Still we need to worry
Reader comment on item: Is Omar Alghabra of Canada's Liberal Party an Islamist?
in response to reader comment: No Need to Worry Part 2

Submitted by hr (Egypt), Feb 1, 2006 at 16:55

What I am trying to say is; The Media is corrupted.

A Coward Corrupt Media, this is the last thing we need, I really don't care about Martin or Alghabra or who ever, as long as the Media are doing their job.

When people get the correct news, they make the best call.

Concerning faith, Islam is a different story; it's not a faith at all. If I stand up and say Nazism is my faith and everybody has to respect it, does that work?

You said "a government cannot reject a candidate merely because he/she is of a certain faith and/or if his/her supporters or whatever say stupid things."
Does that apply to Nazism?

The Koran asks clearly the Muslim, if he can; "kill all non-Muslims where ever you find them". Please read the Koran (in Arabic please) especially "Suret Al-Tuba" (the last chapter), also read the "Nasekh and Mansoukh" to know which verses in the Koran are cancelled and which remain.

If Muslims say Islam is a religion and a faith should we merely believes them?

Making it clear, Islam is NOT a faith, it's a virtual empire, and the Muslims are the warriors, and they have to please Alaty Akbar. We are all infidels and we must be killed, we are under a constant threat, not because the Muslims are weak today does that mean we are safe.

Also read about the "Taqia", the most dangerous of them all, it teaches the Muslims the arts of lying and faking as long as they're weak, and how to creep slowly to reach power.

The west will truly understand Islam only and again only if they wake up one day and find Islam in control.

If you see a patient screaming from cancer you will surely shiver, but never will you get the real pain, never will you get it, until you get it.

There is nothing called Radical Islam, there is one Islam, and of you want to see the real 100% pure Islam, look at Taliban.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.