|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Reaction to hostage takingReader comment on item: [Nepal and France:] Two Opposite Responses to Terrorism Submitted by Mitzi Alvin (United States), Sep 15, 2004 at 11:40 I don't see why the only possible reaction to hostage taking has to be violence against innocents (with a similar background to the hostage takers) or appeasement. Surely, there must be a third way. To my mind, the only group which has acted responsibly to what most people would consider unendurable terrorism has been the Israelis. Considering the pressures they are under and the resources they can bring to bear, they have shown a courage and restraint that is phenomenal...Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||