "own drummer?" Are you talking about foods? climate? clothing? Or the tradition- bound, Muslim Umma, where you're just one speck of sand in a great desert, "destined" to follow Imams and Mullahs? Are you prepared to follow the Rabbis in your community down to the nnth degree? Or Mullahs or Ayatollahs, for that matter? Or does "being Middle Eastern" mean something else to you?

You may feel that I've exaggerated: that "being Middle Eastern" doesn't "necessarily" mean the few things I've mentioned, but out of 220+ million Arab Muslims, polls say more than 80% [along with a "majority" of M.E. Persian Muslims], want to hold onto that crap.... I mean, after all, maybe if I was a man, I'd want to treat my mother, wife, and girl children worse than I treated my cattle [if the society permitted me to be sufficiently prosperous to own any]. It would certainly enhance my self esteem - if for no other reason than by comparison. After all, if one side gets to 'fix the game' so they've got 90% of all the goodies and perquisites, and the 10% crumbs allowed to fall off the table are under their control [to allow to drop or not], and if that was all I knew and my Mullahs were saying it was the "natural order of things," I, too, might want to lie, cheat and kill to preserve it.

In Iran in 1979, ignorant, filthy bumpkins and street animals given guns could prove they were superior to a cultured and educated woman with a PhD. They could force women to throw a black sack over themselves with only eyes showing, rape them, stone them; they could force women to stay home unless accompanied by A MAN, any man, ignorant, filthy, retarded.... didn't matter: Just had to have a male organ.

Khomeini and his animals gleefully sacrificed FEMALE doctors, lawyers, professors, architects, etc., sent them home or killed them on "morals" charges, leaving their "society" exposed to the expected diseases, backwardness and predations. They had this clever thing: rape a woman or girl who didn't tow the line, call her a slut then stone her in the "arena." Even better sport than lions and Christians.

Just whose LAW do you prefer to live and raise your family under? And under whose law do you believe your son's Arab friends will better prosper? You mention a 16 year old son; well, I had a daughter. Perhaps that makes a difference. My daughter was born in the early 60's and was part of "integration" in urban America, in a W. Coast city which fast became "majority minority." There were difficulties interfacing cultures in the generic [our family never had racial problems specifically or individually]. There was a great deal of crime, violence, burning and riots [certainly nothing to compare with bombs and 'suiciders']. During her entire childhood, we drove her and picked her up; she NEVER played outside in a park, on the sidewalk or in the front yard unattended, and around the tiny back yard, there was an 8' wooden locked fence one could not see through, protecting her and the neighbor kids.

I'm sure your son's Arab friend is a lot safer living under Israeli law than he [or certainly you] would be living under Palestinian Law [if "P.Law" is not an oxymoron, as I've seen no sort of law at all besides the law of a very, very sick jungle].

I found your colloquy with Linda Moore quite interesting. In your response to her "Rot or prosper" piece, you say:

"The elimination of the hope for peace has come from Israel's refusal to seriously negotiate for years before Hamas was elected."

I thought it was Arafat who said NO to Ross & Indyk and Clinton. Now WHAT, will you NEGOTIATE with Hamas? Their absolute, explicitly unalterable [and apparently now acceptable] position is that they WILL NOT RECOGNIZE "the Zionist entity," will not recognize any previous agreements with "the Zionist entity," and they WILL push "the Zionist entity" and all Jews into the sea. I'm sure this is a serious weakness on my part, but I don't see a "negotiating" position here; and Rice and Peres & Olmert's fantasy that they can have these "final settlement" negotiations without the 3 bases US & Israel [here-to-fore] always insisted upon as a starting point, I see as dangerous in the extreme, bordering upon catastrophic.

I'm not smart enough to see any distinction between Saudi Arabia's great NEW plan and exactly what they and the rest of the Muslim Arabs have been demanding FOREVER!! They have never kept their word in any negotiation; never fulfilled their side of any "bargain," and the best you can come up with is that: "It was Israel's fault..no matter whatever, It's Israel's fault." The trick of it is that you have to HEAR the WORDS, and understand that they mean what they say, and not substitute your Utopian dreams into their meanings.

Do you believe that you "will be considered one of the 'good Israelis' who will be permitted to live in peace with Hamas and the rest of the Umma as a Jew when they win?" This has an awful familiar ring to it, as, at least twice in my lifetime, Europe and USSR had their "good Jews," and my recollection of the results for even the "good Jews" is not as hopeful or sunny as yours appears to be. But then, I'm here in my "armchair," and maybe sitting in an armchair facilitates thinking, remembering, and being able to project the probable effects certain actions might cause [particularly when one bothers to compare them with what has happened in the past under similar circumstances]. "Learning" is an interesting process.

No one has suggested that there aren't "good Palestinians;" the salient point is simply that over 85% of those polled want the status quo of Jihad and Intifadah; and even MORE of them would vote for Hamas today than actually voted them into office.

