4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

The source of the plot of the 2011 Muhammad's video? The Sira is the source! And Islamists, the Regressive Left and evil Politicians

Reader comment on item: Department of Corrections (of Others' Factual Mistakes about Me)
in response to reader comment: Eventually, the sun always shines through

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 3, 2017 at 12:39

Hi Michael

The infamous Muhammad's video is indeed a case in point: The plot is from Ibn Hisham's redaction of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah (Muhammad's biography) word for word and the plot is as follows:

1. Muhammad tells Khadija his wealthy wife that there is a man sitting (this man is Gabriel) so she tells him "Sit on my right thigh, do you still see him?"

2. Muhammad's replied that he still can see him Then Khadija tells him to sit on her left thigh and asked Muhammad "do you still see him?"

3. Muhammad replied that he still can see him Then Khadija tells him to sit on her lap and asked Muhammad "do you still see him?"

4. Muhammad replied "yes" Then Khadija takes of her Khimar (Islamic dress) to get ready for sex And surprise surprise Muhammad cannot see him

5. Why did Gabriel disappear? Because in Islam an angel is not supposed to be a peeping Tom

6. The conclusion? Khadija tells him that it must be an angel and the rest is history!

And here is a link from no other than Islamweb so no one would say that we kuffar make things up

http://library.islamweb.net/newlibrary/display_book.php?idfrom=268&idto=268&bk_no=58&ID=199

Readers can also copy and paste امتحان خديجة برهان الوحي or The Examination of Khadija and Proving the Revelation and then you can use a translation tool and read it It is all there in black and white

So the man that directed and produced the Muhammad's video was quoting an Islamic text He did not make anything up

The end result? The Regressive Left accused him of Islamophobia, Ignorant Muslims that have no clue what disasters they have in their books rioted and the an infamous politician blamed him for the Benghazi atrocity and made it clear that she would want him incarcerated for insulting Islam

Et voila another case of the toxic brew of Islamists and the Regressive Left and ignorant politicians

But the truth is: This funny and bizarre tradition is from one of the most revered Muslim books and that is Ibn Ishaq's Sira

The moral of the story is if it is a lie (as in telling us that the word Jihad means inner struggle instead of telling us it means holy war) then we should expose the liar and provide evidence from Muslim literary sources not in translations but in the original Arabic


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (45) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2The toxic brew of Islamists and the Regressive Left [338 words]dhimmi no moreAug 26, 2017 09:44240600
Eventually, the sun always shines through [299 words]Michael SSep 27, 2017 17:46240600
2The source of the plot of the 2011 Muhammad's video? The Sira is the source! And Islamists, the Regressive Left and evil Politicians [400 words]dhimmi no moreOct 3, 2017 12:39240600
1You have gotten off lightly, Daniel [200 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael SAug 14, 2017 15:30240473
Shoddy journalism or deliberate misinformation? [103 words]JeffApr 9, 2017 10:37238352
Truth Tellers and Liars: The New Diversity? [37 words]DaveDec 3, 2016 17:41234480
Good clarifications [80 words]AnonJun 18, 2013 23:58207086
1Soft intellectualism [130 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Alan MeyerMay 24, 2013 23:39206312
1Tough test for soft intellectualism [158 words]PrashantDec 5, 2016 02:58206312
I'm sorry Dr Pipes [168 words]Will EmbersMay 21, 2013 14:53206213
2The liberal age revisited [118 words]dhimmi no moreMay 24, 2013 09:11206213
I disagree, Dhimmi [153 words]Will EmbersMay 26, 2013 20:30206213
3Islam and history [587 words]dhimmi no moreMay 27, 2013 09:08206213
6التكرار يعلم الحمار and Muslims in the west [118 words]dhimmi no moreMay 20, 2013 06:41206187
Puzzled When Jews Attack Peters [55 words]DaveDec 18, 2011 10:15191817
1Islamists like to "play" victim [98 words]PrashantDec 20, 2011 07:10191817
You, Dr. Pipes speak the truth, ! [25 words]Phil GreendAug 8, 2010 08:13176486
Certain Islamic positions may indeed be anti-democratic and anti-patriotic [435 words]TedAug 7, 2010 15:06176461
Ebrahim "eboo" Patel being invited by B Hussein Obama [466 words]SvetlanatchkahFeb 12, 2009 00:40150289
Excellent Reference about Ebrahim Eboo Patel [44 words]YnnatchkahAug 1, 2008 14:13136064
1Eboo Patel [39 words]sam patelAug 16, 2008 13:13136064
Deeply appreciate your kindness [149 words]YnnatchkahAug 16, 2008 19:07136064
typical [122 words]VijayAug 11, 2010 06:54136064
Ad absurdo [141 words]Rebecca MouldsJul 20, 2008 01:34135417
My view on ABC News [124 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiJul 19, 2008 23:26135410
Feeling very offended [93 words]NancyNov 21, 2008 12:42135410
Islam and Democracy [299 words]moDec 13, 2007 17:17116129
Iran doesn't elect there rules, they elect there PR representative [104 words]AndyDec 30, 2009 01:13116129
2Re: Want to deny American Muslims the vote? [99 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
USNov 26, 2007 12:38114945
Denying females, muslims and jews the right to vote [176 words]James BurkeNov 3, 2007 09:00112997
People make "Carnaval" to find ways... [209 words]YnnatchkahJul 8, 2007 04:01103224
islamofascism [10 words]jon purizhanskyJan 14, 2007 15:2572866
Doctor Pipes and the Jyllands- Posten [154 words]Octavio JohansonNov 21, 2006 16:0966864
Rhetoric and the term "Islamists" [578 words]Tim CleavelandAug 30, 2006 13:1654391
Christian Genocide? [66 words]August WilliamsJul 20, 2008 18:4754391
Mearsheimer and Walt [104 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
B.A. KirkenMar 20, 2006 15:1440817
Amazing! [834 words]Mrs4Jun 22, 2006 13:4740817
1From Campus to Caliphate - University to Ummah [71 words]Ben van de PolderMar 12, 2006 01:4939802
Doesn't History Say No? [107 words]Solomon2Mar 1, 2006 13:3438516
Facts versus opinion [69 words]Norman WandFeb 21, 2006 18:5336876
everyone can tell their own opinion [29 words]calizo joyJan 16, 2007 02:2736876
DENIAL OF INVOLVEMENT [112 words]donvanFeb 20, 2006 15:5736581
Nor is this a clash of civilizations [121 words]Alain RobertFeb 17, 2006 23:0236160
Jyllands-Posten [48 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Peter KofodFeb 9, 2006 04:2234567
Just saw that [13 words]UKFeb 6, 2006 19:5533987

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The source of the plot of the 2011 Muhammad's video? The Sira is the source! And Islamists, the Regressive Left and evil Politicians by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes