69 million page views

Educate Keith Ellison

Reader comment on item: Talking Freely about the Enemy
in response to reader comment: US Muslim Congressman causes uproar : An eye opener for all those Americans who voted for this Jehadi

Submitted by Bob Christiansen (United States), Jan 15, 2007 at 20:21

What Thomas Jefferson learned from the Muslim book of jihad
The U.S Veteran Dispatch Ted Sampley

Democrat Keith Ellison is now officially the first Muslim United States congressman. True to his pledge, he placed his hand on the Quran, the
Muslim book of jihad and pledged his allegiance to the United States during his ceremonial swearing-in. Capitol Hill staff said Ellison's swearing-in photo opportunity drew more media than they had ever seen in the history of the U.S. House. Ellison represents the 5th Congressional District of Minnesota.

The Quran Ellison used was no ordinary book. It once belonged to Thomas Jefferson, third president of the United States and one of America's founding fathers. Ellison borrowed it from the Rare Book Section of the Library of Congress. It was one of the 6,500 Jefferson books archived in the library. Ellison, who was born in Detroit and converted to Islam while in college, said he chose to use Jefferson's Quran because it showed that "a visionary like Jefferson" believed that wisdom could be gleaned from many sources.

There is no doubt Ellison was right about Jefferson believing wisdom could be "gleaned" from the Muslim Quran. At the time Jefferson owned the book, he needed to know everything possible about Muslims because he was about to advocate war against the Islamic "Barbary" states of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Tripoli. Ellison's use of Jefferson's Quran as a prop illuminates a subject once well-known in the history of the United States, but, which today, is mostly forgotten - the Muslim pirate slavers who over many centuries enslaved millions of Africans and tens of thousands of Christian Europeans and Americans in the Islamic "Barbary" states.

Over the course of 10 centuries, Muslim pirates cruised the African and Mediterranean coastline, pillaging villages and seizing slaves. The taking of slaves in pre-dawn raids on unsuspecting coastal villages had a high casualty rate. It was typical of Muslim raiders to kill off as many of the "non-Muslim" older men and women as possible so the preferred "booty" of only young women and children could be collected.

Young non-Muslim women were targeted because of their value as concubines in Islamic markets. Islamic law provides for the sexual interests of Muslim men by allowing them to take as many as four wives at one time and to have as many concubines as their fortunes allow. Boys, as young as 9 or 10 years old, were often mutilated to create eunuchs who would bring higher prices in the slave markets of the Middle
East. Muslim slave traders created "eunuch stations" along major African slave routes so the necessary surgery could be performed. It was estimated that only a small number of the boys subjected to the mutilation survived after the surgery.

When American colonists rebelled against British rule in 1776, American merchant ships lost Royal Navy protection. With no American Navy
for protection, American ships were attacked and their Christian crews enslaved by Muslim pirates operating under the control of the "Dey of
Algiers"--an Islamist warlord ruling Algeria. Because American commerce in the Mediterranean was being destroyed by the pirates, the Continental Congress agreed in 1784 to negotiate treaties with the four Barbary States. Congress appointed a special commission consisting of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and BenjaminFranklin, to oversee the negotiations.

Lacking the ability to protect its merchant ships in the Mediterranean, the new America government tried to appease the Muslim slavers by agreeing to pay tribute and ransoms in order to retrieve seized American ships and buy the freedom of enslaved sailors. Adams argued in favor of paying tribute as the cheapest way to get American commerce in the Mediterranean moving again. Jefferson was opposed. He believed there would be no end to the demands for tribute and wanted matters settled "through the medium of war." He proposed a league of trading nations to force an end to Muslim piracy.

In 1786, Jefferson, then the American ambassador to France, and Adams, then the American ambassador to Britain, met in London with Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the "Dey of Algiers" ambassador to Britain. The Americans wanted to negotiate a peace treaty based on Congress'
vote to appease. During the meeting Jefferson and Adams asked the Dey's ambassador why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

In a later meeting with the American Congress, the two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam "was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran, that all nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as Prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise."

