4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

What's wrong with Jordan?

Reader comment on item: Does Israel Need a [Peace] Plan?

Submitted by Shahar (United States), Feb 2, 2003 at 22:57

What's wrong with Jordan as a Palestinian State? Why should there be two Arab states in Palestine, one of them cut like a cookie out of Israel along with the crumbs of Gaza? Should there be two independent Jewish States in Palestine as well?

Mr. Pipes main argument against Jordan as Palestine is that Palestinians don't seem to want it that way. Some parts of this very article undermine this argument. One is the theme itself, capitulation. If the Arabs are to accept defeat, it seems a quibbling matter what the exact terms of their defeat actually are, especially considering that they are not likely to *want* any of those terms. The other point is that what they do apparently want, the death of Zionism, is non-negotiable.

The other argument presented here, that Jordan will simply become a new base of operations against Israel, makes only partial sense. It's difficult to imagine a better base to act against Israel than what would be a new Palestinian state. In contrast, Jordan would have a significant interest in preventing such operations, especially after a war in Iraq. Moreover, Jordan would have a greater ability to act against terrorism, both politically and materially, than any state the refugee population could possibly give rise to.

Concerning the Palestinians themselves, if we have any regard for their demand of self determination and democracy, Jordan looks even more valuable as a solution. In an argument similar to the ones I've already given, the King is likely to prove a far more friendly and progressive partner in the project of representative government for the Arabs of Palestine than Arafat or any successor would or could be. If the question is a political life in which the interest of the people are represented, you can't go very far more wrong than any of the organizations that currently claim to represent the Palestinian people. Nor is any improvement likely. With the territory poised, as it is, like a knife at Israel's throat, a newly formed state on that land will always, at best, be in a state of tension with the Jewish state. Good fences make good neighbors, and in Jordan there is much more opportunity for the constant flow of political progress that we associate with a modern democracy. A west bank/gaza state could never overcome its built in tensions.

Finally, Netanyahu, for one, does not seem to believe that Jordanian citizenship for the Palestinians would require that they leave their homes in Israel. I agree. They would become foreign nationals and would remain safe.

The win-win deal here, the one that would address the rights of the Palestinians to self determination and a political life, Israeli security and frankly Israel's right to its own land, is Jordanian citizenship for the Palestinians.

Terms of surrender? Wouldn't this mean that Jordan is also surrendering, even though Israel and Jordan at not strictly at war? Well, yes. This is a proxy war, and a meaningful surrender would have to mean that the whole community supporting this war accept both culpability for the war itself and responsibility for its resolution. That community is large, even larger than the Arab world.

Can they all surrender? Will the United Nations surrender to Israel? As much as I'd like to see that, the reality will be that somebody is going to have to take the fall. I nominate Jordan. In light of recent news stories, there's reason to think that such a fall could be cushioned and even lead to a stronger Jordan.

