Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

We show them our tactics
Reader comment on item: War's New Face

Submitted by Del Jones, CPP (United States), Apr 16, 2003 at 16:18

Amazingly, we show the enemy how our vehicles move forward, during the attack, in realtime over the TV airwaves. If I am an enemy commander, I videotape the broadcast, show it to my soldiers, point out the distance between the tanks, show them the grill doors outside the engine compartment and say "this is where they are most vulnerable: hit them there with your RPGs". [It wasn't hard for me to gage where the main body of the 3dID was during their advance.] Then I'd rehearse the attack, lie in wait alongside the most likely avenues of approach; if a target of opportunity (eg, a Maintenance Co. [Note: Army Maint. Co.personnel became POWs after a sandstorm] presented itself, I'd attack it. Hopefully, military censors will delay TV transmissions at least an hour (so they can blip out tactically important info) in the future. I am currently finishing a military history book titled: The Persian Gulf Wars-Conflict of Cultures. If you are interested in collaborating on such a book or can write in Arabic, please contact me. I served for 23 years as an Army Officer. Four years as a Tank Company Officer(3 yrs with the 64th Armor, 3d Infantry Division. I have taught History at Mercer University.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (30) on this item

Title By Date
Chuck Wagen HAGEL -- DHIMMI OF THE MONTH [68 words]james burkeOct 30, 2009 08:04
War's New Face [124 words]H. BendorAug 4, 2003 10:58
A joke? [32 words]Plain TruthApr 21, 2003 22:50
governing relgion [220 words]Paul WilliamApr 20, 2003 23:58
Hooray! [31 words]Richard munsonApr 20, 2003 21:35
My comments to Garry Prior: [177 words]Jeanne GravesApr 20, 2003 09:44
You Ain't Seen Nothin' Yet! [131 words]AvrahamApr 19, 2003 23:14
Great Minds Think Alike [98 words]Arlinda DeAngelisApr 19, 2003 17:00
Bravery vs. stupidity [74 words]M. SimonApr 19, 2003 16:37
marketing wars new face... [372 words]Marc MolinoApr 18, 2003 15:17
US of A [220 words]Mike O'HearnApr 18, 2003 09:17
But has it been effective? [281 words]Tom PensylApr 17, 2003 23:01
We Can't Afford War and Restoration [124 words]catherineIHApr 17, 2003 19:21
Another decline: Disappearance of treason? [98 words]F VoshellApr 17, 2003 16:21
Competitive Advantage [95 words]Bill HadneyApr 17, 2003 15:47
Well written and persuasive [2 words]George W. Kunzman, Jr.Apr 17, 2003 15:32
Changes in modern warfare [443 words]Doug PetrillaApr 17, 2003 15:25
The face of war obscured.... [392 words]Shep FargotsteinApr 17, 2003 14:04
Changing culture [84 words]Chad DesLauriersApr 17, 2003 12:43
War with a new face [143 words]Vasudev GodboleApr 17, 2003 10:42
Go read "The Art of War", etc. [185 words]Deran EatonApr 17, 2003 09:28
Let's change the language of war [583 words]Garry PriorApr 17, 2003 02:58
timidity of non-hostile moslems [73 words]Joseph WechslerApr 16, 2003 21:52
What to do About Arafat [77 words]Paul M. NevilleApr 16, 2003 19:53
Changing face of war [181 words]Chip SwitzerApr 16, 2003 17:28
Words save blood - so give words a chance [235 words]Glen WishardApr 16, 2003 17:25
only half of the story [30 words]Steve SaafApr 16, 2003 16:21
⇒ We show them our tactics [207 words]Del Jones, CPPApr 16, 2003 16:18
Article on Transformation of War [178 words]David BrownApr 16, 2003 09:47
Paradoxical [229 words]Glenn KlotzApr 16, 2003 08:57

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page