69 million page views

90M Hindus were killed by muslims during jihad in India

Reader comment on item: Turkey's Last Free Election
in response to reader comment: Muslims killed 90 M hindus? True or false.

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 26, 2011 at 13:56

Our dear Naushad whose hindu ancestors were brutalized by islam and 90M of them were killed by Muslims but does he care?

I found something for you from wikipedia.

wikipedia is your source! really? and di you read it before you posted it/ let me guess you did not right?

>Digest it.

Sohanallah he found "something" and alhamdulelah it is a wikepedia article written by author unknown right mr Einstein

Hint: when using a reference you should have the name of the author ready because how do you know that this is not a tendentious view of an ignorant deobandi/tablighhe like you? you tell use

For the readers another great source of jihad in India from the7th to the 20th century you can read the great review by Dr. Andrew Bostom in his collection: "The Legacy of Jihad" and for this see

jihad in the indian subcontinent seventh through twentieth centuries pages 627-659 published by Prometheus books 2005

Take your time and read a reall book mr Einstein if you can read a book beyond the book of ignorance

Oh there is more in the same collection

K. S. Lal writings about the invasion of India by your masters the Muslims and you can read

1. Muslims invade India pages 433-456

2. Jihad under the Turks and jihad under the Mughals pages 456-461

3. The origins of Muslim slave trade 529-534

4. Slaving taking during Muslim rule pages 535-548

5. Enslavement of Hindus by Arabs and Turkish invaders pages 549-554

I'm sure them kuffar in South Africa have public libraries so go and read and refute what Lal is saying and you will make a fool of yourself and as if I care

>"Considerable controversy exists both in scholarly and public opinion about the conversions to Islam typically represented by the following schools of thought:[84]The bulk of Muslims are descendants of migrants from the Iranian plateau or Arabs.[85]Conversions occurred for non-religious reasons of pragmatism and patronage such as social mobility among the Muslim ruling elite or for relief from taxes[84][85]Conversion was a result of the actions of SunniSufi saints and involved a genuine change of heart[84]Conversion came from Buddhists and the en masse conversions of lower castes for social liberation and as a rejection of the oppressive Hindu caste strictures.[85]A combination, initially made under duress followed by a genuine change of heart[84]As a socio-cultural process of diffusion and integration over an extended period of time into the sphere of the dominant Muslim civilization and global polity at large.[85]

What does this have to do with the fact that 90M of your Hindu ancestors were killed by your masters the Muslims? you tell us

>Embedded within this lies the concept of Islam as a foreign imposition

Hello: even your Allah would agree that islam is a "foreign imposition" in India as he says

wa ma arsalna men rasulin ila bilisani qawmihi

which means that islam is indeed a foreign imposition on the people of India and it is the religion of the Hijazi Arabs only

>and Hinduism being a natural condition of the natives who resisted, resulting in the failure of the project to Islamicize the Indian subcontinent and is highly embroiled within the politics of the partition and communalism in India.[84]

If we are to believe your Allah in the above ayay then Hinduism is indeed the religion of India so who was the rasul that was sent to your Hindu ancestors because he ain't Muhammad could it be Ganesh or is it Rama?

>An estimate of the number of people killed,

Then Hindus were killed by Muslims thank you our dear Naushad the qeustion now is how many right?

>based on the Muslim chronicles and demographic calculations, was done by K.S. Lal in his book Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India, who claimed that between 1000 CE and 1500 CE, the population of Hindus decreased by 80 million.

Well these "disappearing" Indians could be

1. That they were killed by your masters the muslims

2. Or there was a natural disaster be it floods or fires or or volcanoes or tsunamis or god knows what and they got killed

3. or it can be because of disease as in the plague and they died

4. or that indians en masse decided to go on a European vacation and they never went back to India and 90M of them left

5. Or those missing Indians are hiding some place in India wanting to be found and they are playing "hide and seek"

So which one is it mr Einstein? Let me help you they were killed the question is by whom? and how many were killed

Hint: your masters the Arabs and muslims and 90M of them were killed

>His work has come under criticism by historians such as Simon Digby (School of Oriental and African Studies) and Irfan Habib for its agenda and lack of accurate data in pre-census times.

Hello: we know we did not have accurate census data and these were estimates and what a joke

So what does our dear Ifran Habib say about why did they disapear?

>Lal has responded to these criticisms in later works.

So what did he say? care to enlighten us?

>Historians such as Will Durant contend that Islam was spread through violence.[86][87]

Oh yeah Islam was speard through violence

Oh my evidence? The Quranic ayat al-sayf

> Sir Jadunath Sarkar contends that several Muslim invaders were waging a systematic jihad against Hindus in India to the effect that "Every device short of massacre in cold blood was resorted to in order to convert heathen subjects."[88] Hindus who converted to Islam were not immune to persecution due to the Muslim Caste System in India established by Ziauddin al-Barani in the Fatawa-i Jahandari.,[89] where they were regarded as an "Ajlaf" caste and subjected to discrimination by the "Ashraf" castes[90]

And who says that Muslims are equal so there is also caste system in islam in India and as if we did not know

>Disputers of the "Conversion by the Sword Theory" point to the presence of the large Muslim communities found in Southern India, Sri Lanka, Western Burma, Bangladesh, Southern Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia coupled with the distinctive lack of equivalent Muslim communities around the heartland of historical Muslim Empires in the Indian Sub-Continent as refutation to the "Conversion by the Sword Theory". The legacy of the Muslim conquest of South Asia is a hotly debated issue and argued even today. Different population estimates by economics historian Angus Maddison and by Jean-Noël Biraben also indicate that India's population did not decrease between 1000 and 1500, but increased by about 35 million during that time.[91][92]

Hello: you just told us that there was no census so make up your mind

Not all Muslim invaders were simply raiders. Later rulers fought on to win kingdoms and stayed to create new ruling dynasties. The practices of these new rulers and their subsequent heirs (some of whom were borne of Hindu wives) varied considerably. While some were uniformly hated, others developed a popular following. According to the memoirs of Ibn Batuta who travelled through Delhi in the 14th century, one of the previous sultans had been especially brutal and was deeply hated by Delhi's population, Batuta's memoirs also indicate that Muslims from the Arab world, Persia and Anatolia were often favored with important posts at the royal courts suggesting that locals may have played a somewhat subordinate role in the Delhi administration. The term "Turk" was commonly used to refer to their higher social status. S.A.A. Rizvi (The Wonder That Was India - II), however points to Muhammad bin Tughlaq as not only encouraging locals but promoting artisan groups such as cooks, barbers and gardeners to high administrative posts. In his reign, it is likely that conversions to Islam took place as a means of seeking greater social mobility and improved social standing.[93]

Islamic gobbledygook

So you told us that you will refute that 90M Hindu your ancestors were killed by Muslims and your article tells that that indeed many indians were killed by your masters the Muslims the question is how many. K l Lal and Durant believe that 80M were killed and our dear Ifran says that there was an increase of 32M Hindus do you think that this might have been the group that went on a European vacation and they just headed back to India?or may be those ones that were playing hide and seek

They were killed and shame on you

So do your self a favor next time READ the article that you are using as reference first but again this is the Muslim mind ...

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to 90M Hindus were killed by muslims during jihad in India by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)