69 million page views

Ancients Revisited - Semitic Semantics versus Non-Semitic Semantics

Reader comment on item: "Godless Saracens Threatening Destruction":
in response to reader comment: Reading Q112:1 and 112:2 and a mix of Arabic, Syriac and Hebrew

Submitted by M Tovey (United States), Jan 6, 2021 at 15:30

No apologies necessary for your handling of this lesson in the language of the ancients. Centuries of tampering with the legacies of those who attempted to appropriate truth and obfuscating the principles of religion for the sake of empire are the undergirding of researching such ideologies; and as Dr. Pipes' forum here as been educational in the processes for this observer to realize not all that is seen is reality, so too all that was considered rational in the past is revealed for the deception that has been perpetrated on all of humanity's societies, not just in the Middle East.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)