Since the ouster of Saddam Hussein in 2003, the U.S. taxpayer has been rebuilding Iraq and – for just as long – I have been complaining about this being unnecessary and even counterproductive. (See here, here, and here for sample critiques.)

Comes a report today by Timothy Williams in the New York Times, "U.S. Fears Iraqis Will Not Keep Up Rebuilt Projects" that tops off my unhappiness. Excerpts:

Continue to full text of posting...

November 21, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (1)

Berlin Wall Fell, Obama Stays Away

National Review asked, "How big a deal is it that the president won't be going to Germany to commemorate the 20th anniversary of the Berlin Wall?" My response follows; what others wrote can be found at "Forgetting the Fall."

Let us meditate briefly on Obama and the year 1989.

In one of the first interviews of his fledgling presidency, on January 27, 2009, Obama informed the audience of an Arabic-language television channel that he hoped to restore "the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago."

How interesting that Obama praised 1989 as a time of exemplary U.S.-Muslim relations, and not the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Nineteen eighty-nine was an undistinguished year for U.S.-Muslim relations but it was before the U.S. government had sought to democratize the region. It was when Washington still focused on getting along with kings, presidents, emirs, and other autocrats. Obama's phrasing, Fouad Ajami points out, signals "a return to Realpolitik and business-as-usual" in relations with Muslims.

The president's decision to skip the celebrations in Berlin, thus, fits a larger pattern of nostalgia for the good old days before George W. Bush's "freedom agenda" and its inconvenient tensions with dictators. (November 6, 2009)

November 6, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (12)

Nidal Hasan – Initial Thoughts on the Ft. Hood Jihadi

Was the Ft. Hood massacre an act of terrorism? For two reasons, I find this an unproductive question. First, terrorism has, in one count, 109 definitions, making this a question more suited to mulling over in a university seminar than to public policy. Second, an attack on soldiers is by definition not terrorism. Better to ask, then: Was this an act of jihad, that is, an attack intended to help Muslims vanquish infidels so as to impose Islamic law on them?

The New York Daily News captured Hasan's personality in one line: "a soldier who didn't want to go to war, a man of God who defended murder and a doctor who shot up the soldiers he was supposed to heal." Or this little gem from the Associated Press: "He required counseling as a medical student because of problems with patients."

Hasan is not some street hoodlum like Hasan Karim Akbar but a Ph.D. in psychology who had a role advising in a task force presenting homeland security options to the new administration in January 2009.

If Hasan merely wanted to get out of being deployed in Afghanistan, he could have shot his toe, not gone on a rampage killing 14 people. (November 6, 2009)

November 6, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (7)

Karzai's Brother and Washington's Kept Politicians

Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of Afghan president Hamid Karzai (pictured) is reportedly on the American payroll.

Ahmed Wali Karzai, brother of the Afghan president, "a go-between between the Americans and the Taliban," and "a suspected player in the country's booming illegal opium trade," the New York Times informs us, "gets regular payments from the Central Intelligence Agency, and has for much of the past eight years."

This unsavory news has many negative implications about Hamid Karzai's presidency; the one that interests me most is how it confirms his status as a kept politician, a leader who enjoys his present position due to foreign backing.

Continue to full text of posting...

October 28, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (20)

That Nobel Peace Prize: Bashes Bush, Handcuffs Obama

"He won what?" is the universal first reaction.

And second, at least on the Right: "Why did they do that?"

Thorbjørn Jagland, Chair of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee, proudly displays a picture of President Obama.

Even the Nobel committee's citation does not pretend Barack Obama has actually achieved anything. Rather, it was given to him "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." That's efforts, not achievements.

Reading carefully through the entire citation suggests that Obama is being celebrated for two reasons. Its chatter about "a new climate," the United Nations, a "vision of a world free from nuclear arms," and "great climatic challenges" points to his being the anti-George W. Bush.

Second, the prize committee hopes to constrain Obama's hands vis-à-vis Iran. It lauds him for not using force: "Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts." This is obviously gibberish: whereas Bush did not use force against North Korea, Obama does not rely on dialogue in Afghanistan. But the statement does pressure Obama not to use force in the theater that counts the most, namely the Iranian nuclear build-up.

