Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Go read "The Art of War", etc.
Reader comment on item: War's New Face

Submitted by Deran Eaton (United States), Apr 17, 2003 at 09:28

"Changing nature of warfare????" How do you figure, Dr. Pipes??

Have you ever read Sun Tzu's "The Art of War", which dates back over 2 1/2 millenia? Napoleon Bonaparte was likely the first Western leader to read it; today it's required reading at U.S. military academies.

As a usually serious student of Middle Eastern history, please remember all the way back to the founding of Babylon (a.k.a. "Babel"). The best reference here is the Bible, which also has good counsel on waging war effectively -- often better than Sun Tzu's. Habitual violence among Middle Eastern leaders is nothing new. Even Saddam Hussein fancied himself as as a modern-day Nebuchadnezzar.

The bottom line is two fold:
1. The nature of warfare has not changed at all, only the contestants and the technology.
2. The so-called "West"/"non-West" contestants are motivated by different spirits that determine their domestic, tactical and strategic dispositions.

Also, one correction: The U.S. is NOT -- and never was -- a democracy!! Go read Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution....which begins:

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government..."
Sincerely,

DSE

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title By Date
Chuck Wagen HAGEL -- DHIMMI OF THE MONTH [68 words]james burkeOct 30, 2009 08:04
War's New Face [124 words]H. BendorAug 4, 2003 10:58
A joke? [32 words]Plain TruthApr 21, 2003 22:50
governing relgion [220 words]Paul WilliamApr 20, 2003 23:58
Hooray! [31 words]Richard munsonApr 20, 2003 21:35
My comments to Garry Prior: [177 words]Jeanne GravesApr 20, 2003 09:44
You Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet! [131 words]AvrahamApr 19, 2003 23:14
Great Minds Think Alike [98 words]Arlinda DeAngelisApr 19, 2003 17:00
Bravery vs. stupidity [74 words]M. SimonApr 19, 2003 16:37
marketing wars new face... [372 words]Marc MolinoApr 18, 2003 15:17
US of A [220 words]Mike O'HearnApr 18, 2003 09:17
But has it been effective? [281 words]Tom PensylApr 17, 2003 23:01
We Can't Afford War and Restoration [124 words]catherineIHApr 17, 2003 19:21
Another decline: Disappearance of treason? [98 words]F VoshellApr 17, 2003 16:21
Competitive Advantage [95 words]Bill HadneyApr 17, 2003 15:47
Well written and persuasive [2 words]George W. Kunzman, Jr.Apr 17, 2003 15:32
Changes in modern warfare [443 words]Doug PetrillaApr 17, 2003 15:25
The face of war obscured.... [392 words]Shep FargotsteinApr 17, 2003 14:04
Changing culture [84 words]Chad DesLauriersApr 17, 2003 12:43
War with a new face [143 words]Vasudev GodboleApr 17, 2003 10:42
⇒ Go read "The Art of War", etc. [185 words]Deran EatonApr 17, 2003 09:28
Let's change the language of war [583 words]Garry PriorApr 17, 2003 02:58
timidity of non-hostile moslems [73 words]Joseph WechslerApr 16, 2003 21:52
What to do About Arafat [77 words]Paul M. NevilleApr 16, 2003 19:53
Changing face of war [181 words]Chip SwitzerApr 16, 2003 17:28
Words save blood - so give words a chance [235 words]Glen WishardApr 16, 2003 17:25
only half of the story [30 words]Steve SaafApr 16, 2003 16:21
We show them our tactics [207 words]Del Jones, CPPApr 16, 2003 16:18
Article on Transformation of War [178 words]David BrownApr 16, 2003 09:47
Paradoxical [229 words]Glenn KlotzApr 16, 2003 08:57

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page