I do not need to tell you what's going on in the madrassah schools and summer camps throughout the Umma; I'm sure you've seen the "proud daddys" in Gaza and W. Bank, holding up their babies with green shahid rags on their heads and dynamite belts on their waists; and I know you've heard about those 2 sterling muslim gentlemen who got past security in Iraq last week with 2 young children in the back seat, only to park the auto-bomb, leaving the kids in the car to be blown up. This is Sharia in action, sort of.

I'm sure a treatise can be written on the glorious sacrifice these young "shahids" have made, but as a mother and grandmother, there's only a nausea so deep that it rocks me. But, even though you see these generations of mentally mutilated and indoctrinated young people [did someone say 75% of the pop?] ahead of you, you have high hopes.

I wish you Joy Fred Schlomka, and Luck also. Meanwhile, I can not help it that all the things in my mind and memory are waving red flags and blinking bright red lights, saying: "Been there, done that!" and wondering why Rice, Peres, Livni, Olmert and you, think it will be "different" or "better" this time.

Since the stakes are so high and Israel is so small - and since 220 million Muslims can now believe that they are "almost there," just what will we do if you're wrong? Who will do it? And at what cost? mariana

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (79) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Former 'unreliable B'tselem propagandist' steps down from ratings giant Sustainalytics [569 words]Rita VAug 10, 2022 17:18284999
Another Pallywood fake B'tselem Basel Adra: Ma'on Farm [268 words]Diana from CaliforniaApr 15, 2022 12:02279811
Inviting people to use symmetry in reasoning [361 words]PrashantApr 16, 2022 16:39279811
Pallywood: more "Palestinian" cry for cameras only [Dec 2021] [187 words]Diana from CaliforniaApr 18, 2022 03:49279811
Assymetrical Posturing in Irrational Diatribes Rather Than Common Ground of Understanding Do Not Reconcile [76 words]M ToveyApr 18, 2022 18:55279811
"sustained and systematic effort to alter a bellicose mentality" [111 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David BakinJun 5, 2007 15:0596116
Dr Pipes changing tone.. [112 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
HarrakApr 16, 2007 21:0189431
Thanks Dr Pipes [10 words]HarrakApr 17, 2007 21:2589431
Jaw-dropper [86 words]Mark RothApr 13, 2007 07:5489130
Martin Indyk and Dennis Ross are badly misinformed and a real danger to Israeli Jews [152 words]Kenneth BesigMar 18, 2007 02:4886685
Agree with Kenneth Besig's calibration re: Ross v Indyk; however... [597 words]marianaMar 19, 2007 22:2886685
Is It Time Yet? [367 words]Ron ThompsonMar 17, 2007 19:3986662
Hearings on Israeli-Palestinian "Progress" [23 words]Herb JuristMar 16, 2007 23:1086586
Pipes subcommittee comments [141 words]DeanMar 16, 2007 22:5286583
House subcommittee hearing [45 words]Steven LMar 16, 2007 17:2386543
Will this fairy tale never end? [187 words]DrRJPMar 5, 2007 18:0280412
Middle East Experts [152 words]DavodMar 12, 2007 05:0680412
Mysterious and Unique Logic? [184 words]Dean KitnickFeb 26, 2007 19:5479152
Re your position toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict [68 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gabriel RinzlerFeb 25, 2007 21:0278889
Let the Arabs rot... [304 words]Linda MooreFeb 26, 2007 12:1778889
"Let the Arabs Rot" by Linda [245 words]Fred SchlomkaFeb 28, 2007 11:1878889
OK, rot or prosper, I don't care which [194 words]Linda MooreFeb 28, 2007 17:4778889
Rot or Prosper continued [172 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 1, 2007 00:0878889
I find it hard to believe you are Israeli - all of your hostility is directed at Israel [310 words]Linda MooreMar 1, 2007 17:4478889
1There are many types of Israelis. We are no more homogenious than people in the USA [283 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 2, 2007 09:3578889
Litmus test is dangerous to Antisemites [66 words]DeMar 2, 2007 17:3378889
Visit this site... [143 words]Linda MooreMar 2, 2007 19:0578889
Of Maps and fatalities [454 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 4, 2007 05:1478889
To: Fred Schlomka, Incredible. "You just can't make it up!" [454 words]marianaMar 19, 2007 20:4178889
To Daniel and Gabriel: on "Winning" [522 words]marianaMar 20, 2007 00:4978889
to Mariana [100 words]ASMar 22, 2007 00:3878889
