Words of an erudite man
Reader comment on item: Interview: ‘I watch with frustration as the Israelis don't get the point'
in response to reader comment: Dr Pipes deserve an other prize

Submitted by Infidel (Canada), Aug 4, 2006 at 14:57

Harrak, while most of your comments are difficult to understand, because of your unique, oxymoronic and inaccurate use of the English language, false assumptions and taqiyya, they are rather entertaining. However, some of your comments are just plain ridiculous. Your most ridiculous statement is, "I do not agree with Dr Pipes short-term non-pragmatic realism". The meaning of "pragmatic" is dealing with facts or actual occurrences; practical; active rather than contemplative; pertaining to the study of events and historical phenomena with emphasis on their practical outcome. Essentially you're saying that you don't agree with Dr. Pipes' short term or brief lies, or falsehoods that are real. Where in any of Dr. Pipes' comments did you find, "short-term non-pragmatic realism"? What were you trying to say? Or are these words only intended to give you the appearance of an erudite man?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.