69 million page views

Yes, for the religious, "accidents" have purpose...

Reader comment on item: [After Sharon:] Israeli Politics Will Revert to Its Past
in response to reader comment: Some say "The Work Of The Great Sharon Should Continue."?

Submitted by J.S. (Canada), Jan 12, 2006 at 19:38

but...for those of a more secular bent...we have to look for rational explanations if any lessons are to be learned...not try to fathom out Divine plans...or read minds...(I believe this is, in part, Pat Robertson's mistake...he believes he can somehow assume Divine authority...incredibly arrogant, isn't it?...but Pat is just another idiot...)

anyway, I'm not entirely convinced that Sharon was a leftist "peacenik" (even though, on certain occasions, he may have lapsed into certain kinds of rhetoric...it remains rhetoric...and rhetoric is of far less importance than what Sharon did -- and let's not forget the elimination of a number of terrorist leaders..)

I also think it's too soon to put a feather in the cap of the Lunatic / Suicidal Left...(and this is what seems to happen whenever the Left starts crowing about Sharon's "pacifism"). Sharon's stress on security should be mentioned...(the Left needs to be reminded of this whenever they start claiming Sharon as one of their own..)
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Yes, for the religious, "accidents" have purpose... by J.S.

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2022 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)