2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Amalekites, Saddam Hussien, and King Saul

Reader comment on item: Saddam's Damn Dam [i.e., The Mosul Dam]
in response to reader comment: what's in a name?

Submitted by jennifer solis (United States), Nov 9, 2007 at 15:25

King Saul was commanded by God to completely wipe out the Amalekites; and, while Saul killed a large number of them, he disobeyed God's instruction and left many alive, including a leader of theirs. When God asked Saul why he had disobeyed Him, Saul went on and on about bringing back the "spoils" of the battle so he could sacrifice them to God. God replied, "Be doers of the Word, not hearers of the Word."

Disobeying God brought divine discipline onto King Saul, and consequently Saul died a horrible, painful death.

King David, some fifteen years later, completely wiped out the Amalekites, and was phenominally blessed by God for it.

Trying to find applicable Biblical solution for the Iraq situation is difficult. The Bible does portray freedom through military victory, and the neccessity of war in defense of freedom, numerous times. When there is a clear victor, only then does peace result, depending on who the victor is.

The Bible also teaches, with freedom comes responsibility. Daniel Pipes is so far the closest to this doctrine, when he writes about removing our troops to the borders of Iraq, providing only strategical military strikes when warrented. This would force the Iraqis to step up to the plate and determine their fate.

Saddam was a threat to OUR security, and Israel's, and therefore it was justifiable, Biblically speaking, to take him out.

What to do afterwards is the dilema. Imagine, for a moment, the U.S. was THE VICTOR in all this. That Iraq was OURS to do with what we pleased. Leave out the "mubo-jumbo" about "freedom is the Almighty's gift to every human being", etc., sorry, President Bush, it's not, and there is no Biblical doctine supporting that. Man was created with "volition", and some use it for good, some for bad.

Say, for example, it was established and clear that Iraq lost the war, under Saddam, and the U.S. won, under President Bush, and we had the sovereignty to do with Iraq as we wished. That would be the U.S. comming from a position of strength. The U.S. should have written the Iraq Constitution, same as General Douglas MacCarthur did for the Japanese after WWII. This would include separation of "Mosque" and state.

In my opinion, the initial military operation in Iraq stopped way too soon. The looting should have been delt with severely, militarily.

Every time, whenever our soldiers were shot at, be it from a school, hospital, or Mosque, the bulding should have been obliterated.

It should have been established who were and what was the new rule of law. Back when Saddam's statue was pulled down, and Iraqis were jumping up and down, applauding the U.S., it was not because the Iraqi people were happy to have a new democracy. They didn't, and still don't quite comprehend what democracy is.

It was because they were glad Saddam was gone.

It was because they assumed, feared and respected, that the new "leader" was the U.S.

The U.S. has turned out not to be the leader in Iraq, to the detriment of the Iraqis.

Daniel Pipes is exactly right when he states that democracy was introduced way too soon, and gone about the wrong way, from the top down, instead of the bottom up.

The current "surge", which is working, involves various tribal militias maintaining order as well as more "lee-way" and aggressive military action on behalf of our soldiers.

There wasn't a clear victor after taking Saddam out. This is the crux of the problem. If the U.S. was the victor, we should have implimented a Constitution ourselves, enforced it militarily, established a rule of law, enforced it militarily, and if worst came to worst and the masses in Iraq tried to rise up against our troops, we should have pulled our troops and bombed them again.

Syria, Iran, and Turkey would be watching all this and no-way would they want to get involved.

Again, once a CLEAR victor was established, namely the U.S., and Iraq was ours, then and only then handing over power to Iraqis, little by little, say for instance to small provinces to start with, would have made sense.

How to pay for all this? Take the $700 million + used for that huge U.S. embassy being built in Iraq and instead secure the oil production in Iraq.

