18 readers online now

98,559 comments by 26,197 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Incredibly good
Reader comment on item: Arabia's Civil War

Submitted by Ilona Melstrads (United States), May 14, 2003 at 15:11

The article reflects the author's outstanding mastery of history; otherwise he could not have provided such an illuminating summary in so few paragraphs. The summary places the main events in a perspective I have not encountered before: the religous + military on the one hand and the political on the other.

When one looks at economics and the British, Russian and American victory in WW II, in which Saudi oil and its development by the West was so important, one is almost made a believer in some kind of special Providence! What made it so relatively easy for Roosevelt and others to persuade the Saudi government to help? If the Saudi Royal family had resisted, could the US have actually taken over the country? One doubts it, but maybe yes, as with the Philipppines. And then what? The US was clearly ideologically unprepared.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (32) on this item

Title By Date
Response to comments [180 words]Faisal AlotaibiDec 26, 2005 19:55
There is a great need for this kind of information (education)
[w/response] [115 words]
Attilio Capponi, Ph.D.Aug 29, 2004 20:21
Islamic Emirate of Arabia? [507 words]John PowerAug 5, 2004 19:47
Let them be what they are! [98 words]Glenn KlotzMay 28, 2003 15:33
"Cosmopolitan" [61 words]S.C.PandaMay 26, 2003 07:01
Origin of Violence [106 words]A.A.May 22, 2003 11:17
How the US is supporting dictatorship and terrorism [277 words]Alain Jean-MairetMay 20, 2003 06:01
Make a deal with the devil? [25 words]AviMay 19, 2003 18:47
Bad News? [122 words]Alain Jean-MairetMay 16, 2003 09:43
The complexity of Saudi Arabia's internal situation
[w/response] [425 words]
Carool KerstenMay 15, 2003 22:49
Long Over-Due Explanation [76 words]Jacob BurkeyMay 15, 2003 17:58
Saudi Dilemma [92 words]Irma RochlinMay 15, 2003 15:11
Women in Islamism
[w/response] [126 words]
Johanna MarkindMay 15, 2003 13:10
Saudi Arabia [18 words]Joah MarderMay 15, 2003 10:49
A better choice [135 words]Tom PensylMay 15, 2003 09:01
On what basis? [41 words]John GridleyMay 15, 2003 07:30
The U.S. should stay out of it [197 words]DiannaMay 15, 2003 07:15
Another Alternative [11 words]Paul M. NevilleMay 15, 2003 06:01
Oh man oh man................. [78 words]Devon HillMay 15, 2003 01:55
Sponsorship of Wahhabi organizations abroad [54 words]William KinneyMay 14, 2003 22:21
USA and the west should stop the war in Arab land. [98 words]Humphrey W.WalelaNov 19, 2008 03:24
From al Sa'ud to al Thani [286 words]AvrahamMay 14, 2003 20:43
Confrontation [55 words]Gene BehlMay 14, 2003 20:08
Thanks [156 words]Annabel FrostMay 14, 2003 18:30
The end game [373 words]jmsMay 14, 2003 16:59
Support the royal family again? [54 words]Edmund JamesMay 14, 2003 16:51
Your article "Arabia's Civil War" [105 words]M.DunskyMay 14, 2003 16:27
⇒ Incredibly good [143 words]Ilona MelstradsMay 14, 2003 15:11
Hydrogen is the answer [64 words]Lucas J. MeyerMay 14, 2003 15:07
Neither good [83 words]George El MasriMay 14, 2003 14:43
The Ikhwan-inspired enemy [38 words]Hank ArtzeMay 14, 2003 13:51
By What Saudi Acts is the Regime Distinguished from Al Qaeda? [98 words]Brad ClovenMay 14, 2003 12:38

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com