| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by gary fouse (United States), May 11, 2008 at 22:43
The on-going dispute at UC-Irvine (where I teach) over the Israel/Jewish/Muslim issue is bringing up (again) an unpleasant but obvious question; that is, the position of American Muslims in American society-especially since 9-11. Today, many American Muslims are feeling isolated, besieged, under suspicion, and forced to choose between their religion and their country. They know that so many Americans view them with suspicion and have developed a very negative perception of Islam as an intolerant religion trying to impose its will on the non-Muslim world. They resent the fact that America is a long-time ally of Israel and that most Americans support the right of that country to exist and to defend itself from attack.
To an extent, they have a point. Those feelings must be acknowledged and dealt with directly and honestly. In this article, I will try to do so in a civil manner, but many Muslims will not like what I have to say.
First of all, Americans in general do view Muslims here with a certain degree of suspicion. Since 9-11, we have tried to put it into some sort of perspective and not paint all Muslims with the same paintbrush. Certainly, most Muslims worldwide are not involved in terrorism, but that does not eliminate the fact that Islamic terror is a reality.
I think it also has to be stated that most Americans have been disappointed by the response of Muslims here to the whole terror issue. For the most part, there has been silence-either out of fear, apathy or sympathy with the terrorists. In many cases, organizations like CAIR have added to the resentment with their complaints of Islamophobia and discrimination. We had hoped that, after 9-11, American Muslims would have stood up and proclaimed to the Islamic world that they reject terror and stand with their nation in opposition to it. We have been disappointed.
We want to believe the phrase, "Islam is a religion of peace", but it is increasingly difficult to do so.
Also, the actions of many Muslim Student Organizations on numerous university campuses have only added fuel to the fire and increased suspicion. Many of the speakers they sponsor to come onto the campuses are virulent, racist, anti-Semitic, glorifying of terrorists and condemning of America as well. UCI is a prime example. When your sponsored speakers regularly speak in praise of Hamas and Hizbollah and condemn our own country, how can ordinary Americans feel that you are loyal? (Of course, the obvious response is that many walks of American life criticize our country, but Muslims must acknowledge that they sit in a unique position. People are going to listen to their radical speakers and draw negative conclusions. Sorry. That's just the way it is.) We also view with disgust the cowardly pandering of many on the academic left since it fits into their world view that the US and Israel are basically flawed, racist countries-which they are not.
Does that make America a nation of religious intolerance? No. You have to go back to the Salem Witch Trials to find true intolerance of religious issues. Though we have experienced forms of anti-Semitism, Jewish commentators like Dennis Prager and Michael Medved have expressed the thought that Jews have been able to prosper in America precisely because we are a predominantly Christian country that has traditionally tolerated all religions in our midst. That should never change.
In the case of Islam, we have welcomed Muslim immigrants and permitted them to construct their own places of worship. This is a form of tolerance that is not seen in many places in the Middle East, where any religion other than Islam is not permitted, or Egypt, where Coptic Christians are being persecuted as we speak (as are those of the Ba'hai faith in Iran). As for Jews in these countries, they have been already driven out. Many of us in the West are also aware of the poisonous education that Middle Eastern children receive that teaches them that Jews are nothing but apes and pigs.
It might be appropriate here to say a few words about our Jewish population in America. As a Gentile child in West Los Angeles, I grew up among Jewish families. Later, as a US serviceman, I was stationed with the Army just outside Nuremberg for over two years. Anyone with even a basic knowledge of the Third Reich is aware of Nuremberg's significance in that era. I not only visited the many sites made infamous by the Nazi era, I have also visited many of the Nazi's concentration camps, including Auschwitz (in Poland). It has left an indelible mark on me insofar as the subject of anti-Semitism is concerned because I have seen the residue of what anti-Semitism brings. Today, many of the same words, the same caricatures that were used by the Nazis to portray Jews are being repeated by many Muslims today. It must be confronted and exposed for what it is and not passed off as simply anti-Zionism.
Rightfully, or wrongfully, my perception of American Jews today is that of Americans going back generations. My perception of Muslims is one of recent immigrants though I recognize that many Muslims were born here. My point in stating this, perhaps in a nationalistic manner, is that I view the resurgence in anti-Semitism in our country as being largely imported from abroad. I don't have the empirical evidence to back that up, but that is simply my perception.
Many of us, in the wake of 9-11, have tried to learn more about this religion called Islam. Is it violent? Are the terrorists breaking away from true Islam-or merely putting it into practice? As Americans, we want to believe the former.
When we read the Koran, much of it reads like the Bible. Yet, there are disturbing passages that speak of killing infidels. Virtually every chapter refers to non-believers burning in Hell. (Christianity also has this as a tenet, but it is not repeated constantly throughout the Bible.) I believe the constant repetition of that principle instills a hatred for those who do not share the faith.