So, from the Leftist Norwegian point of view, it's a twofer – bash Bush and handcuff Obama.

My prediction: The absurdity of the prize decision will harm Obama politically in the United States, contrasting his role as international celebrity with his record devoid of accomplishments. Michael Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee, notes that Obama "won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action." Expect to hear much more along those lines.

October 9, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (27)

American Taxpayers Promote Islam on My Website

The U.S. government ad promoting Islamthat appeared today at www.DanielPipes.org.

I've devoted considerable attention to U.S. government patronage of Islam (see here, here, here, and here), noting how Islam gets a favorable attention not given to other religions.

Imagine, then, my surprise to note that, as of today, the U.S. government is promoting Islam here, at www.DanielPipes.org, on my own website! The colorful ad, provided through Google AdSense, reads "Ramadan Around the World: A Mosaic of Traditions" and clicking on it links to a page at www.America.gov titled "A Multicultural Ramadan." The copy there explains: "American Muslims trace their ancestry to more than 80 countries. America.gov explores the richness of these traditions through the lens of Ramadan."

Comment: Is this a bribe to get me to accept official patronage of Islam? Just kidding. (September 6, 2009)

The webpage linked to from the ad on my website.

September 6, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (0)

American Taxpayer Money Spent on Eradicating Hebrew-Language Signs

A road sign with Hebrew.

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), an independent federal agency "that receives overall foreign policy guidance from the Secretary of State" has embarked on a four-year, $20-million project to help Palestinians prepare for statehood in the West Bank by replacing road signs that include Arabic, English, and Hebrew with ones just in Arabic and English.

Comment: So much for the prospects of normalization, harmonious peace, or a Palestinian population content to live side-by-side with Israel. (August 27, 2009)

August 27, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (38)

"Jewish" - Not the Same as "Pro-Israel"

It's an obvious point, but it needs stating:

Not all Jews are Zionist. Some believe in universal socialism, some support Palestinians, others hold that only God can create a Jewish state or have been disappointed since 1977 when the right first came to power in Israel. Some openly hate Israel, others pretend it does not exist, and the most crafty of them present themselves as Zionist.
Plenty of non-Jews are Zionist. Christian Zionism began in nineteenth-century Great Britain, included many leading American personalities, culminated with Lord Balfour and Harry S Truman, and today, as I put it in 2003, "other than the Israel Defense Forces, America's Christian Zionists may be the Jewish state's ultimate strategic asset."

Continue to full text of posting...

August 18, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (69)

Reflections on the Sixth Fatah General Congress

Four observations on the Sixth Fatah General Congress, which took place in Bethlehem on August 4-9:

The Fatah leadership openly played to the Palestinian street, ignoring Washington or Jerusalem: Examples indicative of the intended audience:

At the opening ceremony, Palestinian Media Watch reports, "Fatah leaders responded with loud applause when two terrorists who committed the worst terror attack in Israel's history were referred to as heroic Martyrs by former PA Prime Minister Abu Alaa."
Ahmed Tibi, a member of the Israeli parliament, termed Israelis living within the 1949 lines "settlers" and declared that "Whoever came last should be the first to leave."
Jibril Rajoub announced that "Resistance [DP: i.e., terrorism] was and is a tactical and strategic option of the struggle."
Zakaria Zubeidi advised Palestinians to ready themselves for the possibility that "it is war that Israel wants, and not peace."

Continue to full text of posting...

August 14, 2009 | Permalink | Comments (10)

Continue to Blog Archive

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.

New Postings

Hot Topics

Noteworthy

Recently Updated Blog Entries

Most Viewed Articles

Most Mailed Articles

Recent Translations

Recent Reader Comments

Blog

More on Maj. Hasan's Islamist Life

Wasted U.S. Spending in Iraq: $53 billion and Counting

Berlin Wall Fell, Obama Stays Away

Nidal Hasan – Initial Thoughts on the Ft. Hood Jihadi

Karzai's Brother and Washington's Kept Politicians

That Nobel Peace Prize: Bashes Bush, Handcuffs Obama

American Taxpayers Promote Islam on My Website

American Taxpayer Money Spent on Eradicating Hebrew-Language Signs

"Jewish" - Not the Same as "Pro-Israel"

Reflections on the Sixth Fatah General Congress