Shahar
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (67) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
"the right road to peace" [383 words]shukiJul 5, 2007 18:53103051
I agree with the ONLY DEFINITION of "GENOCIDE BOMBERS" [212 words]ADec 18, 2005 10:2330138
Two Nations, Two Walls [705 words]Karel SykoraJun 4, 2005 11:5722556
A Plan [171 words]Murray SmithMar 6, 2004 13:2614104
Close, but no cigar [449 words]Ray ExleyFeb 3, 2004 05:5013674
Stated as it is [78 words]RenirobertsFeb 2, 2004 20:1513671
whos side is England on? [80 words]Benjamin Curd {14 year old}Jan 21, 2004 16:5013474
God bless Daniel Pipes [24 words]Albert PintoDec 29, 2003 16:2212987
My Take on the Israeli/Palestinian dilemma [1569 words]Hector FernandezNov 7, 2003 10:0712102
Thank God for Daniel Pipes. [5 words]Christina FoltzJun 5, 2003 20:529406
Transfer is still the only way [217 words]RayMay 30, 2003 03:479293
Aren't we forgetting Islam [377 words]Y Brandstetter MDApr 24, 2003 08:218650
What the left demands [209 words]JonathanMar 4, 2003 17:167070
Thank You [271 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Paula KirbyMar 4, 2003 11:157051
difficult problem [175 words]joyceFeb 19, 2003 10:066771
One question [153 words]CharlesFeb 12, 2003 07:166582
Your advocacy of "total victory" is misguided. [202 words]Luke TakeuchiFeb 8, 2003 04:596493
Why not another idea? [240 words]V. ThogersenFeb 4, 2003 17:356394
Strategic Thinking for Israel (by an Israeli) [1614 words]Yirmeyahu Ben-David, Paqid 16Feb 4, 2003 11:346370
Does Israel Need a Plan [61 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Val WidgrenFeb 4, 2003 10:516368
The Arabs' mentality in a nut shell [190 words]Jonathan LipshutzFeb 4, 2003 06:516347
Does Israel has a plan? [56 words]Muhammad SiddiquiFeb 4, 2003 00:546343
"Genocide Bombers" [213 words]Jacob WolfowiczFeb 3, 2003 22:216339
Winning the Peace [101 words]Ken GoldsteinFeb 3, 2003 15:346332
The Palestinian State of Terror [555 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 3, 2003 14:466331
Anti- Zionism in Western Euope [57 words]M. NadlerFeb 3, 2003 14:036329
The Impossible Dream [103 words]J. SpiroFeb 3, 2003 13:396328
Train of thought ran off the Track [273 words]Isaiah520Feb 3, 2003 13:396327
plan !!! [60 words]plainolcitizenFeb 3, 2003 12:286320
no cloudy, smokey apparitions here [24 words]Bruce A. BirnbergFeb 3, 2003 12:166319
The Best Review, Yet [371 words]Don SkupskyFeb 3, 2003 12:046318
Response to "Does Israel Need a Plan" [427 words]robert goldsteinFeb 3, 2003 11:256317
Who in the U.S. govt will move on this? [113 words]Mel KusinFeb 3, 2003 11:216316
Clarity at last [60 words]Rivka MuskatFeb 3, 2003 11:006314
Victory [6 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 3, 2003 09:556313
Plans are not the answer! [46 words]Robert AbramsFeb 3, 2003 09:056312
Truths are recognizable... [49 words]Kerry AndersonFeb 3, 2003 05:416309
Ignoring complicity. [279 words]Timothy P. BrownFeb 3, 2003 01:516307
Dr. Pipes clearly defined the "problem" and the solution is obvious! [91 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 3, 2003 01:496306
Pipes = Genius [89 words]steve frederickFeb 3, 2003 00:146305
Western assumptions may be false. [644 words]A.F.Feb 3, 2003 00:096304
discussion on chatboard [84 words]Joe KeysorFeb 2, 2003 23:196302
What's wrong with Jordan? [585 words]ShaharFeb 2, 2003 22:576300
"Speak soft but carry a big stick"(T. Roosevelt) [293 words]alexFeb 2, 2003 22:466299
Defining Motivation [219 words]E. J. BlumbergFeb 2, 2003 22:256297
a question about Oslo [309 words]Susan KriegerFeb 2, 2003 22:186295
Other Arab Nations?? [66 words]A. J.Feb 2, 2003 22:176294
Underlying problem in Palestine [82 words]Wallace L. CooperFeb 2, 2003 21:346292
What comes first? [221 words]Boris FrenkelFeb 2, 2003 20:586291
peace in the middle east [45 words]robert mandreshFeb 2, 2003 20:106289
Should Israel be invited to join NATO? [739 words]Sam LewisFeb 2, 2003 16:536284
Does Israel Need a Plan [39 words]Yale RichmoindFeb 2, 2003 16:436283
For how long can TRUTH be ignored? [88 words]Salomon BenzimraFeb 2, 2003 16:216281
Brilliant! [75 words]Mort ReichekFeb 2, 2003 15:206280
The Iron Fist is Not the Answer [471 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 2, 2003 14:076278
Religious fanaticism [185 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 2, 2003 13:386277
excellent analysis [199 words]Alfred DukeszFeb 2, 2003 13:376276
Excellent analysis [131 words]martin kesslerFeb 2, 2003 13:186274
Query [57 words]David FawcettFeb 2, 2003 13:056272
Kahanne was too late and too early [44 words]Norman WandFeb 2, 2003 12:486271
well-conceived analysis [108 words]Michelle TuchmanFeb 2, 2003 12:026268
Israel's "plan" [150 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David SchechterFeb 2, 2003 11:436266
The only solution for peace in Israel [134 words]Jordan HoltzFeb 2, 2003 11:216264
The Unobviousness and Uncommoness of Obvious Common Sense [108 words]S. Matthew PrasteinFeb 2, 2003 11:216263
A Clear Vision [40 words]Thea (Tzippi) RiiseFeb 2, 2003 11:126262
Thanks for posting it! [31 words]CookitFeb 2, 2003 11:096260
Tough problems require tough solutions! [109 words]Kevin HandleyFeb 2, 2003 10:496259

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to What's wrong with Jordan? by Shahar

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)