bite the bullet

Submitted by rw (United States), Aug 4, 2016 at 04:24

Dear Dr Pipes,

Given that the most dangerous threat in the world is Iran and the probability of them developing nuclear weapons that they would have no scruple about using on infidels, might it not be wiser to support the one candidate, however malodorous, who might be disposed to do something about it?

Isn't that one threat sufficient to override all other factors?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".