And build a new damn dam.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (49) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
American Invasion on Iraq was the Biggest Mistake Since Vietnam [59 words]Nadhim MohammedNov 24, 2015 01:52226529
1The real victims [49 words]dhimmi no moreNov 24, 2015 07:17226529
Exactly the truth! [255 words]GWKNov 21, 2007 21:47114300
15 meters? [46 words]downstreamNov 27, 2007 10:23114300
Dam problem [145 words]always rightNov 13, 2007 17:37113645
Must Leave Iraq [104 words]MichaelNov 13, 2007 16:40113642
Saddam's Damn Dam [262 words]Kim SegarNov 13, 2007 14:07113637
Dang It! [331 words]shaynaNov 12, 2007 15:44113610
Teach the Iraqis how to sue the "German-Italian, Saudi funded Consortium" that built it? [134 words]RPaineNov 11, 2007 13:28113569
Time to go [126 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDNov 10, 2007 15:33113548
Prophetic Implications in the Shadow of the Dam [945 words]M. ToveyNov 13, 2007 12:21113548
Preempt the conspiracy risk [329 words]Lee M.Nov 9, 2007 23:03113533
Noah's Ark? [53 words]Vince MNov 9, 2007 13:54113516
enough [152 words]chuck byardNov 9, 2007 11:50113514
Not only, but also [30 words]MarkNov 12, 2007 17:33113514
"Social Work" [127 words]M. BouffantNov 9, 2007 03:08113503
Resulte of American Presence [173 words]E. N. Mayfield, Jr.Nov 10, 2007 03:42113503
Thou art so wrong [154 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDNov 11, 2007 16:29113503
Colin Powell [31 words]Steve J.Nov 9, 2007 02:49113502
Pottery Barn rule [41 words]Bill TempletonNov 9, 2007 16:24113502
What?? [144 words]donvanNov 16, 2007 09:07113502
Damn Dam [41 words]E. N. Mayfield, Jr.Nov 9, 2007 02:30113500
Geology Exemplified at Its Worst [126 words]Christopher J. SchuberthNov 8, 2007 22:23113494
Our New Embassy [24 words]KathyNov 8, 2007 21:42113491
Damn Dam that Damn Saddam [233 words]Seamus MacNemiNov 8, 2007 19:43113470
Consequences if One Does, or One Does Not [255 words]M. ToveyNov 8, 2007 17:16113465
The Germans built it - let them fix it [13 words]HbowmanNov 8, 2007 16:46113463
Purpose of War [25 words]Mike LevineNov 8, 2007 16:31113461
True... [114 words]donvanNov 9, 2007 10:35113461
Empty the reservoir! [37 words]Ron KilmartinNov 8, 2007 15:01113436
Another example .... [105 words]donvanNov 8, 2007 16:33113436
surging success? [117 words]G.VishvasNov 8, 2007 11:50113430
caught in the Iraqi-occupation dilemma? [169 words]Charles MartelNov 8, 2007 10:45113425
Saddam's sad folly [247 words]Rebecca MouldsNov 8, 2007 08:54113418
but why is the US there? [63 words]roslyn estherNov 8, 2007 08:53113417
what's in a name? [449 words]DrewNov 8, 2007 08:46113415
Did Somebody Call A Prophet From G-D? [128 words]Seamus MacNemiNov 8, 2007 20:14113415
Amalekites, Saddam Hussien, and King Saul [730 words]jennifer solisNov 9, 2007 15:25113415
But what was the commandment? [277 words]DrewNov 15, 2007 10:19113415
Salvation is the Almighty's Gift [132 words]jennifer solisNov 16, 2007 13:56113415
Saddam's Dam [171 words]J. GutknechtNov 8, 2007 08:45113414
Saddam's Damn Dam - handing over responsiblilty to avoid blame - impossible [143 words]DW Tony PattersonNov 8, 2007 07:48113412
Do what we must.... [194 words]Ron RotemNov 8, 2007 07:46113411
Seeing clearly [81 words]Mary ConnorNov 8, 2007 06:44113409
Dam Saddam's Dam? [99 words]Ian CampbellNov 8, 2007 06:07113394
Since a decade Iran and Iraq were eachothers #1 enemy! And now they are best friends? [194 words]zari namdarNov 8, 2007 05:04113391
Who built it [66 words]David W. LincolnNov 7, 2007 23:19113379
When The Levee Breaks Have No Place To Run [139 words]Richard B.Nov 7, 2007 22:52113377
Saddam's Dam [154 words]Donald W. BalesNov 7, 2007 21:20113374

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Amalekites, Saddam Hussien, and King Saul by jennifer solis

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)