For the following 15 years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to 20 percent of United States government annual revenues in 1800.
Not long after Jefferson's inauguration as president in 1801, he dispatched a group of frigates to defend American interests in the Mediterranean, and informed Congress. Declaring that America was going to spend "millions for defense but not one cent for tribute," Jefferson pressed the issue by deploying American Marines and many of America's best warships to the Muslim Barbary Coast. The USS Constitution, USS Constellation, USS Philadelphia, USS Chesapeake, USS Argus, USS Syren and USS Intrepid all saw action.

In 1805, American Marines marched across the desert from Egypt into Tripolitania, forcing the surrender of Tripoli and the freeing of all
American slaves. During the Jefferson administration, the Muslim Barbary States, crumbling as a result of intense American naval bombardment and on shore raids by Marines, finally officially agreed to abandon slavery and piracy.

Jefferson's victory over the Muslims lives on today in the Marine Hymn, with the line, "From the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli,
we will fight our country's battles on the land as on the sea." It wasn't until 1815 that the problem was fully settled by the total defeat of all the Muslim slave trading pirates. Jefferson had been right. The "medium of war" was the only way to put and end to the Muslim problem.

Mr. Ellison was right about Jefferson. He was a "visionary" wise enough to read and learn about the enemy from their own Muslim book of jihad.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Tribal religion [78 words]Muslimk***Feb 13, 2010 16:12168868
Islamic Brutality [327 words]MathewsJul 5, 2010 15:31168868
Geert and Dr. Pipes are Right [226 words]GWKFeb 5, 2010 04:34168491
odd isn't it [60 words]dennisJan 20, 2010 06:20167606
Re-interpretation of Sharia is good but it is not enoough [198 words]AbhiMay 9, 2009 14:38155158
You know the story of the cat... [115 words]yidlmitnfidlMar 12, 2009 16:23152175
Cassius Clay a terrorist? [61 words]MycosMar 12, 2009 23:52152175
31Why Geert Wilders is Right and Dr. Pipes Wrong on Islam [932 words]SinghaMar 10, 2009 23:47152069
Literal interpretations [453 words]MycosMar 12, 2009 23:38152069
Literal Islam? Non Sequitur [129 words]SinghaMar 16, 2009 10:52152069
Jesus Christ throughout history... [127 words]LynnMar 9, 2009 07:22151922
Examples of re-interpretation of Islamic Sharia in modern times [277 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
SaniMar 8, 2009 18:55151884
It is dictatorship from above [158 words]G.VishvasMar 10, 2009 09:37151884
Interesting about Ayatollah Khomeini -- another reason to prefer the Shiites [123 words]Charles MartelMar 10, 2009 11:30151884
Chameleon [79 words]LynnMar 14, 2009 23:27151884
Daniel Pipes is in the right ! [222 words]Anne-Marie DelcambreMar 21, 2009 14:37151884
Further Vroad Question for Dr. Pipes [58 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
AlexMar 23, 2009 20:21151884
suprise surprise: allowed to suspend basic principles of Islamic theology [46 words]mythJan 21, 2010 13:49151884
the traditional islamic woman [37 words]mythJan 21, 2010 13:56151884
Examples of re-interpretation of Islamic Sharia in modern times-Response [200 words]ctwFeb 23, 2010 06:38151884
Truth or opinion? [243 words]Rebecca MouldsMar 7, 2009 15:18151824
US Muslim Congressman causes uproar : An eye opener for all those Americans who voted for this Jehadi [206 words]shurikDec 8, 2006 16:5968815
is there a Muslim in the House? [190 words]donvanDec 11, 2006 13:3368815
Educate Keith Ellison [1094 words]Bob ChristiansenJan 15, 2007 20:2168815
What Islam is [427 words]Mitzi AlvinDec 27, 2005 13:0130639
token.... [92 words]donvanDec 12, 2006 10:2130639
To Mitzi Alvin [123 words]RioMar 21, 2009 10:1030639
With literal meanings, religions can be ugly (unbeautiful) and bad. [143 words]AbhiMay 9, 2009 15:1730639
What Islam peaceful? [150 words]surJul 20, 2009 12:0030639
Dude [10 words]RioJul 22, 2009 01:3130639
1Sure people kill. [69 words]surJul 22, 2009 20:2130639
So not to point fingers [122 words]RioJul 24, 2009 01:3530639
Its time to point the finger. [174 words]surAug 30, 2009 17:1030639
1finger still pointing at Islam. [176 words]surAug 30, 2009 17:5430639

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2017 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes