True Islam

Submitted by donvan (United States), Oct 23, 2006 at 11:36

True "Islam" like true "Marxism" is a delusion. Mohammedism is the terroristic genesis, the fantasy of some "True Islam" simply enables the terroristic tactic of the Mohammedians. It is Mohammed that is the example of behavior and the philosophy of forced collectiveism. There is no "Islam". This myth has wasted more energy and useless debate that any other ideology including the discedited Marxist model.

Mohammedism is a true Pandora's box. Once we open the Mohammedian box, out spewes the hate,subjugation, violence,and twisted ideology of submission to the forced collectivisation of the masses. When we parse the sects, customs, rituals,laws,and beliefs we are left with one conclusion, the more we seek understanding and tolerance, the more bold and violent and demanding the aggressive philosophy of Mohhammed presents itself. The war we are engaged in is a war with Mohammedism. We will not win against "Muslims" or "Islam", we can and must prevail against Mohammedism. Why do we treat this different that Marxism? Do they both not advocate hostility toward the US Constitution? Do they both not advocate for the replacement of the secular state, elimination of individual freedom,the practical enslavement of females, religious tolerance? Are our elites so enamored with Mohammedism that they are blinded by the reality of Mohammedism. There is no "Islamofacism", "Militant Islam", "Islamics", "Islamic Terrorists" There is Mohammedism, yet no one dare call it by its name.

The "Outrage" by advocates of Mohammed is feared. The cartoon fiasco was a pre-emtive strike. No one dare call this thing by its actual ideological name: Mohammedism. The term renders moot the religious aspects,defines the ideology and enables the identification of the individual responsible for the genesis of the ideology, and provides a reference for the behavior of violence and terrorism which comes from the person of Mohammed's example.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".