Re. #665, Why establish Islamic Watch
Reader comment on item: CAIR Backs Down from Anti-CAIR

Submitted by Bryan Taplits (United States), Apr 21, 2006 at 12:42

Dr. Pipes:

If you recall my E-mails to you, I believe you are very percipient analyst. I believe I should say this so that you know that my question is asked sincerely. My question is:

Why, if an Islamic organization, isn't a front for terrorist activities, do you believe it necessary to "watch" it. I'm not saying that this isn't a good idea (particularly since-at least it is my belief-many fundamental Islamic organizations might very well mutate into a terroristic fundamental Islamic organization; and the harm they will inflict [ala 9/11] is great even though the probability they'll inflict it is minimal), but I wish you would give your reason or reasons.

And does that make any religious organization open to a "watch"? (As I suggested, I'll most likely will agree with your reason(s), because most of your past columns have been insightful and prophetic. So you must have a good reason(s) for establishing "Islam Watch"-I just would like to know what it/they is/are).

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Daniel Pipes replies:

Radical Islam can advance lawfully, and that to me is as great a threat as its use of violence.