69 million page views

Alternative Proposal, Dr. Pipes

Reader comment on item: What's the Goal in Libya?

Submitted by Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi (United Kingdom), Jun 17, 2011 at 20:49

Dr. Pipes:

How about just encouraging NATO to step up its efforts to ' finish the job', get rid of Qaddafi, and make it clear to the Transition Council that any Islamist aggression emanating from Libya in the future will be met with severe retaliation?

Your scenario of assisting whichever Libya is the better of the two seems unrealistic: supposing it turns out to be Qaddafi's Tripolitania and Fezzan, do you really think he would want to accept any Western support to regain control over the whole country? Even so, given his brutal tactics, I have serious moral reservations over providing any help for his regime to acquire territory. Don't you?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

Making it clear to the next rulers that they have to follow our wishes sounds unrealistic to me.

I am not proposing help for Qaddafi to stay in power, just stopping short of overthrowing him.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)