Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Civilian populations enable terrorists
Reader comment on item: Have Israelis Finally Learned the Strategic Value of Territory?

Submitted by Michael (United States), Jan 5, 2009 at 12:18

Just as it was the civilian population that enthusiastically gave legitimacy, authority, and power to Adolf Hitler and kept him in power to the bitter end so it is the civilian population of 1.5 million that gave Hamas legitimacy, authority, and power. At any time those 1.5 million Gazans can overwhelm the 20 thousand Hamas terrorists and put and end to their suffering and live in peace with Israel.

Until they do, the Gazan civilian population is responsible for their own tragedy and fate, not the Israelis. Just as in the American Civil war it was the civilian population of the South that prolonged the senseless killing of hundreds of thousands. General Sherman broke the defiant spirit of the Southern civilian population by his march through Georgia devistating their land and property. Humiliating the civilian population pursuaded them that their cause was too unbearable, too painful to continue. Peace quickly followed.

Civilian populations are responsible for the leaders and the government they elect and permit to stay in power. Individuals aside, civilian populations are responsible for the carnage they enable against themselves and others;they are not innocent. The Israelies should take a lesson from General Sherman and General Grant and make life intolerable in Gaza until the will to terror is crushed. The Arab countries surrounding Israel should welcome their Arab brethren into their own country releaving the dense getto that is Gaza and give them a future and full citizenship. The present and the future of Palistinians is one of their own making. Choose death and suffering by supporting terrorist leaders or run the mafioso thugs out of their territories and live in peace with their Israeli neighbors, who are arguably the most humane in the world.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (39) on this item

Title By Date
Could Mr Pipes or anyone help me understand why [623 words]Marcella, USJan 7, 2009 15:38
stop the misunderstanding on muslims attitude especially on martyrdorm [228 words]maiyangJan 9, 2009 00:45
ARAB EMIGRATION [135 words]CaroleJan 24, 2009 13:18
Whose land for peace? [757 words]Halley FaustJan 7, 2009 14:28
Media, the Craven Enemy of Humanity -- Ignores Legal Definition of "Disproportionate" and Uses the Sound Bite to Disinform -- Dore Gold Clarifies [205 words]Sofa SogoodJan 6, 2009 07:50
No No out-of-context givebacks! [87 words]MelMJan 5, 2009 23:50
Israel, That Special Country [241 words]JayJan 5, 2009 20:20
Mazel Tov but.. has Ehud Olmert learnt from the mistakes of 2006? [292 words]ShishirJan 5, 2009 13:50
⇒ Civilian populations enable terrorists [288 words]MichaelJan 5, 2009 12:18
The Withdraw for the Sinai was a terrible mistake ( and when many unsolvable problems began ) [69 words]James BurkeJan 5, 2009 10:51
Have Israelis Finally Learned that giving up their land which the LORD God has given them is not theirs but Gods! [155 words]VigilantJan 5, 2009 10:30
Prove to me that religion is true [74 words]Badr HariJan 9, 2009 15:33
Massacre of Israelis [104 words]CaroleJan 24, 2009 12:57
Israel should not give up one acre of land...Ever! [91 words]Ames TiedemanJan 5, 2009 09:17
The Morality of War [173 words]Ralph C Whaley MDJan 5, 2009 08:17
Territory [18 words]PhillipJan 5, 2009 07:33
Self-defense [168 words]Jolly JackJan 5, 2009 05:31
Hamas Out? PA In [325 words]Prof. Paul EidelbergJan 5, 2009 03:11
Media, the Craven Enemy of Humanity -- Ignores Definition of "Disproportionate" and Uses the Sound Bite to Disinform -- Dore Gold Clarifies [206 words]Sofa SogoodJan 5, 2009 02:47
Disproportionality of Israeli Response ? [349 words]Stephen HughesJan 4, 2009 15:41
Disproportionality -- Nonsense [39 words]Romesh ChanderJan 5, 2009 01:45
What is a proper proportion in warfare? [75 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 5, 2009 16:59
Maximum terror/minimum damage has its advantages (for Hamas) [131 words]MelMJan 5, 2009 17:37
Fresh Thinking is Needed [822 words]Steve BermanJan 4, 2009 10:28
I wish, but it misses the point: RELIGION [990 words]der AlleswisserJan 4, 2009 20:19
If Egypt were to possess Gaza... [48 words]Matthew C. MasottiJan 3, 2009 16:29
Egypt does not want any part of Gaza [112 words]Romesh ChanderJan 5, 2009 01:41
It's not just about territory [134 words]Fred SchlomkaJan 3, 2009 10:38
Have Israelis Finally Learned the Strategic Value of Territory? [2739 words]Tess McNamara B.A. Women's Studies, B.A Family Studies, Student of Islam....(Australia)Jan 3, 2009 04:38
Magnanimous Speech. [195 words]SvetlanachkahJan 4, 2009 14:34
Bravo Tess! You survived the liberal, academic community, [15 words]Kerry L. WinnJan 5, 2009 08:46
All good points except [38 words]ShishirJan 5, 2009 13:37
Palestinian People Must Feel the Pain [142 words]John HarrisJan 2, 2009 22:02
flaws in the argument [91 words]yuval BrandstetterJan 4, 2009 13:02
A brilliant observation Mr. Harris and so true [122 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 6, 2009 09:20
Mr. Pipes: I asked you years ago to not use the misnomer. "War on Terror " as there is no such thing.
[w/response] [77 words]
Steve BorkowskiJan 2, 2009 16:32
Land for Peace policy [114 words]Jon PurizhanskyJan 2, 2009 11:54
What about Sinai [61 words]WayneJan 2, 2009 04:14
No Wayne [35 words]Kerry L. WinnJan 5, 2009 08:50

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page