Literal Islam? Non Sequitur
Reader comment on item: Talking Freely about the Enemy
in response to reader comment: Literal interpretations

Submitted by Singha (India), Mar 16, 2009 at 10:52

If you're going to call my position "wrong", at least have the intellectual honesty to challenge the FACTS I have presented. I confronted the specific PROBLEMS presented by MODERATE ISLAM PARADIGM, using real facts. Instead, all you can do is pull some half-baked judgements, bereft of any connections to my position (I did not even remotely refer in my comment to literal islam). I had written that the personality of mohummad, different from the personality of jesus makes difficult, evolution and sustenance of a non fanatical (physically non violent) paradigm in islam. I also wrote how problems presented by islam was successfully reconciled by Kemal Ataturk. It's indeed far easier to make a baseless comment about me than face the truth about the terror sponsoring, Islamic supremacist rogue ideology.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.