69 million page views

Personal attacks on Pipes

Reader comment on item: How Central Is Muslim Anti-Semitism?

Submitted by Richard Burd (United States), Jun 26, 2002 at 13:54

I knew it, MPAC can't refute what Daniel says so they resort to the only thing they have left: they launch a personal attack on him, and then Pipes gets pissed off and reminds her (and informs us) that there's an 'agreement' not to mount personal attacks, because it is not part of the 'agenda.' This whole thing has played itself out before, MPAC hates Daniel, and he hates their Islamist agenda, they know he's right and their wrong so they resort to the only thing they have left, the card. I love it. Daniel you're a patriot.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)