69 million page views

Our dear Mullah and the law

Reader comment on item: Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi Women
in response to reader comment: Mahram Despotism vs. Saudi Women

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 27, 2009 at 07:28

Our dear Mullah whose ancestors the Hindus were brutalized by the religion of the Arabs and their imperialism wrote

>I refer to that as the law. The final law.

"The final law"! You mean the shari3a right our dear Mullah? well would you incorporate the likes of rida3at al-kabeer wa shurb bool al-ba3eer in your final law?

For the readers: there is an infamous hadith attributed to 3Ai'sha which is supposed to be part of islamic law (and please do not laugh) and it is as follows: a woman can have a platonic relationship with a man if she breast feed him (yes breast feed him and you are reading it correctly) not once but five times

Oh shurb bool al-ba3eer? it is drinking camel's urine or what I call Muslim penicillin!

Well these sordid ahadith are the final law of Allah

So much for the final law

>The common law is that of the predecessor or what you term precedents, the past cases where the judge rolls his thumbs and thinks what to apply after the many bygones cases. What is the best fit? This is not in Islam.

So what is it in islam? Let me help you: long time ago in distant Mesopotamia and Iran the ulama selected every possible legal problem and proposed a "final solution" for such legal problem and all the Muslim qadi has to do is to check his books and find the solution and the examples can be indeed funny as in the above two examples

So would you allow your daughter or your wife to breat feed a male co-worker our dear Mullah? Well this is your Allah's final law

> We have one the Quran.

Wrong! The rule of the Qur'an in al-shari3a is minimal at best and case in point is ayat al-jald and ayat al-rajm where if you read the Qur'an you will not find anything about ayat al-rajm but in the shari3a it is the punishment for al-zina. Oh the Arabic? I do not translate Arabic for wannabe arabs like you

For the readers: 1. Ayat al-rajm is the stoning verse but such verse does not exist in the Qur'an and we are told that it was written on a palm leaf that was eaten by a hungry goat and this is why you will not find it in the Qur'an. Then later on the ulama trying to justify the absurd tell us that in actual fact this is a case of aborgation (al-nasikh wa al-mansukh or the Allah changing his mind doctrine) or the so called nusikha harfuhu wa baqiya hukmuhu or in plain English it does not exist in the Qur'an but it is the law! I'm not you kidding here

2. Ignaz Goldziher believed that the shari3a is no more than Roman law of the late antique period that was re-arranged by the ulama in distant Iran and Mesopotamia in the 2-3 centuires of islam and made to be Allah's law.

Patricia Crone believes that the shari3a is no more than provincial law of the late antique period (as in the case of Egypt and Syria)

So much for the law of Allah

>The kadhis and the courts based on these.

No it is called al-ahadith and do us a favor and stick to Urdu

>Not being a Muslim and you living in the UK it is very difficult to explain this in simple English as both the Indian and Islam law are out from UK.

"islam law" is out of the UK? really?

>India had the first laws that migrated to UK; the laws in UK are based on these laws modified. Read Law by Mulla The lawyer

Islamic gobbledygook

< he has four volumes and you will see a lot of the Indian precedent now polished Islam cannot be translated by you or I as we have scanty knowledge in Arabic.

Oh so you do not know any Arabic our dear Mullah right? I'm not surpised after all islam is really the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only as per Q14:4 and you ain't no Arab

I urge you to abandon islam and be free again

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Our dear Mullah and the law by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)