When we read the life of Mohammed, we are struck by the irrefutable fact that he was a soldier, a military leader who spread Islam at the point of a sword and was responsible for the deaths of thousands-through battles and executions. For a military leader, that is one thing; for a religious prophet, it is troubling to many of us non-Muslims.
Be that as it may, Americans are perfectly willing to concede that holy books can be interpreted different ways by different people, and to let Muslims worship as they choose without interference-as long as it doesn't impinge on the rest of us. One of my conservative blog co-respondents, convinced that Islam is a religion of hate and intolerance, argues that the US should outlaw Islam. I respectfully disagree since this would be counter to everything our country stands for. We also have to accept that this is a religion practiced by over a billion people world-wide-with whom we wish to live in peace.
Having said that, it must be stated that a free and democratic society like the US can never accept any religion, whatever it is, dictating our everyday life. In our society, we allow freedom to practice any-or no religion. We also have to accept certain freedoms that many of us do not approve of in terms of dress, art and sexuality. Muslims who choose to immigrate to America-or the West-must understand that we have freedoms that we would die to protect, and that we will never accept Shariah Law. That means that so-called "honor killings" and fatwas will be severely punished as any murder would be.
Yet, we do see forms of accommodation toward Muslims in America-and Europe. Certain state-run universities and airports are installing foot baths in rest rooms-in disregard of the separation of state and religion that would preclude the spending of government money for religious purposes. Muslim student unions, like the one at UCI, receive school funding taken from tuition fees. Do Muslims not recognize that the rest of us question that? Do they not understand our resentment when we read about Muslim cab drivers in places like Minneapolis who refuse to carry passengers because they are carrying alcohol? Or Muslim store clerks who refuse to check out customers purchasing pork? Do they not understand when some of us ask; "Who do they think they are?" Who did those "Flying Imams" think they were when they deliberately provoked airline passengers into complaining to the airline about their suspicious behavior, an incident that led to their being removed from the plane-then filing a lawsuit and trying to drag in the complaining passengers?
We also read about what many Muslims are doing in European countries that have accepted them. We see the demonstrations in the UK, where radicals wave posters calling for the beheading of those who defame Islam, call for the overthrow of British democracy and imposition of Shariah law. We read about the violent death of Theo van Gogh in the Netherlands at the hands of a Moroccan immigrant because he had the temerity to make a film critical of Islam's treatment of women. We see the riots over Danish cartoons, the riots in France, the Madrid train bombings, the London bombings and the despicable suicide bombings in Israel that kill hundreds of innocent men, women and children-killings that are cheered by some Muslim students and their chosen speakers on our campuses.
We read about people like Nonie Darwish, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Muslim heretics who have spoken out against the violence-and have to live in hiding under security.
Yes, we are suspicious of Muslims.
Finally, the question must be asked in all Western countries: Can Muslim immigrants really assimilate into our tolerant, open and democratic societies? Or is Islam incompatible with our form of society and our values? It may sound racist, but it is a legitimate question, and we must not shrink from asking it. We had previously thought that American Muslims were more assimilated than European Muslims since they came here with more education than their European, blue collar counterparts. Now we are wondering since radical thought spreads across socio-economic boundaries.
I can readily understand why Muslims here in America want to defend their faith. It is natural. I have said this before in my writings, but it bears repeating. Muslims should, indeed, defend Islam. But they don't need to defend it from non-Muslims. They need to defend it-to the death-from those violent terrorist elements that are bringing disrepute to Islam in the eyes of the entire non-Muslim world.
It comes down to this: If Muslims in America are willing to accept our values, warts and all, assimilate and be loyal, then they should be welcome and free to practice their religion in a peaceful and tolerant manner. However, if they feel that our values are in conflict with Islam, and they feel they cannot assimilate and be loyal Americans-even if it means taking up arms against other Muslims in the War on Terror, then, at the risk of being called Islamophobic, racist, xenophobic, or whatever you choose to call it, I can only repeat what former Prime Minister John Howard of Australia publicly proclaimed to his country's Muslims a couple of years back: He told them that if they could not accept Australian values, then they should return to where they came from.
