69 million page views

back at you Octavio

Reader comment on item: "Pasha Bordello" Accepts Islamist Demands
in response to reader comment: Re: Muslims vs Hispanics

Submitted by Sidda (United States), May 30, 2006 at 10:57

Octavio, I do think we are on the same page on this issue. I have myself compared the immigration issue in Europe with that of the US. Yes, there are different aspects to both of those situations, but they are the same in the aspects that you mentioned; namely, the support for unfettered immigration in the media and amongst the elites, and in the way the governments seem to ignore the will of the people. Add to that the fact that the Mexican government WANTS their people to come here and encourages it. Mexicans working in the US send back $20 billion to the Mexican economy each year. So, the failure of the Mexican government to implement reforms to their system, and the desire by American business for cheap labor are the root causes of the problem we are having. We are trying to deal with the symptoms, but not the root cause. Realistically, I don't know what we can do to force Mexico to get their act together. But, maybe if they did not have the US as their "safety valve" the people would demand reforms. I just don't know.

It is so frustrating when all we want is an orderly immigration system whereby we can determine who comes into the US and what they are doing (and where they are) when they are here. If we cannot control who comes here, there are many negative consequences. In the US, there is the possibility of terrorists coming across the border (although this applies not only to the Southern border, but also to the Northern border with Canada), all the drug trafficking, criminal gangs, etc. Yes, most illegals only want to come to work, but a certain percentage have less than noble intentions.

It is also frustrating to be called all kinds of names because you believe that your country, as a sovereign nation, has the right to insist on legal, orderly immigration policies and that people who wish to immigrate to your country follow these policies. I will admit that in the case of the US, our immigration system is very cumbersome. Now, I don't think it should be a cake walk to come to the US, but I don't think having a system where it is virtually impossible to come (having to wait YEARS AND YEARS), exactly encourages people to take the legal route. But now the average American who just wants their country's laws and sovereignty respected (and language and culture) are called "nativists, bigots, racists, xenophobes, right wing extremists. Right wing extremist!! That is so far off the mark in my case, and in most peoples'. Well, we know by now that those charges are meant to intimidate us and any politician who speaks out against open borders.

I will say that at least in the US now we are having an open debate about this issue. I watch C-Span when these debates are taking place, and the frankness with which it is being discussed is impressive. Even though the media is overwhelmingly in support of open borders, and often misrepresents the issue in their reporting by referring to the issue as "immigrant rights"--not calling them what they are which are ILLEGAL immigrants who broke the law to come here--we still forge ahead. I would say that is at least one difference between Europe and the US; Europeans, as I understand it, are reluctant to even speak about the issue. Here we are screaming it from the rooftops and nobody can shut us up! The Minutemen are down on the border right now building their own fence on private property where illegals come through using privately donated funds. Would Europeans be inclined to have such a group? I don't know.

The Senate passed a bill last week which was not at all impressive--not much in the way of border security. It is imperative that we stop the hordes from coming before we grant any pathway to legalization for those who are already here or we will just end up in the same situation we found ourselves in after the last amnesty was granted 20 years ago. The Senate bill will go to conference with the House in June. The House is very opposed to anything which does not include strict border control; a lot of the House representatives are up for reelection and so they are more inclined to follow the will of their constituents. So, we will see if a compromise can be reached. I hope that whatever they come up with will contain strict border control, making it clear to the immigrants that they must speak English and assimilate into our culture. If this doesn't happen, we might all be dancing around hats before too long! (I guess I am being xenophobic now)

