27 readers online now

99,251 comments by 26,347 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Confused...
Reader comment on item: Reagan's Early Victory in the War on Terror

Submitted by joe rose (United Kingdom), Jun 27, 2004 at 14:36

Dear Mr Pipes

Did President Reagan really fight terrorism? Or was per chance using this term as a convenient one to sell his policies abroad?. The fact, you see, is that I have just been reading some of Prof. Chomsky articles on Nicaragua, El salvador, Guatemala and Central America in general and I am a little confused. I understand that Chomsky is quite leftish, and maybe even pro-muslim (though I believe he is originally jew, not sure on this one), but even if just a fraction of what he says is true, then the Reagan administration (and maybe other american administrations as well) was involved in sponsosring state terrorism (El Salvador, Guatemala) and plain terrorism (Contra attacks aginst "soft" tragets). This I find shocking, since one of the main sins a country can commit, at least if I understand rightly Bush jr. speeches, is to sponsor or harbour terrorists.

I would very much appreciate your comments in this particulary, since I understand your political views are at the opposite end of the spectrum in respect to Chomsky.

Thank you in any case

Joe

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (26) on this item

Title By Date
Bravely gave them what they wanted. [39 words]Andy ShepAug 2, 2009 19:26
The fall of the Bastille was not due to a conspiracy. [85 words]William KinneyJul 5, 2004 23:15
the fall of the bastille [14 words]DebbieRossMar 28, 2006 16:32
⇒ Confused... [180 words]joe roseJun 27, 2004 14:36
Don't Gloss Over Reagan's Failure [166 words]Stephen VolkJun 21, 2004 21:15
Bravo Reagan [102 words]Jerry KrasnowJun 17, 2004 22:48
President Reagan [198 words]Jim WrightJun 17, 2004 17:40
If Only Communism had fallen in 1979... [73 words]tbroberts@cleansed.netJun 16, 2004 22:26
Reagan's win on terror. [27 words]Henri E. SebekJun 16, 2004 17:30
Carter proved a Christian can be dumb. [84 words]Larry Tooley, also a ChristianJun 16, 2004 13:58
are you certain? [252 words]john w. mcginleyJun 16, 2004 13:17
Reagan's contribution [88 words]bernardJun 15, 2004 23:28
The real problem [234 words]Darwin BarrettJun 15, 2004 18:52
Misplaced credit [70 words]Judith AntonelliJun 15, 2004 18:25
Not Clear Why Ayatollah Liked Reagan [174 words]WarrenJun 15, 2004 18:06
Reagan and terrorism [57 words]Mort ReichekJun 15, 2004 17:53
Mt. Rushmore should not be waiting [95 words]Martin SchulbergJun 15, 2004 17:49
Military Graffiti [53 words]LeonJun 15, 2004 16:34
Really? [49 words]JeremyJun 15, 2004 15:27
Excellent Educator [28 words]Alexander BarrettoJun 15, 2004 13:48
Reagan at fault [128 words]Dr. L. McClainJun 15, 2004 12:48
Whitewash [106 words]Bill ZeiseJun 15, 2004 12:13
Reagan did NOT understand terrorists [55 words]Howard VeitJun 15, 2004 12:07
Reagan and Iran
[w/response] [49 words]
James O'HaraJun 15, 2004 11:17
pipes, give us a break [120 words]michaelJun 15, 2004 11:10
Effective Psychological Warfare [98 words]Susan BradfordJun 15, 2004 11:02

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.