69 million page views

White House pressure: battered wife syndrome?

Reader comment on item: Interview: ‘I watch with frustration as the Israelis don't get the point'

Submitted by Steve Klein (United States), Jun 12, 2006 at 14:42

I think the following critical point in this interview is worth exploring from an historical perspective:

The Jerusalem Post: "How would the White House have responded after President Bush's June 24, 2002 speech, had Sharon gone to Washington and, instead of proposing disengagement, requested that the PA be treated as an enemy that had to be defeated militarily as part of the war on terror?

Dr. Pipes (in part): "Israeli leaders did not make the case ----- that as the US government is engaged in an asymmetric war, where the vastness of the US is arrayed against al-Qaida, so, too, in a lesser disproportion, Israel is arrayed against the PLO, Hamas, Islamic Jihad ---- because it is not their view. Instead, Sharon agreed with Bush in principle....."

Yet Prime Minister Sharon did make this case --- in the days and weeks following September 11, 2001 --- that Israel was engaged in the same struggle against the same radical ideology, the same enemy as America. Sharon's initial reaction to the President's call for a Palestinian state only days after the September 11, 2001 atrocities was anything but conciliatory or agreeable:

Sharon: "I call on the Western democracies and primarily the leader of the free world, the United States: Do not repeat the dreadful mistake of 1938 when enlightened European democracies decided to sacrifice Czechoslovakia for a convenient temporary solution. Do not try to appease the Arabs on our expense. This is unacceptable to us. Israel will not be Czechoslovakia. Israel will fight terrorism." (emphasis mine)

Zalmon Shoval, Sharon Foreign Policy Advisor, noted that "it was a word of warning to everyone, including to ourselves, that appeasement, whether it was Nazi Germany in 1938 or Palestinian terrorists at this time, is really counterproductive and could bring further violence in the future."

CNN's JOHN KING: "What angered Washington most was Sharon's comparison to Europe ceding parts of Czechoslovakia to Hitler, suggesting that in its aggressive effort to court Arab nations for the coalition against terrorism, the United States was turning its back on Israel's security."

ARI FLEISCHER, WHITE HOUSE SPOKESMAN: The president believes that these remarks are unacceptable. Israel can have no better or stronger friend than the United States, and better friend than President Bush.

KING: Secretary of State Colin called Sharon once to voice the president's displeasure, then again later, after the prime minister agreed to issue a conciliatory statement.

In a statement issued only a day later, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon noted the, quote, "deep friendship and special relationship" between the two nations and saluted President Bush for a, quote, "bold and courageous decision to fight terrorism."

What happened to Ariel Sharon? Initially he did not agree with Mr. Bush in principle. "Israel will fight terrorism." Yet he feared offending President Bush as does Mr. Olmert.

