69 million page views

Revamping the UN

Reader comment on item: After Saddam? Remaking the Mideast

Submitted by Shep Fargotstein (United States), Feb 13, 2003 at 10:10

President Bush could easily put the UN, France and Germany on the defensive by stating the obvious: The UN must be reorganized, or face the same fate as the League of Nations. The first order of business should be to take a good look at the actual members of the General Assembly (GA) and the Security Council (SC).

It is rather bizarre that after the formation of the EU, France still maintains its status as a member of the UN Security Council. It is even stranger that the global press has barely even mentioned it. If common sense and fair play were attributes of the UN, which hasn't been the case for decades, they would relinquish their seat for a single EU chair, and give India - whose global weight based on it's population, it's economic importance, and it's responsible use of it's formidable nuclear industry, it's rightful place among it's peers. While they're at it, the 15 European countries that sit at the General Assembly should receive only one seat – just like the US. The current 5 rotating General Assembly members who get to sit at the Security Council, of which 2 are Spain and Germany (plus France), effectively gives the EU 3 seats verses the single US seat.

If the EU, led by France and Germany, want to flex their collective political muscle in defiance of the US, they must be willing to level the playing field. To do otherwise would expose them and the UN for what it is: A collection of third world banana republics, violent dictators, and dubious self righteous European countries - hell bent on using the so-called legitimacy of the UN to gang up on their victim of the day.

I am sure that, given the corrupted pattern of allied third world regional voting blocks assisted more often than not by various EU members, this logical, fundamental, and significant change – which would do much to reclaim it's lost legitimacy - has little chance of passing a GA of SC vote. But it would bring the UN's current irrelevance into the light of day, for all to see.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (45) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Correction: Not "Don't Be Greedy!" but "Don't Get Greedy!" [2 words]Jonathan RickJan 5, 2005 08:3419427
Deconstruct Theocracy [91 words]Don van SickleApr 21, 2003 12:078494
difficulties ahead... [16 words]p cormanyApr 17, 2003 14:458427
Time to leave Saudi?? [69 words]Mark HMar 21, 2003 16:317497
Democracy at home - Tyranny Abroad [60 words]AhmedMar 14, 2003 15:037256
The theory of intended and unintended consequences [442 words]Shfep FargotsteinMar 12, 2003 12:177201
After Saddam? Remaking the Middle East [176 words]Wahid BoctorMar 3, 2003 00:527009
Keep up the fantastic work! [20 words]Dave PryceFeb 18, 2003 01:526707
Democracy? [25 words]HarmoniaFeb 17, 2003 10:216695
Playing the "Liberation" card [510 words]Dr. Ron PollandFeb 17, 2003 09:536694
Freedom of the Media IS necessary for Peace in the Middle East [250 words]Alex DashevskyFeb 16, 2003 14:046688
Not OK Oday [361 words]Chas. DahlinFeb 15, 2003 15:536674
Democracy is born out of maturity [213 words]Karsten BraschFeb 15, 2003 14:396672
3Problems in the US Policy [1260 words]Aslele ZaabiFeb 14, 2003 23:176658
False Dichotomy in Postwar Planning [409 words]Todd WinteringFeb 14, 2003 16:026648
Japan and the ME are like chalk and cheese [124 words]S.R.JudahFeb 14, 2003 08:156638
Beyond Technicality [107 words]A HFeb 13, 2003 19:266624
Japan [113 words]M SchultehenrichFeb 13, 2003 14:316618
Revamping the UN [354 words]Shep FargotsteinFeb 13, 2003 10:106610
How I see it at this time [106 words]Manuel GwiazdaFeb 13, 2003 08:306607
I'm with Ajami [96 words]Paul M. NevilleFeb 12, 2003 19:336598
Do we believe the Declaration? [164 words]Joseph SomselFeb 12, 2003 18:176595
Ready for Democracy [85 words]Ted VolckhausenFeb 12, 2003 15:056592
After Saddam - One Detail You Did Not Mention [333 words]Joseph E. RendiniFeb 12, 2003 14:176591
Notes [340 words]Alo KievalarFeb 12, 2003 11:376584
After Saddam: Islam Confronts Democracy [425 words]Dave DavisFeb 11, 2003 21:306573
Democracy vs. Imperialism [330 words]Arlinda DeAngelisFeb 11, 2003 21:266572
We'd have to be brutal with terrorists [192 words]Catherine FFeb 11, 2003 20:326571
America's Destiny [137 words]William L. KorstadFeb 11, 2003 19:526569
Democracy's Core Value [127 words]David JacobFeb 11, 2003 19:326567
Calling the Fouad Ajami Brigade [181 words]Andreas SamsonFeb 11, 2003 17:456565
To the above poster [49 words]JeffFeb 11, 2003 16:376564
Democracy and security are inseparable. [365 words]Quin RobertsFeb 11, 2003 15:566563
Give democracy a chance [233 words]Amir ZadehFeb 11, 2003 12:336556
Arabs already have disposable divorce [66 words]GloriaFeb 11, 2003 12:326555
Strongly disagree ! [225 words]R.IsakFeb 11, 2003 11:486553
Caution in the Middle East [625 words]James M. CarterFeb 11, 2003 11:356552
Forget About Reforming Iraq -- or the Arab World [311 words]Ralph WinstanleyFeb 11, 2003 11:086551
RE: Glenn Klotz's question [173 words]Bob SamualsFeb 11, 2003 10:586550
After Iraq [96 words]John HampeFeb 11, 2003 10:556549
Not trusting the US or the UK to take a long term view :response to Ajami's view [532 words]elaine bousfieldFeb 11, 2003 10:406548
Outstanding balanced article [107 words]John S. MorganFeb 11, 2003 10:396547
Can This Go On? [122 words]Steven HessFeb 11, 2003 10:216545
Liberals & Liberal democracy [108 words]Glenn KlotzFeb 11, 2003 09:476538
Famous Victory? [193 words]Graham Rael-BrookFeb 11, 2003 09:026537

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)