1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Should Israel be invited to join NATO?

Reader comment on item: Does Israel Need a [Peace] Plan?

Submitted by Sam Lewis (United States), Feb 2, 2003 at 16:53

I found Mr. Pipes article extremely interesting. His suggested approach is one that addresses the failures and weaknesses of ALL the plans and hopes for peace in the Middle East. He points to the "change of heart" that must take place among the Palestinians - that the victory thus gained by Israel would bring even more benefits to the Pali people than even to the Israeli people. But, Mr. Pipes, how do we arrive at the "change of heart"? Certainly, recognition by the United States of Jerusalem as the Capitol of Israel is one step. But, I think it has to be accomplished by another, even bigger step. Probably, preceeded by this bigger step.

A couple of months ago, I read the speech given by James Woolsey to the National War College (16 November 2002). I assume you are aware of it - if not, I would be pleased to forward same to you. (That sounds presumptuous, and I do not want to
be thought so. I am sure you have ready access to the speech.)

In his speech, Mr. Woolsey states that he, like Eliot Cohen, believes that we are presently engaged in World War IV. That this war is being directed at the entire Western World. Our enemies are "the Islamist Shia, the ruling circles, the ruling Clerics, the Mullahs of Iran.......who sponsor and back Hezbollah".

"A second group is the fascists....the Baathist parties of Iraq and really Syria as well....they're totalitarian, they're anti-Semetic, they,re fascist......

The third group, ....is the Islamist Sunni. And this is the most. ....virulent.....".

He went on to say a lot of things, but what I most remember was "These people don't hate us for what we've done wrong. They hate us for what we do right.....we're hated because of freedom of speech, because of freedom of religion, because of our economic freedom, because of our equal...treatment of women, because of all the good things we do"

He continues, saying that "we have given some evidence of being what bin Laden has actually called a paper tiger". He gave some examples via conversations with a Japanese officer after World War II. He said we were regarded as "a rich,spoiled, feckless country" - that what we did after December 7, 1941 stunned them.

Woolsey says he thinks we gave a lot of evidence to Saddam and to the islamist Shia in Teheran and Hezbollah and to the Islamist Sunni that we wouldn't fight. In Iran in 1979, in Beirut in 1983, in various terrorist acts throughout the 1980s we liigated but did not fight.l In 1991, we fought for Kuwait, and left without finishing the job. We encouraged the Kurds to rebel and left them to be massacered. In 1993, Saddam tried to assassinate former President Bush, and we did practically nothing. In 1993, our helicopters were shot down in Mogadishu and we left. We did nothing about the Cole bombing. And ,so, on September 11th, bin Laden blew up our buildings in New York and finally, we reacted. We surprised our enemies by what we did in Afghanistan and probably scared them.

However, the terrorism goes on. It goes on, mainly, against Israel - but, we fear it will come here. Our infrastructure is open and accessible. We know the terrorists of Israel are connected to the terrorists who would attack us and the rest of the world.
We KNOW who sponsors them and enables them. Saddam has to be taken down and the other sponsors and enablers have to be put on notice. WE ARE NOT TO BE TAKEN FOR GRANTED. We are the most powerful nation the world has ever seen. Fortunately, for that world, we only want good. But we must show our enemies and wouldbe enemies that we mean business. TERRORISM ANYWHERE is NOT to be tolerated.

Our first step is Iraq. Our next step is to tell our enemies that our friends are off limits to their terror. INVITE ISRAEL TO JOIN NATO! He who would attack our allies, attacks us. And, we will fight to protect them.

Then, we can recognize Jerusalem. Then, can we FORCE the change of heart among the Pali. Then, we can FORCE both Israel and the new proposed State of Palestine to each accept safe and secure borders. Then, we will have accomplished what all the other plans and hopes have not been able to do.

