Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

We all can Contribute
Reader comment on item: CAIR Backs Down from Anti-CAIR

Submitted by Funk Soul Bruhva (Thailand), Apr 22, 2006 at 00:27

Bravo Dr. Pipes.

Not only must we deligitimize CAIR and spread the word about their terrorist ties and sympathies, we must also deligitimize Islam itself.

Perhpas we all can contribute by popularizing the viewpoints of Dr. Pipes, Ibn Warraq, Walid Shoebat, Robert Spencer, Wafa Sultan, Ali Sina, and others.... in various ways, primarily through helping them to get their books onto the best seller lists.

Islam must be deligitimized as a religion so it no longer can enjoy the rights and priviledges that legitimate religion receives. However, in order to deligitimize Islam the war with PCLUI (PC Leftist Useful Idiots) must be won first.

We non-muslims must be very active and vocal in our demands for the media to propogate the truth about Islam; to stop sugar coating it with euphamisms and moral equivalence; using loaded terms to demonize those who appose Islam, etc.

In other words, we must write, call, email our local media experssing that we don't want to hear any more reports about "disaffected youths" when the truth is the "youths" in question are marauding MUSLIMS. We dont want to see reports of Christian-Muslim violence in Africa or Indonesia, when it's the Muslims who are attacking the Christians, destroying Churches and beheading innocent young schoolgirls.

Maybe we also need to start an organization called Media Watch !!!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (57) on this item

Title By Date
Islam vs. the Islamists [274 words]ShockedAug 31, 2007 10:31
Rebound [48 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 19, 2009 11:14
the good guys win [49 words]Phil GreendJun 3, 2007 22:56
Defeating Islamists [385 words]John BastileApr 23, 2006 22:53
Non-Muslims Students Association [54 words]Ed SMar 23, 2007 07:17
On banning the Koran [222 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 19, 2009 19:10
banning the Koran [175 words]Bill WhitfieldOct 17, 2009 05:37
Well done [40 words]Susan IrelandApr 23, 2006 09:32
Blackbook of islam [257 words]G.BisvasApr 23, 2006 07:02
IW, step in the right direction [109 words]B. AlotaibiApr 22, 2006 14:50
CAIR: A Cancer of Our Time [85 words]Behrouz AzarniaApr 22, 2006 14:10
Unlegislaturized Sharia laws in the West [148 words]Ex-MuslimApr 22, 2006 10:43
Ex Muslim [3 words]RashidApr 23, 2006 14:58
Hypocrisy of the Muslims. [69 words]MyOwnDrummerApr 23, 2006 22:54
He said, "My hypocrisy only goes so far" [62 words]D WilliamsMay 9, 2006 12:55
CAIR Backs Down from Anti-CAIR [83 words]steven LMay 20, 2006 22:41
CAIR Backs Down from Anti-CAIR [13 words]steven LMay 21, 2006 23:16
Dismissal of CAIR's suit against Andrew Whitehead [283 words]Maurice PicowApr 22, 2006 06:22
ACAIR victory should mean FBI investigation, right? [34 words]Dave MillerApr 22, 2006 03:22
CAIR [384 words]D WilliamsApr 22, 2006 02:57
⇒ We all can Contribute [217 words]Funk Soul BruhvaApr 22, 2006 00:27
mediawatch [46 words]fernApr 22, 2006 08:53
A Message From England [109 words]jenOct 23, 2006 12:44
G*d Bless You Sir [37 words]ElmoApr 21, 2006 21:26
bless you! [36 words]Donald OApr 21, 2006 18:18
victory for whitehead [32 words]robert finkApr 21, 2006 18:12
lawsuit against cair [59 words]alan mitchellApr 21, 2006 16:19
Liberal Media and Homeland Security - Pay Attention [56 words]JaladhiApr 21, 2006 16:02
Lost a golden opportunity to destroy CAIR [76 words]Romesh ChanderApr 21, 2006 14:54
Lost a golden opportunity to destroy CAIR - WRONG! [49 words]TreyApr 22, 2006 15:45
The poison in the soup [93 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 23, 2009 21:10
Oh- to never have to see CAIR used as a tv news "contributor" [64 words]GreggApr 21, 2006 14:53
Finally, CAIR Takes One in the Shorts! [140 words]Jan David RomanoffApr 21, 2006 14:32
Too Bad It Isn't On All The Front Pages [111 words]orange yonasonApr 21, 2006 16:28
Congratulations [20 words]V.SterninApr 21, 2006 14:12
Yes! Disenfranchise CAIR for the enemy of the United States It Is! [54 words]Persia Gran-FreelandApr 21, 2006 13:48
Thank You Deserved [24 words]jerry w. levinApr 21, 2006 13:19
CAIR's financial information [134 words]Nick WiesenfeldApr 21, 2006 13:14
ISLAM IN AMERICA [70 words]Sam MoharebApr 21, 2006 12:48
Leave First Amendment alone [88 words]JasonApr 24, 2006 14:47
A Frightening Vision [271 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 21, 2009 11:06
gee, all those job offers [!] [203 words]SENTINELApr 21, 2006 12:45
Re. #665, Why establish Islamic Watch
[w/response] [164 words]
Bryan TaplitsApr 21, 2006 12:42
WHY CAN'T DISCOVERY BE RE-OPENED IN OTHER WAYS? [92 words]Mike NargizianApr 21, 2006 11:08
Islamist Watch, a great idea [45 words]Carmen Waggoner, Ph.D.Apr 21, 2006 11:02
Dr. Pipes is the gift that keeps giving! [43 words]macbrooApr 21, 2006 10:51
Well done [138 words]john w. mcginleyApr 21, 2006 10:32
CAIR's Loss Is Freedom's Gain [110 words]Mike RamirezApr 21, 2006 10:30
Good development [129 words]true believerApr 21, 2006 10:23
Anti-CAIR should not have settled this lawsuit [96 words]Romesh ChanderApr 21, 2006 10:07
Good Work! [79 words]Ina HollandApr 21, 2006 10:03
Too Bad [80 words]rickApr 21, 2006 09:58
Cair - Anti Cair Lawsuit [19 words]Lance S. SilverApr 21, 2006 09:28
If Anti-CAIR's charges are true [88 words]There is NO Santa ClausApr 21, 2006 08:59
Fifth Column Elements [88 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 22, 2009 11:10
Victory, but the war wages on [73 words]David W. LincolnApr 21, 2006 08:56
THE 5TH COLUMN IN OUR MIDST! [23 words]Herb StoneApr 21, 2006 08:36

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page