Fred Schlomka: -Israeli leftist- Is there a difference? [87 words]Mr. ShawarmaMar 27, 2007 23:4678889
Boorish title from Mr. Shawamra [192 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 29, 2007 04:1178889
To Mariana from an israeli [461 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 29, 2007 16:2678889
I applaud those whom you and Jonathan Cook refer to as "thugs" and yes, Jew hater = Ashkenazi Leftist [402 words]Mr.ShawarmaMar 29, 2007 17:0578889
attack by Shawamra [197 words]Fred SchlomkaMar 31, 2007 02:3078889
Fred Schlomka's comments [319 words]Mr. ShawarmaMar 31, 2007 17:3078889
To: Fred Schlomka: on "armchairs and nonsense." [1572 words]marianaApr 1, 2007 12:5078889
some comments for Mariana [878 words]Fred SchlomkaApr 2, 2007 04:3278889
To: AS: This is an ISLAM vs EVERYONE ELSE issue [943 words]marianaApr 2, 2007 11:3878889
To Fred Schlomka: Your "Middle Eastern" Construct is clear. Forgive me if "I pass." [776 words]marianaApr 4, 2007 17:0378889
Fred Schlomka - Hill Top Youth comments verified [40 words]Fred SchlomkaDec 3, 2008 03:4178889
B'TSELEM: Anti Israel liars, unreliable source, propagandists , posing as "human rights activists" [2927 words]FilipSep 1, 2020 11:5778889
Btselem: fake & hypocritical In face of publicized racist Arab attacks inside Israel [77 words]NazariasApr 19, 2021 06:5578889
Fake lying B'Tselem' / Haaretz Basel al-Adara reminds Jussie Smollet [712 words]BassemDec 3, 2021 16:4078889
Exposure of B'tselem's criminal Ezra Bawi and unreliable Haaretz's war on program that exposed him [2865 words]FilipDec 5, 2021 09:1978889
Radical bigot Zehava Galon lack of basic English exposed too [1877 words]FilipOct 18, 2022 19:2378889
WHICH PUBLICATIONS? [21 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mike DavisFeb 25, 2007 20:2878883
War of Wills [455 words]OliverFeb 25, 2007 17:4778869
Negotiation is valuable, even if you believe it won't bring peace [277 words]Erik NelsonFeb 25, 2007 17:2378866
Illumination [297 words]Felipe OrnelasMar 1, 2007 18:4778866
Chamberlain negotiated at Munich... [149 words]DeanMar 16, 2007 23:2478866
Biological [126 words]Don HedemanFeb 25, 2007 17:0978865
ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.. [186 words]DONVANMar 20, 2007 16:0178865
To Donvan: Interesting; would you expand. [152 words]marianaApr 2, 2007 11:5578865
It is not academic.. [174 words]DONVANApr 3, 2007 10:3278865
An unlikely negotiation [289 words]Melvyn RosensteinFeb 25, 2007 15:2978850
re "Arab & Muslim World." [160 words]Jascha KesslerFeb 25, 2007 15:2778849
history and the arab and islamic world [87 words]rodney allsworthFeb 25, 2007 22:3678849
Reaction to Pipes, Indyk, Makovsky Congressional Testimony [187 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Martin KaufmanFeb 25, 2007 10:0878790
The Good Old Gulag Days. [42 words]LeeFeb 25, 2007 09:3578788
Apology for not making it with my big Speed Graphic camera [233 words]Dan SchwartzFeb 25, 2007 08:4378780
Re House Subcommittee on Israeli -Palestinian Nego... [26 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
david levyFeb 25, 2007 06:2078766
consider this... [140 words]JoshuaFeb 22, 2007 00:0578292
RE: Great debate [279 words]Donald Grant CheesmanFeb 25, 2007 18:5778292
"OH NO!" "DON'T SAY IT!" But ... "BRAVO!" [1378 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sofa SogoodFeb 21, 2007 16:5378222
Peace or Genocide [184 words]Felipe OrnelasFeb 20, 2007 12:1878061
Hate to disagree with you but I do. [105 words]PeterFeb 20, 2007 11:1278054
Hate to disagree with your disagreement, but I do [106 words]Dean KitnickFeb 20, 2007 18:2878054
No dean, you have misunderstood ... [128 words]PeterFeb 21, 2007 23:1178054
No misunderstanding, I just think you're wrong. [86 words]Dean KitnickFeb 22, 2007 20:0878054
I agree with Peter [51 words]Irish SavantFeb 25, 2007 07:1078054
Reality Check [219 words]LarryFeb 25, 2007 09:3878054
Some things are non-negotiable [106 words]ZerubbabelFeb 25, 2007 10:1778054
Actually you needn't wonder. My comments stand on their face. [166 words]PeterFeb 25, 2007 15:3078054
Furthermore [69 words]PeterFeb 25, 2007 15:3678054
The genocide gene evolves [258 words]AronFeb 25, 2007 19:0078054
Why elevate Israel legitimacy to a debate? [59 words]JakeFeb 26, 2007 11:4278054
Subcommittee Investigations [435 words]MichaelMar 3, 2007 12:5578054

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to To: Fred Schlomka: on "armchairs and nonsense." by mariana

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)