69 million page views

Geneva Iranian Accords

Reader comment on item: The Geneva Agreement with Iran: A Foreign Policy Disaster

Submitted by Gunther H. Sciff (United States), Nov 26, 2013 at 18:25

I am surprised that your article - like the careless Press - fails to give credit to the fact that a numberof powerful nations must have agreed to the temporary pact with Iran, unlike Chamberlain who alone represented the sole naion that negotiated the pact with Hitler. I do not know at this point what the text of the agreement is, but 6 months of limited reduction of the sanctions - again I do not know what was sanctioons were eased, or the extent of the easing but a 6 months interlude instead of the war that apparently is Israel's only suggestion, can be safely postponed, rather than leaving armed conflict the only solution. Iran has been working on its 'atom tipped missile' for a number years, so 6 months of reduced activity seems to me probablyi a viable deal.

Gunther H. Schiff

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

actually, you are wrong about Munich, for the French prime minister was there along with the British one. See the commemorative picture athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-R69173,_M%C3%BCnchener_Abkommen,_Staatschefs.jpg

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Geneva Iranian Accords by Gunther H. Sciff

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)