|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Silesia or Cilicia?Reader comment on item: Next Steps in Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process Submitted by Peter (United States), Mar 1, 2007 at 07:41 I believe Rep. Sherman spoke of Cilicia (southern Asia Minor) rather than Silesia. It was once a Roman province, whose most famous native son was Paul the Apostle (he was a Jew of the city of Tarsus). In the middle ages, Cilicia was the site of an Armenian state; today it is part of Turkey. And I think Rep. Sherman has a point. Why doesn't the US make it a point in discussions over the future of the Falastin Arabs that the Arab states which took in Falastin refugees naturalize them and their descendants. After all, is the USA can do it, why can't Egypt and Syria? Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||