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (57) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
A visit to Pasha's [74 words]SirMarjalotApr 26, 2009 11:17154489
fabulously hypocritical [71 words]SHANEYJan 2, 2008 18:15117374
Jihad is it over or is it real [168 words]Thomas Earl CannadyJun 30, 2006 07:4248523
Getting ready for Eurabia [186 words]Octavio JohansonMay 24, 2006 11:2646291
coalition between leftists and radical moslems [44 words]mehranMay 14, 2006 05:5045556
1dubai [94 words]mehranMay 13, 2006 06:1745497
londonistan or london? [89 words]mehranMay 13, 2006 16:5145497
Of course it is Londonistan [106 words]Octavio JohansonMay 22, 2006 02:4745497
islam and west [114 words]mehranMay 13, 2006 06:0245496
2More sex for Saudi men = less terrorism and happy men [187 words]allyson rowen taylorMay 11, 2006 01:0945326
Pascha [13 words]Donald W. BalesMay 8, 2006 19:3645053
The Saudi flag [50 words]rickMay 8, 2006 18:3045049
Blatant hypocrisy [295 words]yzoleowlMay 8, 2006 17:5545042
Where do I start? [491 words]FrenchKissMay 6, 2006 02:1044934
2Sex worker ' French Kiss' speaks with forked tongue: Praise of Muslim clients belies Islamist misogyny and hypocrisy [1130 words]Ben van de PolderMay 7, 2006 10:1844934
You're a funny guy, Ben [982 words]FrenchKissMay 9, 2006 23:3944934
Why Islamic People Don't Integrate [67 words]SaraMay 29, 2006 12:4644934
Human Trafficing is wrong anywhere [47 words]ShiaOct 17, 2009 14:0844934
HUMAN EVENTS: "Germany's Sex Shacks Tarnish World Cup" [325 words]Dan Schwartz (Cherry Hill, NJ)May 5, 2006 12:2644907
but in holland... [33 words]danielMay 3, 2006 10:4144794
It does not surprise me! [133 words]Octavio JohansonMay 3, 2006 14:5444794
thank you octavio [43 words]cyrusMay 22, 2006 16:0244794
Islamic hypocrisy as usual [64 words]RastamanMay 1, 2006 14:4244684
Difference between Tunisia and Saudi flags [124 words]Mard e MominMay 1, 2006 07:5244666
Pascha Owner Didn't Want To 0ffend His Customers [34 words]Mike's AmericaApr 30, 2006 12:4544615
Women on both sides want modesty [32 words]Genevieve KinekeApr 28, 2006 12:1644427
A missed opportunity but it can be corrected [74 words]rickApr 27, 2006 16:0644345
Clash of the Civilisations [139 words]Georges FernandezApr 27, 2006 11:3844327
Muslim culture is different [293 words]Octavio JohansonApr 27, 2006 17:1144327
We have a 700 year head start [410 words]FrenchKissMay 8, 2006 07:3644327
700 years? [385 words]JohnMay 9, 2006 10:3844327
I wasn't justifying their behavior [148 words]FrenchKissMay 11, 2006 18:2544327
Subjugate (Surrender) or decapitate? [285 words]Vishnu GuptaMay 16, 2006 11:1444327
Then, Europe will go back to the Middle Ages [215 words]Octavio JohansonMay 21, 2006 14:3844327
to Octavio [116 words]SiddaMay 21, 2006 21:0544327
agreed! [67 words]concernedMay 22, 2006 15:3944327
to concerned [34 words]SiddaMay 22, 2006 16:2644327
Oil [167 words]Octavio JohansonMay 22, 2006 17:3544327
Eurabia [145 words]Octavio JohansonMay 22, 2006 17:4344327
Muslim vs. Hispanic [56 words]SiddaMay 23, 2006 17:5644327
Re: Muslims vs Hispanics [292 words]Octavio JohansonMay 27, 2006 14:3144327
back at you Octavio [799 words]SiddaMay 30, 2006 10:5744327
You are NOT xenophobic, Sidda [278 words]Octavio JohansonMay 30, 2006 15:1644327
We must be realistic, Sidda [108 words]Octavio JohansonMay 30, 2006 17:5644327
re: sidda [364 words]concernedJun 3, 2006 17:1044327
I'd be angry, too [57 words]RobinApr 27, 2006 09:3544319
Robin, you're missing the point [167 words]SiddaMay 2, 2006 11:0444319
I agree [298 words]AnneMay 4, 2006 20:3144319
Pascha and the Swedes [120 words]Herbert EiteneierApr 26, 2006 01:5344196
No sex before martyrdom: Taliban try to enforce shar'ia in Cologne [120 words]Ben van de PolderApr 25, 2006 20:3944176
The Germans are naive enough to give in [92 words]Octavio JohansonApr 28, 2006 12:2744176
1Muslim hypocrisy:polygamy-harems- sex tourism and slavery in Denver [127 words]Ben van de PolderApr 25, 2006 16:3044141
Keep this in perspective [187 words]BilalApr 26, 2006 13:2944141
Western surrender monkeys [98 words]Octavio JohansonApr 28, 2006 04:1544141
Hypocrisy [45 words]VijayMay 5, 2006 08:1344141
Central London [53 words]Octavio JohansonMay 10, 2006 06:3544141
what Muslims need for revolution in world [57 words]Mian Luqman HussainFeb 6, 2007 23:5744141

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to back at you Octavio by Sidda

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)