69 million page views

AlGhabra is WEASLE

Reader comment on item: Is Omar Alghabra of Canada's Liberal Party an Islamist?

Submitted by HR (Egypt), Dec 23, 2005 at 05:51

Alghabra is not only an "Radical Islamist" but also a true "Weasel".

People are loosing even the standards of "Logic Thinking"

Lets go through the whole issue together:
1- Accusations were made against Alghabra and his supporters, and all the Islamic Statements and Radical Fanatical heat that rose in space that night. It could be true, it could be false, or somewhere in between. OK?
Also, accusations were made against Rogers, as they were there shooting the whole thing. Rogers ignored the phone calls to release tape, in reponse to the elections day.

2- Alghabra, came out saying "its all false".

3- Rogers, after ignoring all the requests from day one, came out saying they edited the tape, and they didn't keep the Raw Tape.

4- Everybody, started defending Alghabra, saying the accusations are not true.

5- All sorts of Forums spoke about this, including the CBC forum.


1- Where is Alghabra?, why didn't any one ask him, where were you from all these Radical Statements, even if we believe "you said nothing", it was your night. Why did you not show your regret?

2- Why did Alghabra not make it clear?, and say the whole truth (from his view at least). Why did he stand up in the press and said "I said nothing in my acceptance speech" and left it like that. Why did come out and say "on the other hand, I regret the statements made, by so and so".

3- I didn't see Alghabra apologizing for what was said by his supporter/s. Not apologizing clearly shows his agreement.

4- Rogers had a proof and erased it.

5- What if nothing came out in the Mississauga news?. And why do we believe that the Liberals are saying the full truth? It was their Riding, wasn't it. Common sense, they will try to cool things down.

6- What happened, all of a sudden to the CBC-Erindale Forum? They removed many posts.

7- WHY WE NOW, TAKE THE ACCUSATIONS A BIT MORE SERIOUS. WHY DO WE BELEIVE JUST THE WORDS OF PARISH AND ELIAS. AGAIN IF YOU HAVE REMEBER ITS THEIR RIDING, AND THEY CARE THAT OMAR KEEPS GOING FOR THE ELECTIONS. Why do NOT start believing that YES, Omar had his statements too ? Why do just believe what comes out of them?. If Omar says "NO" then its no!!, if Parish says its only the Markham Councilor, then its so. And any one else saying anything different is falsely accusing.

8- After 22 days of the elections day, and after a lot of pressure. Why not did the Liberals start speaking out and admitting ?

9- Now, the Markham Councilor is defending himself. Why don't we beleive him now !!!!??? Just because Parish and Elias said so it doesn't mean they are saying the truth.


SO, one critical question would come out, why now??, why did Parish and Elias speak out now?, they could have easily stayed silent.
Its simple, cause the word was spreading, many saw the incident, not only the names we know from the internet. The word was spreading, and that would affect the elections, and would help the conservatives to take the seat.

SO!!, they sat down and thought about it, and they made this very clever move. By going out and confessing, they would keep some confidence from the people. They made it look as if the whole thing was from a different guy, so keeping their Nominee clean. They also made it seem as if its the conservatives were heating up the whole thing.

So, now, all this anti-Omar Liberal move rising in Erindale, will start cooling down. All the Liberals who don't the truth and never even went to the elections (only 20% went and some only stayed till the very end, when all this happened) would come out a elect Omar, to keep the Erindale seat for the Liberals.

Tricky move, but clever. Its politics and you have to be that tricky to move the public as you wish.

