69 million page views

Our dear Awliya and the word for today: clueless part quatre

Reader comment on item: Maj. Nidal Hasan's Islamist Life
in response to reader comment: Not changing the point klew

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Nov 29, 2009 at 09:50

Our dear awliya the follower of deen al-irhab wa rab al-irhab and rasul al-irhab oh do not forget to ask the freak al-Hilali to tell you what this transliterated Arabic means

>You're kidding aren't you? Didn't you notice I did say " point proven in taht there may be non violence in the Buddhist teachings BUT human nature follows it's own course" ..

So you agree that we will not find the likes of ayat al-sayf or the violent Q9:111 in Buddhist teachings right?

In saying that ANY religion can be used as justification for violence up to and including murder

Bogus. I cannot think of any of any doctrine in Buddhism that would demand the followers of the Buddha to kill the polytheitsts or to fight ahl al-kitab or to kill and get killed or to terrorize the enemies of Allah and you know what? Jihadis believe this nonsense and case in point: your Hindu ancestors were brutalized by Muslims due to the infamous aya al-sayf

> was in response to someone born into the western Abrahamic faith (I'm assuming of course Grand Infidel being of christian/jewish birth) meaning any of the 3 biggest monotheistic religions

Oh the sky god and the violence inflicted on humanity including your Hindu ancestors in the name of such so called God but wait and I'm here will be quoting only Muslim sources:

1. Your Allah says in the infamous and violent ayat al-sayf: kill the polytheists but as usual your Allah does not define who are really those polytheists (oh you did learn by now that al-tafseer wa al-ta'weel are all guessing)

2. In Q9:36 your Allah says fight the polytheists! So which one is it? kill or fight? and the usual poor theology of the Qur'an where we have the A but not the A and only allahu a3lam

3. The rasm of the word iqtolo or kill in Q9:5 or the infamous ayat al-sayf can also be read as qatilo or fight and so much for the unedited Qur'an

4. Q9:30 your Allah says that the Christians are really polytheists as they regard al-maseeh as ibn Allah and the Jews must be also polytheists as they regard 3Uzair as ibn Allah

5. Therefore the Qur'an is really saying that Jews and Christians are not monotheists (sic) and they must the subject of ayat al-sayf

6. And here is your bonus for today: The Jews never claimed that their ethnic god is the only god or the god of anyone else and do you know why? because they knew very well from their knowledge of Greek logic that the idea of the single God is absurd but Muahmmad with his poor logic fell for it

7. So we established so far that the Qur'an tells us that the Jews and the Christians are polytheists

8. Now if we turn to Q33:56 your Allah says that inna allaha wa mala'ikatuh yusalluna 3ala al-nabi

Your Allah is saying that he and his angels PRAY to Muhammad! What a fadiha! Do you know what this means? It means that Muhammad is also a god beside Allah!

Then congratulations our dear dear awliya the clueless but Islam is not a monotheistic religion either

>AND NOT suggesting the eastern religions in that conversation dimwit!

You must pardon me our dear awliya but the dimwit and the clueless is you

>:D

What is that :D?

>YES my point to you

You have a point? really?

> is that ANY member of ANY religion can perpetrate violence

Hello: but in islam those that kill and fight can blame Allah for doing so right ?not in Buddhism

>(no pretending here klew) And that list shows murder/ genocides committed on a massive scale by people who call themselves Buddhist !

Hello" The Khumer rouge were not Buddhist they were communists which is another violent religion mr demagogue

>YOU brought up the Buddhists and I responded.. Never mind what I've OMITTED klew, lets not concentrate on SEMANTICS ( even though that seems to be all you've got )

gobbledygook

>No better example of verbal diarrhea

Do you really know what is verbal diarrhea? I do not think so

>than your suggestion of "me crawling back into a cave" ..

May be you should and have some revelation just like your so called prophet

>It may be better for you to take your little head out of the sand and notice the ever increasing numbers of Muslims in Australia and abroad

Why do you live in Australia? Why not Saudi Arabia? Oh let me guess because your masters the Arabs will never regard you as an Arab or even equal to them right?

So much for the brotherhood of islam

> ! Sorry to say YOU HAVE to deal with it ;))

I urge you to abandon islam and be free again

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Our dear Awliya and the word for today: clueless part quatre by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)