And, if it cannot be NATO for whatever reason, then something like it.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (67) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
"the right road to peace" [383 words]shukiJul 5, 2007 18:53103051
I agree with the ONLY DEFINITION of "GENOCIDE BOMBERS" [212 words]ADec 18, 2005 10:2330138
Two Nations, Two Walls [705 words]Karel SykoraJun 4, 2005 11:5722556
A Plan [171 words]Murray SmithMar 6, 2004 13:2614104
Close, but no cigar [449 words]Ray ExleyFeb 3, 2004 05:5013674
Stated as it is [78 words]RenirobertsFeb 2, 2004 20:1513671
whos side is England on? [80 words]Benjamin Curd {14 year old}Jan 21, 2004 16:5013474
God bless Daniel Pipes [24 words]Albert PintoDec 29, 2003 16:2212987
My Take on the Israeli/Palestinian dilemma [1569 words]Hector FernandezNov 7, 2003 10:0712102
Thank God for Daniel Pipes. [5 words]Christina FoltzJun 5, 2003 20:529406
Transfer is still the only way [217 words]RayMay 30, 2003 03:479293
Aren't we forgetting Islam [377 words]Y Brandstetter MDApr 24, 2003 08:218650
What the left demands [209 words]JonathanMar 4, 2003 17:167070
Thank You [271 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Paula KirbyMar 4, 2003 11:157051
difficult problem [175 words]joyceFeb 19, 2003 10:066771
One question [153 words]CharlesFeb 12, 2003 07:166582
Your advocacy of "total victory" is misguided. [202 words]Luke TakeuchiFeb 8, 2003 04:596493
Why not another idea? [240 words]V. ThogersenFeb 4, 2003 17:356394
Strategic Thinking for Israel (by an Israeli) [1614 words]Yirmeyahu Ben-David, Paqid 16Feb 4, 2003 11:346370
Does Israel Need a Plan [61 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Val WidgrenFeb 4, 2003 10:516368
The Arabs' mentality in a nut shell [190 words]Jonathan LipshutzFeb 4, 2003 06:516347
Does Israel has a plan? [56 words]Muhammad SiddiquiFeb 4, 2003 00:546343
"Genocide Bombers" [213 words]Jacob WolfowiczFeb 3, 2003 22:216339
Winning the Peace [101 words]Ken GoldsteinFeb 3, 2003 15:346332
The Palestinian State of Terror [555 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 3, 2003 14:466331
Anti- Zionism in Western Euope [57 words]M. NadlerFeb 3, 2003 14:036329
The Impossible Dream [103 words]J. SpiroFeb 3, 2003 13:396328
Train of thought ran off the Track [273 words]Isaiah520Feb 3, 2003 13:396327
plan !!! [60 words]plainolcitizenFeb 3, 2003 12:286320
no cloudy, smokey apparitions here [24 words]Bruce A. BirnbergFeb 3, 2003 12:166319
The Best Review, Yet [371 words]Don SkupskyFeb 3, 2003 12:046318
Response to "Does Israel Need a Plan" [427 words]robert goldsteinFeb 3, 2003 11:256317
Who in the U.S. govt will move on this? [113 words]Mel KusinFeb 3, 2003 11:216316
Clarity at last [60 words]Rivka MuskatFeb 3, 2003 11:006314
Victory [6 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 3, 2003 09:556313
Plans are not the answer! [46 words]Robert AbramsFeb 3, 2003 09:056312
Truths are recognizable... [49 words]Kerry AndersonFeb 3, 2003 05:416309
Ignoring complicity. [279 words]Timothy P. BrownFeb 3, 2003 01:516307
Dr. Pipes clearly defined the "problem" and the solution is obvious! [91 words]Ivan BarnaFeb 3, 2003 01:496306
Pipes = Genius [89 words]steve frederickFeb 3, 2003 00:146305
Western assumptions may be false. [644 words]A.F.Feb 3, 2003 00:096304
discussion on chatboard [84 words]Joe KeysorFeb 2, 2003 23:196302
What's wrong with Jordan? [585 words]ShaharFeb 2, 2003 22:576300
"Speak soft but carry a big stick"(T. Roosevelt) [293 words]alexFeb 2, 2003 22:466299
Defining Motivation [219 words]E. J. BlumbergFeb 2, 2003 22:256297
a question about Oslo [309 words]Susan KriegerFeb 2, 2003 22:186295
Other Arab Nations?? [66 words]A. J.Feb 2, 2003 22:176294
Underlying problem in Palestine [82 words]Wallace L. CooperFeb 2, 2003 21:346292
What comes first? [221 words]Boris FrenkelFeb 2, 2003 20:586291
peace in the middle east [45 words]robert mandreshFeb 2, 2003 20:106289
Should Israel be invited to join NATO? [739 words]Sam LewisFeb 2, 2003 16:536284
Does Israel Need a Plan [39 words]Yale RichmoindFeb 2, 2003 16:436283
For how long can TRUTH be ignored? [88 words]Salomon BenzimraFeb 2, 2003 16:216281
Brilliant! [75 words]Mort ReichekFeb 2, 2003 15:206280
The Iron Fist is Not the Answer [471 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 2, 2003 14:076278
Religious fanaticism [185 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 2, 2003 13:386277
excellent analysis [199 words]Alfred DukeszFeb 2, 2003 13:376276
Excellent analysis [131 words]martin kesslerFeb 2, 2003 13:186274
Query [57 words]David FawcettFeb 2, 2003 13:056272
Kahanne was too late and too early [44 words]Norman WandFeb 2, 2003 12:486271
well-conceived analysis [108 words]Michelle TuchmanFeb 2, 2003 12:026268
Israel's "plan" [150 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
David SchechterFeb 2, 2003 11:436266
The only solution for peace in Israel [134 words]Jordan HoltzFeb 2, 2003 11:216264
The Unobviousness and Uncommoness of Obvious Common Sense [108 words]S. Matthew PrasteinFeb 2, 2003 11:216263
A Clear Vision [40 words]Thea (Tzippi) RiiseFeb 2, 2003 11:126262
Thanks for posting it! [31 words]CookitFeb 2, 2003 11:096260
Tough problems require tough solutions! [109 words]Kevin HandleyFeb 2, 2003 10:496259

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Should Israel be invited to join NATO? by Sam Lewis

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)