Submitted by Hilare (France), Mar 5, 2004 at 07:04
Dear Mister Pipes,
Beyond your current article, as usual well documented and meaningfull, i just can point out that you soundly argued for the obvious : mahomedan people always prefere islamic rules. Please note that they never refer to "militant" islamic rules, nor "islamist" rules. No, simply islamic rules. In few words : the Qoran, only the Qoran.
Of course Mister Pipes, you're right when you take fright of this, islamic rules as source of legislation, to have serious consequences.
As mahomedan people are right to be truly confident in islamic rules, to achieve what they have been educated to "want", and what is called by some irresponsible leftists : "militant" islam or islamism. 1300 years of constant results may give them rock certainty, no ?
So Mister Pipes, no surprise here. [the debate is already over] ? Of course it is. 1300 years of history have teached everybody that mahomedan people, as they have been educated to "think", consider islamic rules as the source of secular / civilian right. To be definite, they even don't consider any difference between secular / civilian and religious being. And islamic rules are everything but not Human rights. At least, those facts are far from a stretch.
So, who could have imagined that a foreign army, even a liberation army, would ever have the ability to change 1300 years of one-way history with democratic rules ? This sounds as a joke, isn't it ?
To draw a conclusion from this current article, i will be very interested, Mister Pipes, to read how you can match your today and very accuracy observation, with another fresh article of your, titled : [Study the Koran?] ?
I think it will be full of lessons to be learned, to read an author hardly be suspected of sympathizing with any islamic drift, explain how he can state one day : "islam is not the reponsible, only islamist drift / people is", and observe some days after : "islamic rules, so islam rules, is leading to the islamic drift".
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Al Sadr [95 words] | E. R. Anders | Apr 20, 2008 08:18 |
| Iraqi Constitution [22 words] | Lynn | Mar 14, 2008 10:06 |
| Theological Resolutions to Iraq [237 words] | Jason Smith | Mar 29, 2006 13:43 |
| Partner? [30 words] | Clarkson Andreas Potter | Jun 13, 2004 01:04 |
| Sharia law in Iraq [152 words] | Michael Elvin | Mar 17, 2004 06:51 |
| Totalitarian Ideology [143 words] | Arlinda DeAngelis | Mar 14, 2004 12:19 |
| universally accepted laws? [159 words] | Sir Daniel Tobin | Mar 9, 2004 12:52 |
| ↔ Islam vs. Democracy:? [321 words] | Josefina Carranza | Mar 29, 2006 13:35 |
| Inform more folks [73 words] | Max A. Holcher | Mar 8, 2004 12:04 |
| Bravo Dan Pipes!!! [141 words] | T. Norge | Mar 8, 2004 03:21 |
| Sharia- Legislating Iraq back to the 14th Century? [184 words] | William Wolfson | Mar 7, 2004 21:04 |
| when will people learn [82 words] | joey | Mar 5, 2004 20:33 |
| Source can be perverted [132 words] | Sam | Mar 5, 2004 17:47 |
| Islamic Laws in Iraq [104 words] | Mike | Mar 5, 2004 17:38 |
| ↔ My opinon [50 words] | Jennipher | Jan 8, 2008 19:48 |
| ⇒ Any major stir ? [333 words] | Hilare | Mar 5, 2004 07:04 |
| Break Up of Iraq [62 words] | Reni Roberts | Mar 4, 2004 18:42 |
| Fear or ignorance? [132 words] | suleiman | Mar 4, 2004 16:57 |
| Islam as part of the law [125 words] | Lenn Chow | Mar 3, 2004 23:03 |
| I couldn't agree more! [222 words] | Roger Quarton | Mar 3, 2004 22:38 |
| You are correct that Islamic law will take Iraq down [293 words] | Roger E. Nasiff | Mar 3, 2004 19:13 |
| Is Anyone Surprised? [169 words] | Darwin Barrett | Mar 3, 2004 17:38 |
| Oppression is inevitable. [269 words] | William A. Tomlinson | Mar 3, 2004 17:25 |
| ↔ The 'Palestinian' Oppression by 'Palestinians' [313 words] | Free | Nov 28, 2006 14:08 |
| ↔ Propaganda [70 words] | Samer | Sep 2, 2008 07:14 |
| Islam [97 words] | David L Lamon | Mar 3, 2004 16:55 |
| Divide Iraq into ethnic enclaves [145 words] | Harvey Fleetwood | Mar 3, 2004 14:47 |
| ↔ Iraq divided [27 words] | Chuck | Feb 19, 2007 08:08 |
| sharia [65 words] | bill poltarak | Mar 3, 2004 12:02 |
| We just gave up the ghost. [82 words] | Bernard Ross | Mar 3, 2004 11:43 |
| Richard, the camel and the democratically chosen dictatorship [213 words] | A Mendelson | Mar 3, 2004 09:29 |
| Not hopeful [93 words] | brad bucher | Mar 3, 2004 08:39 |
| Quibble [331 words] | Michael Elzufon | Mar 3, 2004 08:28 |
| Win again, lose the Peace [206 words] | Harold Dodson | Mar 2, 2004 22:07 |
| ↔ When Will The Non-Muslims Wake Up? [544 words] | Fish | Oct 1, 2008 03:59 |
| How true and how sad! [76 words] | Alain David Hashimoto | Mar 2, 2004 22:04 |
| Sharia Law counters Democracy and Human Rights [145 words] | Mike Ramirez | Mar 2, 2004 19:15 |
| The Sharia Compromise [61 words] | Thomas Rekdal | Mar 2, 2004 19:01 |
| What a Mess [140 words] | Peter J. Herz | Mar 2, 2004 18:31 |
| Question [39 words] | Gary Perlstein | Mar 2, 2004 17:55 |
| Islamic Law & Iraq [33 words] | Jim O'Brien | Mar 2, 2004 17:33 |
| ↔ a response to Islamic Law & Iraq by reader Jim O'Brien [25 words] | Mike | Feb 2, 2007 19:58 |
| Implementing Sharia Law in Iraq [59 words] | Walter F. Gray | Mar 2, 2004 16:44 |