Note: Again and Again, it has been confirmed from many, that Omar did say Radical Statements.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (77) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
The Quebec election and the CAQ wins by a large majority! [36 words]dhimmi no moreOct 2, 2018 09:27245161
2Litmus test for identifying Islamists (Hint: It is very very simple and 100% accurate) [63 words]PrashantAug 12, 2018 15:56244199
Your blog led the husband of PM Trudeau's chief of staff to slander you on Canadian TV [491 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Andrew BaldwinAug 11, 2018 15:11244187
6The Islamic Political movement will not stop! [122 words]Mike YoungDec 10, 2015 13:50226905
10Alghabra - my response to Trudeau's decision [460 words]louise carbonneau vermeirenDec 12, 2015 11:12226905
3Oh Canada.....The New Caliphate [115 words]FroikeDec 18, 2015 10:07226905
6Trudeau appointed Omar Alghabra, as his "Parliamentary secretary of foreign affairs" [110 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ShabnamDec 4, 2015 21:34226801
2It's sad because... [23 words]There is NO Santa ClausDec 11, 2015 09:01226801
It gets worse [16 words]Jay NicollDec 4, 2015 00:39226789
What can we do? [41 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Lois HooksOct 27, 2015 00:48226079
4There are others also [90 words]SunshineOct 25, 2015 23:31226061
1Time To Smarten Up [57 words]FrankSep 27, 2015 23:14225381
1Yawn... [26 words]TajOct 30, 2008 20:29141576
1Concerned Canadian Citizen [236 words]AngOct 27, 2008 14:21141151
An interesting news item about Alghabra [534 words]Elliot RosenbergOct 23, 2008 12:24140771
The Canadian Conservative Party is now "Islamist Free" ... Wooot! [63 words]KristaOct 16, 2008 10:30140282
Don't Give up Canada ! [80 words]DavyOct 28, 2008 16:22140282
We Stand on Guard for Thee [158 words]KristaOct 28, 2008 18:44140282
No Need to Worry Part 2 [117 words]Daniel SklarJan 30, 2006 14:0633122
1To Daniel Sklar - There is NEED to worry [850 words]hrJan 31, 2006 16:5233122
I agree, but.... [327 words]Daniel SklarFeb 1, 2006 13:2833122
Still we need to worry [333 words]hrFeb 1, 2006 16:5533122
With all due respect.... [164 words]Daniel SklarFeb 1, 2006 22:4233122
1May be we should demand that Muslims pay Jizya and be delared as Dhimmis! [20 words]dhimmi no moreFeb 2, 2006 07:1633122
Yes it's true [123 words]hrFeb 3, 2006 16:3733122
1Omar's H oF C debut a flop [470 words]JimApr 14, 2006 22:0733122
1Alghabra is irrelevant [141 words]Daniel SklarApr 19, 2006 12:1433122
Dhimmi tax [53 words]namousAug 29, 2006 11:1033122
Nothing happened [28 words]SalehSep 14, 2006 14:2533122
1He is a lier [15 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
almughtarib Arabic NewspaperDec 6, 2006 05:1833122
No more slavery left in the brave new world. [39 words]BrunoApr 26, 2007 15:1333122
Wrong on this point! [31 words]Mike YoungDec 10, 2015 13:5733122
I guess we can worry now [20 words]Mark WalkerJan 29, 2016 14:4833122
Who is father Zakaria [300 words]Ebrahe MohyJan 25, 2006 23:4632488
1To Ebrahe Mohy - heard of google ? [288 words]hrJan 27, 2006 06:3232488
So Ebrahy Mohe: did Omar al-Ghabra win in the election? [143 words]dhimmi no moreJan 30, 2006 13:2032488
The Truth [60 words]elachoFeb 1, 2006 09:0032488
Father Zakaria, the brave man [142 words]f.shaDec 18, 2006 22:4532488
if you want to understand islam go learn arabic first [103 words]nabilDec 29, 2006 01:3932488
I openly praise you for standing up as an honest muslim against ignorance [13 words]BrunoApr 26, 2007 15:2632488
Hr [86 words]BrunoApr 26, 2007 15:4532488
Father [50 words]Nathan D'MarcoApr 18, 2008 07:2432488
He Has been re-elected [7 words]J.S.Jan 24, 2006 15:4832344
I agree with Mr Pipes first lines [118 words]brunoJan 18, 2006 16:2031939
Change - For Bruno [15 words]Heather ClarkJan 21, 2006 20:1131939
German version of The Freedom Crusade, Revisited: A Symposium [119 words]SyreJan 17, 2006 14:1231820
Freedom of choice - choose wisely [168 words]PDMJan 16, 2006 21:2131767
No need to worry [77 words]Daniel SklarJan 16, 2006 15:1731741
Islam the religion of peace and Mr. al-Ghabra!! [81 words]dhimmi no moreJan 16, 2006 06:5831725
Scared [231 words]ScaredJan 31, 2006 17:3331725
Politics and Islam [417 words]HarrakJan 15, 2006 14:5331655
Do This! [71 words]ram gopalJan 13, 2006 00:1331549
Islam is a religion... [861 words]hrJan 1, 2006 07:0730882
Islam is a Cult [319 words]Gone FishingJul 19, 2017 15:0630882
Karma for Canada [211 words]Heather ClarkDec 31, 2005 00:4330824
IMP: Omar Alghabra wants Islamic Sharia Law in Canada [39 words]hrDec 27, 2005 06:5030623
1Very serious matter [39 words]E . YoussefDec 26, 2005 22:4930603
Oh lord open my closed eyes so that I may see [172 words]Habib AllahMar 20, 2007 03:4730603
1Canada, Friend or Foe [251 words]Thomas Earl CannadyDec 25, 2005 17:1630552
CCD Regrets Errors in its December 19 Press Release [1507 words]Al GordonDec 24, 2005 23:1330520
Canada and Islam [266 words]ddsDec 24, 2005 14:4430502
To DDS [174 words]hrJan 21, 2006 06:1730502
Mistakes in CCD release re Omar Alghabra [1509 words]Al GordonDec 24, 2005 11:5730492
Law of Karma [430 words]VenkatDec 24, 2005 00:2030478
He thanked ISNA in his acceptance speech. [7 words]PlaidShirtDec 23, 2005 23:3630476
Shouldn't Dr. Pipes correct his original comments? [115 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Sheram ShauhDec 23, 2005 13:5430457
AlGhabra is WEASLE [721 words]HRDec 23, 2005 05:5130443
1Canada in the footsteps of Israel [111 words]yuval brandstetterDec 22, 2005 15:4730420
Every single day, Yuval [31 words]Heather ClarkDec 23, 2005 21:2530420
How Canada chooses its' friends [413 words]WalterDec 21, 2005 20:1830381
Being an Islamist means never having to say you're sorry [90 words]Ben van de PolderDec 21, 2005 11:2230349
Canadians' Heads are buried in the Snow re: Islam and C Parrish [272 words]Jeff BercovitchDec 20, 2005 18:3730304
1Carolyn Parrish [79 words]DaveDec 20, 2005 16:2330290
More on Carolyn [21 words]ddsDec 23, 2005 12:1630290
Re: Dave (his views on) Carolyn Parrish - Vote Sucker [18 words]Heather ClarkDec 30, 2005 01:4730290
Serious questions remain despite the denials [90 words]Mark JamesDec 20, 2005 15:2930282
Just a matter of time [213 words]GitaDec 20, 2005 15:2430281

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to AlGhabra is WEASLE by HR

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List


eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)