54 readers online now

98,582 comments by 26,202 readers

Go to Mobile Site
Homepage Articles Blog Reviews Spoken Books Other Languages Biographical Middle East Forum About this site Mailing List

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

• Computers
• Electronics
• Communication
• Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

If not Pipes Then Who
Reader comment on item: Where's the Muslim Debate?

Submitted by Paul Rinderle (United States), May 22, 2003 at 20:33

I have never read one critical article by any of our politicians of Islam fundamentals. Not one Senator or Representative. I will tell you why that's so: Islamists are contributing to their campaigns.

If not Mr. Pipes then who is going to take on this political entity that threatens all our constitutional rights to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Islam fundamentals is the antithesis of all that a free society stands for.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (32) on this item

Title By Date
Hussain Haqqani [116 words]M Saleem ChaudhryMay 1, 2008 22:54
The Real Daniel Pipes [69 words]James J. Lynch, Jr.Jun 25, 2003 11:14
Daniel Pipes appointment to the U.S. Institute of Peace [226 words]Carol CassadyJun 6, 2003 02:17
Silent Islam [78 words]Gene BehlJun 4, 2003 17:59
Arab nations insular world view breeds mistrust and hatred [135 words]Joan ArchibaJun 3, 2003 23:16
Can there ever be reasoned debate? [66 words]S.C.PandaMay 28, 2003 02:08
Too much tolerance? [145 words]Sylvia SydneyMay 27, 2003 08:21
A fine commentary. [15 words]Gary NewmanMay 26, 2003 07:27
Where's Daniel Pipes in the Muslim Debate? [167 words]Wahid BoctorMay 25, 2003 17:14
You are correct [11 words]Carole WrightMay 25, 2003 10:27
Islam Highjacked! [210 words]John W. McGinleyMay 25, 2003 09:45
Well done [49 words]Maria SliwaMay 24, 2003 23:07
Go, Dan, GO! [141 words]Sir Daniel M.J.TobinMay 24, 2003 14:53
↔ Segmentation of communities/socities [201 words]M Saleem ChaudhryMay 5, 2008 19:15
Gratitude [222 words]Bill BonnesarMay 24, 2003 13:55
I agree 100% [43 words]Muhammad SiddiquiMay 24, 2003 11:53
An Opinion Poll Of The Beliefs Of Muslim Leaders [220 words]Joel BenjaminMay 24, 2003 10:19
Haqqini [33 words]Joan BernsteinMay 23, 2003 20:23
It should only happen... [166 words]Gerald KreadenMay 23, 2003 19:54
Approve the Pipes Appointment [22 words]Elizabeth S. MarksMay 23, 2003 19:37
WE AGREE [14 words]BEN DIRECTORMay 23, 2003 16:20
The Muslim Debate???? [41 words]Bob BucknerMay 23, 2003 14:11
Reply to Mr. Haqqani: Thank-you [204 words]john mcginleyMay 23, 2003 13:48
Debate? [181 words]Edmund JamesMay 23, 2003 10:31
where's the muslim debate? [130 words]artMay 23, 2003 09:25
A voice of reason. [423 words]Graham SpenceMay 23, 2003 06:09
The Institute for Peace [243 words]Arlinda DeAngelisMay 22, 2003 22:53
Hurrah for Mr Haqqani [117 words]Bruce L. MurrayMay 22, 2003 22:42
I support Daniel Pipes' appointment to the USIP... [33 words]Dave RichardsMay 22, 2003 20:44
⇒ If not Pipes Then Who [73 words]Paul RinderleMay 22, 2003 20:33
Kudos! [20 words]Ben PluniMay 22, 2003 16:29
Hear--hear! [180 words]Robert G. DesmondMay 22, 2003 15:32

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.