Why? Why are Israel's leaders afraid to offend their American ally? We know the president is wrong to exert immoral pressure on Israel only to appease the Muslim-Arab world, united in their hatred of Israel. This lack of confidence, low self-esteem, whatever, on the part of Israel's leadership along with the comforting words of affection from this president are reminiscent of the battered wife syndrome. It appears to be an unhealthy dependency when the leadership of a nation betrays its fundamental trust to protect its citizens.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (53) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
HaShem bless you, Dr. Pipes [69 words]Iris FinklerAug 8, 2006 01:5151917
Israel's Victory [121 words]Pastor Daniel StelmackerJun 26, 2006 17:5648201
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR ALL [897 words]Blazer HartmanAug 17, 2009 07:1248201
Other considerations ignored or unaware by comment authors [516 words]yzoleowlJun 16, 2006 17:4847795
Frustration and then some... [158 words]SHmuel HaLeviJun 15, 2006 06:1547703
Congrats Sir [89 words]YovenJun 14, 2006 14:2847677
Dr Pipes deserves a 2nd prize..continued. [60 words]HarrakJun 14, 2006 10:1947658
Dr Pipes deserve an other prize [61 words]HarrakJun 14, 2006 10:1447654
Words of an erudite man [139 words]InfidelAug 4, 2006 14:5747654
You think YOU'RE frustrated? [381 words]Dave FishbeinJun 14, 2006 02:1147626
Do I know you? [35 words]Amy BeckmanAug 10, 2006 08:5647626
Yes it's me... [16 words]David FishbeinAug 13, 2006 01:4747626
Amy, Please contact [8 words]David FishbeinAug 27, 2006 02:5047626
Imperical Historical Understanding... [147 words]Lee StanfordJun 13, 2006 15:5747595
Great insights [10 words]nathanJun 13, 2006 07:4847571
Optimistic About Pessimism [225 words]Susan H. SomervilleJun 13, 2006 04:5947555
Cold War Containment [159 words]elaineJun 12, 2006 19:5747531
Self-induced pernicious amnesia [2406 words]YyzoleowlJun 12, 2006 15:5847520
White House pressure: battered wife syndrome? [553 words]Steve KleinJun 12, 2006 14:4247515
The basic problem?? [184 words]Carl GoldbergJun 11, 2006 20:2147481
The basic point [73 words]kadar haybeJul 24, 2011 01:2947481
Lambasting Israel [159 words]Nenette GrunbergJun 11, 2006 19:4947479
Wishful thinking [8 words]Leonid Gaft, MontrealJun 12, 2006 15:4947479
Israelis don't get the point [225 words]Nenette GrunbergJun 13, 2006 16:4047479
points are well taken [152 words]syeven LJun 11, 2006 19:2747476
the negative tendencies of world media [111 words]Anubhav SinghJun 13, 2006 02:3847476
Mr. Pipes Sends An Important Message [57 words]AnneMJun 11, 2006 18:2947473
1Loud and Clear! [35 words]Al RothJun 11, 2006 17:4247470
World Should Heed Pipe's Words of Wisdom [96 words]Mike RamirezJun 11, 2006 16:3747464
Israelis have never aimed at victory. [392 words]Allen WeingartenJun 11, 2006 16:3447463
1suggestions from Daniel Papes what Israel can do. [64 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Melvin LavinJun 11, 2006 16:2647462
This is a very realistic and important interview [126 words]Dr Yoram ShifftanJun 11, 2006 14:3947460
1How to impose victory? [149 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Mentat_99Jun 11, 2006 14:2747459
1Israel as a winner. [49 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
James O'HaraJun 11, 2006 14:1347458
Israel and the Arabs [124 words]Donald W. BalesJun 11, 2006 13:4247457
hypothesis as to if and when a shift to, "victory-driven warfare" from, "conflict management", will be made [152 words]ira berkowitzJun 11, 2006 12:1447453
Congratulations Dr. Pipes for a well-deserved and long overdue award [136 words]Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.Jun 11, 2006 11:3847450
Excellent job! [46 words]concernedJun 11, 2006 11:3347449
Who now has the right to this land? [27 words]alex laughlinJun 11, 2006 11:2847447
Turkey and EU [41 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Topi HeiskanenJun 11, 2006 11:0647444
imposing victory [347 words]joeJun 11, 2006 10:2447442
JPost Interview with Daniel Pipes [247 words]Maurice PicowJun 11, 2006 09:0747437
What is "winning"? [63 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Stephen RichmanJun 11, 2006 08:3947434
voice of sanity [31 words]brona RosenJun 11, 2006 08:3747433
What is Winning [95 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDJun 11, 2006 08:3547432
Getting The Point [80 words]PhillipJun 11, 2006 08:0747430
Israeli withdrawal as "conflict management" [74 words]J. SheffJun 11, 2006 07:2047428
Some people do not want to see peace in Israel and Palestine! [146 words]Muhammad_Jesus_Moses_AdamJun 11, 2006 07:1247427
Our shortcomings catching up to us [131 words]David W. LincolnJun 11, 2006 06:5847426
Another "4 Bean" article! [47 words]Herb StoneJun 11, 2006 06:3947422
An excellent interview, but... [286 words]Kenneth S. BesigJun 11, 2006 06:3847421
One Track Mind [104 words]BlackspeareJun 11, 2006 20:4147421
If Israelis believe they have been defeated... [58 words]Kenneth S. BesigJun 13, 2006 09:2247421

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)