33 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

The Best Review, Yet
Reader comment on article: Does Israel Need a Plan?

Submitted by Don Skupsky (United States), Feb 3, 2003 at 12:04

Thank you Daniel! "Does Israel Need a Plan?" provides the most complete and valid approach yet presented.

No major conflict has ever been resolved by negotiations, while one party still believed it could defeat the other. There is no need for negotiations for just a "piece of the pie" when you know that sooner or later you can get the whole pie.

Israel has tried it all. Both Jordan and Egypt made peace with Israel After they concluded they could not win, and both realized they had more to gain by moving forward (including a huge amount of desperately needed money from the US). So the conflict with those two countries have effectively ended.

Clearly, this conflict has never been about a Palestinian state. The Palestinians could have had a state in 1948, between 1948 and 1967 when Jordan and Egypt occupied the land allocated for their state, after 1993 by conforming to the Oslo accords, in 2000 at Camp David, and even today by renouncing terrorist, re-educating their population, reforming their government and accepting peace with Israel.

So, instead of wanting their own state, they want somebody else's state ... Israel. Sadly, so many countries and people don't have the slightest clue what is going on. They view the Palestinians as a "repressed people", when in fact they repress themselves. Their leadership and the Arab world have been their worst enemy.

I still believe, and I know Yasir Arafat would hate to hear this, but Israel is the best friend the Palestinians have. It is only country in the world who understands their plight and is ready to help them achieve peace.

But, the Palestinians must wake up and realize that its peace they want . . . not Israel. I remember in July 2000, before the latest Intifada, the Palestinian economy was great, Palestinians were flooding over the border for good jobs in Israel, terriorism was low and progress was being made toward Palestinian self determination. Now, the Palestinians have over 60% unemployment and significant suffering. What has this round brought them: neither peace, nor prosperity, nor a Palestinian state.

