Muravchik's further response

Submitted by Judy Hershon (United States), May 4, 2008 at 14:02

Following the Letters to the Editor in the May issue of Commentary was quite a match - I would love to read a further response to Muravchik's defense against Dr. Pipe's charge that Kamran Bokhari left a group which became more extreme after his departure, and Bukhari's letters chastising the Muslim commuity for excusing or indulging in terrorism, and what evidence in fact substantiates the fears that Bokhari is not in fact a moderate.

This is a fascinating exchange and I'm certain no reader of this publication wishes to be duped!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".