I think that advice applies everywhere
Gary Fouse fousesquawk
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| moderate muslims [188 words] | alex | Aug 6, 2008 07:09 |
| The New Yorker's Cartoon on the Obama's deserves a bit of thought. [502 words] | Uni-faceted New Yorker Responses-let's be real! | Jul 14, 2008 16:27 |
| Islamism is not Bida [w/response] [492 words] | Archimedes2 | Jul 10, 2008 12:52 |
| NO MUSLIM IS OUR ALLY [212 words] | Jdamn13 | Jul 7, 2008 23:50 |
| Intellect and Reason will always win out [357 words] | Gabrielle Crofts | Jun 15, 2008 02:29 |
| Western Invention [68 words] | J Time | Jun 13, 2008 22:58 |
| Spot on [61 words] | Arif Jayish Al Amirki | Jun 2, 2008 21:39 |
| Islam is a political system not a religion [117 words] | Pablo | May 29, 2008 20:00 |
| ↔ To hell with political correctness! [370 words] | Nick4693 | Jul 12, 2008 21:04 |
| non Islamic Muslams.. [109 words] | donvan | May 27, 2008 10:58 |
| Moderates vs. Radicals [116 words] | Rebecca Moulds | May 21, 2008 08:04 |
| Muslims Against Terrorism [181 words] | Diana | May 19, 2008 19:47 |
| moderate... [108 words] | donvan | May 19, 2008 11:10 |
| religion could be bad [140 words] | aval31 | May 16, 2008 08:47 |
| ⇒ Why we are suspicious of Muslims [1921 words] | gary fouse | May 11, 2008 22:43 |
| ↔ Hi Gary [46 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | May 13, 2008 18:58 |
| ↔ Islam existing in freedom requires ignorance of Islamic scripture [563 words] | jennifer solis | May 16, 2008 03:04 |
| ↔ Muslims all over the world must learn to respect and be tolerant in order to gain respect and tolerance as well! [362 words] | TROY | May 31, 2008 07:48 |
| kuran hurts (and intends to hurt) non-muslims [123 words] | G.Vishvas | May 9, 2008 10:16 |
| it would be nice . . . [43 words] | Phil Greend | May 8, 2008 22:29 |
| An unfailing compass [116 words] | Victor Tordjman | May 5, 2008 21:57 |
| ↔ I concur completely with Victor. [97 words] | Mark | May 6, 2008 20:26 |
| Joshua Muravchik: the Walter Duranty of our times [116 words] | Timothy Hunter | May 5, 2008 11:36 |
| Joshua Muravchik concerning "Moderate Islamists" [121 words] | Sol Shalit | May 5, 2008 11:28 |
| ↔ Excellent Point [24 words] | jennifer solis | May 5, 2008 18:07 |
| Absolute Idolatry [931 words] | Prof. Paul Eidelberg | May 5, 2008 11:11 |
| Moderate Islamists (Muslims) [435 words] | Nick4693 | May 4, 2008 19:44 |
| 50+ "typos" in Commentary Magazine - Daniel Pipes is a gentleman [118 words] | jennifer solis | May 4, 2008 18:31 |
| Peaceful "Brotherhood"? (When donkeys fly) [90 words] | Edgar Malcolm Ervin | May 4, 2008 17:49 |
| Painful to see Muravchik lose even more credibility [165 words] | Edgar Malcolm Ervin | May 4, 2008 17:11 |
| When push comes... [91 words] | Randy Leeman | May 4, 2008 17:11 |
| A Bridge to "Moderate" Islam Is In Fact a Road to Hell [5706 words] | Amil Imani | May 4, 2008 15:50 |
| ↔ Amil, you hit the nail on the head! [565 words] | Nick4693 | May 6, 2008 20:18 |
| ↔ Mr. Imani, that was a very good expose of 'moderate Islamists' [42 words] | M.D'Souza | May 10, 2008 12:41 |
| Moderate Muslims? [85 words] | Margaret Hood | May 4, 2008 15:41 |
| ↔ Moderate Muslims [189 words] | janusz Kowalik | May 4, 2008 18:40 |
| Moderate Islamists and western strategy. [141 words] | janusz Kowalik | May 4, 2008 14:49 |
| "Moderate Islam" [75 words] | Gail Mitchell | May 4, 2008 14:03 |
| Muravchik's further response [91 words] | Judy Hershon | May 4, 2008 14:02 |
| The continuing mini-major fracas[ee] of mini-major sectaries.... [412 words] | Jascha Kessler | May 4, 2008 13:58 |
| Joshua Muravchik is rude and lost [548 words] | jennifer solis | May 3, 2008 20:46 |
| ↔ What is a moderate Muslim? [109 words] | Steve Klein | May 4, 2008 13:36 |
| ↔ Back to basics [249 words] | jennifer solis | May 5, 2008 02:34 |
| ↔ what "moderate" Muslim??? [96 words] | Jaladhi | May 6, 2008 21:50 |
| ↔ moderation is a virture, and a moderate Moslem is a virtuous Moslem [331 words] | trans-parere | May 7, 2008 08:41 |
| ↔ "Doing good" without objective perspective [213 words] | jennifer solis | May 8, 2008 18:42 |
| ↔ Moderater Muslims?...Yes, you do find them in India. [56 words] | M.D'Souza | May 9, 2008 17:45 |
| ↔ exemplify the positive [586 words] | trans-parere | May 9, 2008 19:10 |
| ↔ The "good nature" of man [628 words] | jennifer solis | May 11, 2008 02:40 |
| ↔ nothing cries louder than a liberal who can't impose their idealism on the guy they want to pay for that idealism [994 words] | trans-parere | May 12, 2008 22:57 |