Its time for the Palestinians to admit defeat and permanently give up the dream of Israel as their homeland. Then there can be peace!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date
"the right road to peace" [383 words]shukiJul 5, 2007 18:53
I agree with the ONLY DEFINITION of "GENOCIDE BOMBERS" [212 words]ADec 18, 2005 10:23
Two Nations, Two Walls [705 words]Karel SykoraJun 4, 2005 11:57
A Plan [171 words]Murray SmithMar 6, 2004 13:26
Close, but no cigar [449 words]Ray ExleyFeb 3, 2004 05:50
Stated as it is [78 words]RenirobertsFeb 2, 2004 20:15
whos side is England on? [80 words]Benjamin Curd {14 year old}Jan 21, 2004 16:50
God bless Daniel Pipes [24 words]Albert PintoDec 29, 2003 16:22
My Take on the Israeli/Palestinian dilemma [1569 words]Hector FernandezNov 7, 2003 10:07
Thank God for Daniel Pipes. [5 words]Christina FoltzJun 5, 2003 20:52
Transfer is still the only way [217 words]RayMay 30, 2003 03:47
Aren't we forgetting Islam [377 words]Y Brandstetter MDApr 24, 2003 08:21
What the left demands [209 words]JonathanMar 4, 2003 17:16
Thank You
[w/response] [271 words]
Paula KirbyMar 4, 2003 11:15
difficult problem [175 words]joyceFeb 19, 2003 10:06
One question [153 words]CharlesFeb 12, 2003 07:16
Your advocacy of "total victory" is misguided. [202 words]Luke TakeuchiFeb 8, 2003 04:59
Why not another idea? [240 words]V. ThogersenFeb 4, 2003 17:35
Strategic Thinking for Israel (by an Israeli) [1614 words]Yirmeyahu Ben-David, Paqid 16Feb 4, 2003 11:34
Does Israel Need a Plan
[w/response] [61 words]
Val WidgrenFeb 4, 2003 10:51
The Arabs' mentality in a nut shell [190 words]Jonathan LipshutzFeb 4, 2003 06:51
Does Israel has a plan? [56 words]Muhammad SiddiquiFeb 4, 2003 00:54
"Genocide Bombers" [213 words]Jacob WolfowiczFeb 3, 2003 22:21
Winning the Peace [101 words]Ken GoldsteinFeb 3, 2003 15:34
The Palestinian State of Terror [555 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 3, 2003 14:46
Anti- Zionism in Western Euope [57 words]M. NadlerFeb 3, 2003 14:03
The Impossible Dream [103 words]J. SpiroFeb 3, 2003 13:39
Train of thought ran off the Track [273 words]Isaiah520Feb 3, 2003 13:39
plan !!! [60 words]plainolcitizenFeb 3, 2003 12:28
no cloudy, smokey apparitions here [24 words]Bruce A. BirnbergFeb 3, 2003 12:16
⇒ The Best Review, Yet [371 words]Don SkupskyFeb 3, 2003 12:04
Response to "Does Israel Need a Plan" [427 words]robert goldsteinFeb 3, 2003 11:25
Who in the U.S. govt will move on this? [113 words]Mel KusinFeb 3, 2003 11:21
Clarity at last [60 words]Rivka MuskatFeb 3, 2003 11:00
Victory [6 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 3, 2003 09:55
Plans are not the answer! [46 words]Robert AbramsFeb 3, 2003 09:05
Truths are recognizable... [49 words]Kerry AndersonFeb 3, 2003 05:41
Ignoring complicity. [279 words]Timothy P. BrownFeb 3, 2003 01:51
Dr. Pipes clearly defined the "problem" and the solution is obvious! [91 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 3, 2003 01:49
Pipes = Genius [89 words]steve frederickFeb 3, 2003 00:14
Western assumptions may be false. [644 words]A.F.Feb 3, 2003 00:09
discussion on chatboard [84 words]Joe KeysorFeb 2, 2003 23:19
What's wrong with Jordan? [585 words]ShaharFeb 2, 2003 22:57
"Speak soft but carry a big stick"(T. Roosevelt) [293 words]alexFeb 2, 2003 22:46
Defining Motivation [219 words]E. J. BlumbergFeb 2, 2003 22:25
a question about Oslo [309 words]Susan KriegerFeb 2, 2003 22:18
Other Arab Nations?? [66 words]A. J.Feb 2, 2003 22:17
Underlying problem in Palestine [82 words]Wallace L. CooperFeb 2, 2003 21:34
What comes first? [221 words]Boris FrenkelFeb 2, 2003 20:58
peace in the middle east [45 words]robert mandreshFeb 2, 2003 20:10
Should Israel be invited to join NATO? [739 words]Sam LewisFeb 2, 2003 16:53
Does Israel Need a Plan [39 words]Yale RichmoindFeb 2, 2003 16:43
For how long can TRUTH be ignored? [88 words]Salomon BenzimraFeb 2, 2003 16:21
Brilliant! [75 words]Mort ReichekFeb 2, 2003 15:20
The Iron Fist is Not the Answer [471 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 2, 2003 14:07
Religious fanaticism [185 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 2, 2003 13:38
excellent analysis [199 words]Alfred DukeszFeb 2, 2003 13:37
Excellent analysis [131 words]martin kesslerFeb 2, 2003 13:18
Query [57 words]David FawcettFeb 2, 2003 13:05
Kahanne was too late and too early [44 words]Norman WandFeb 2, 2003 12:48
well-conceived analysis [108 words]Michelle TuchmanFeb 2, 2003 12:02
Israel's "plan"
[w/response] [150 words]
David SchechterFeb 2, 2003 11:43
The only solution for peace in Israel [134 words]Jordan HoltzFeb 2, 2003 11:21
The Unobviousness and Uncommoness of Obvious Common Sense [108 words]S. Matthew PrasteinFeb 2, 2003 11:21
A Clear Vision [40 words]Thea (Tzippi) RiiseFeb 2, 2003 11:12
Thanks for posting it! [31 words]CookitFeb 2, 2003 11:09
Tough problems require tough solutions! [109 words]Kevin HandleyFeb 2, 2003 10:49

Comment on Does Israel Need a Plan?

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to The Best Review, Yet by reader Don Skupsky

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site ©1979-2008 Daniel Pipes. Email: meqmef@aol.com