69 million page views

Australia

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Australia's Muslim Problem

Submitted by denis (United States), Jul 20, 2008 at 15:46

Quadrant Magazine Australia September 2006 - Volume L Number 9

Back to contents...

The Muslim Problem and What to Do about It
John Stone

WHEN I WAS ASKED to give this talk, I hesitated before accepting. I have written previously about Australia's Muslim problem—principally on the opinion page of the Australian, and also, at greater and hence more considered length, in the quarterly National Observer last October—and have been the subject of assorted abuse for doing so. While I wear most of that as a badge of honour, I have also been described (not by name, but collectively) as a "fool" by Andrew Bolt, a columnist whose views I generally respect.

Greg Sheridan, whose foreign policy views I usually hold in high regard, described some much more limited remarks on this topic by Peter Costello earlier this year as "cheap, lazy, nasty populism", "foolish", "lazy, incendiary" and "idle rhetoric" that "demonises Islam". Since Costello's comments were a mere trifle comparatively, I hesitate to imagine Sheridan's opinion of my own views.

The reason that I risk even more such opprobrium is that, despite the ever-mounting level of evidence, there appears to be very little recognition at the national political level in Australia of the clear and present danger confronting us.

In attempting to restate that danger, it would be easy to focus on the crimes which, over recent years, have emanated from Australia's Muslims. Two and a half years ago, former detective Tim Priest spoke to a Quadrant dinner about his concerns in that regard (see Quadrant, January-February 2004). Since then we have seen, among many other such developments, the revelations over the gang-raping of "white Aussie sluts" by young Muslim men of Pakistani origin; the increasing Muslim lawlessness in south-western Sydney; and the concerted raids on some eastern suburbs by car-load convoys of young Muslim men "responding", so they said, to the Cronulla riot of December 11, 2005. Incidentally, while I do not condone that riot, it is worth remembering that it was clearly provoked by the mounting anger over the behaviour of similar young Muslim men at Cronulla and other beaches for some years previously.

It would be easy to point to such specific acts of lawlessness, and to the ineffectual reactions of those responsible for law and order in New South Wales—including, now, a premier whose own electorate centres on Lakemba and whose party is responsible for the continued presence here of one of our foremost Muslim troublemakers, the Imam of the Lakemba mosque, Sheikh Al-Hilali. It would also be easy to point out that there has still not been a significant prosecution of the Muslims involved in those December raids.

It would be easy—and it would largely miss the point. It would do so because the point does not reside in these individual criminal or otherwise offensive incidents, such as the presence of violently anti-Western literature in assorted Muslim bookshops. If we focus only on such matters, the responses of our politicians will consist on the one hand of such things as enhanced policing, sterner anti-sedition laws, more expenditure on ASIO and the Australian Federal Police, and so on. On the other hand, we shall see their further attempts to "embrace" the Muslim community while arguing that, just like former immigrant groups in postwar Australia, in due course it too will meld into our great national "diversity". Even the Prime Minister has not been guiltless of this form of cultural appeasement.

Meanwhile, the Islamic cancer in our body politic not only remains untouched, but continues to grow—stealthily, unobtrusively, even unknown to many Australians busy about their daily lives. One day, however, we shall experience a terrible national pain—awakening, for example, to the equivalent of the London bombings of July last year, or the French riots of last October; and we shall ask ourselves, "How did it come to this?"

It will come to this because of a failure to focus upon the real problem, as distinct from those serious, but nevertheless superficial manifestations of it of which, a moment ago, I was saying it would be easy to speak. It will come, in other words, from focusing on symptoms, rather than causes.

It will also come to this because, as usual in our democracy, few elected politicians, even if they recognise that problem's headlight coming down the track, want to rush forward and derail it before it can overrun what may, after all, be their successors rather than themselves.

Another reason why it will come to this derives from a growing fear of speaking out in the face of the violence potentially levelled against those who do. As the Mafia has always understood, violence is a force multiplier. When almost all Australia's newspapers earlier this year decided not to inform their readers about those admittedly offensive Danish cartoons (Brisbane's Courier Mail was, I think, the only significant honourable exception), they paraded as a virtue their desire not to "gratuitously offend" Australian Muslims. They were backed up in doing so, naturally, by almost all our politicians. I too abhor giving gratuitous offence; but even more do I abhor self-censorship, particularly when that self-censorship derives at least in part from fear of the fatwa.

So while of course I welcome measures to deal with those superficial manifestations of our Muslim problem, it is vital to understand that the problem goes much, much deeper than that. It is indeed a problem not singular to Australia. It is a problem that is similar to the Muslim problem in all Western countries where a significant immigrant Muslim minority has been allowed to become established. The only difference in Australia is that, because of our national advantages of distance from major population centres (Indonesia apart) and the oceans that surround us, that minority has not yet grown to the "critical mass" proportions it has already reached in many other Western countries. But instead of capitalising on that advantage, we are complacently allowing it to slip away from us as our Muslim proportion increases under the twin influences of continued Muslim immigration and a much higher than average birth-rate.

ANYONE WITH EVEN a passing knowledge of what has been happening for years now in Western and Central Europe must surely have begun to see the nature of the writing on those countries' walls. The Netherlands, France, Denmark, Spain in particular, and many others have all seen the Trojan horses of Muslim immigration, legal and illegal, pushed further and further within their border walls. Four of the Netherlands' major cities—Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht—today have Muslim majorities in the under-fourteen- year-old age group. Britain has already been the target of one successful Muslim atrocity and a number of unsuccessful ones. On March 11, 2004, the Madrid train bombings killed 191 people and injured hundreds of others. Last year's riots in France have already been mentioned.

Confronted with these and other outrages, some European politicians are belatedly beginning to act. The Dutch now require all aspiring (legal) immigrants to undertake and pass a number of tests, including proficiency in the Dutch language and acceptance of aspects of Dutch society (homosexuality, for example) that are antithetical to Islam. The French are reported to be in the process of instituting new immigration laws. The Austrian Minister for the Interior recently said that 45 per cent of Austria's Muslim immigrants "cannot be integrated", and urged them to "choose another country" to reside. The Spanish authorities have made successive attempts to control the flood of illegal African Muslim immigrants—first from Morocco across the Straits of Gibraltar, then from Mauritania and Senegal to Spain's Canary Islands. The influx continues, nevertheless, to mount: on May 18, some 656 people landed in the Canaries. As one Madrid observer has said, this "mass assault on Spain's African border may just be a first warning of what to expect of the future".

The Blair government in Britain, meanwhile, has effectively lost control not only of its borders, but also of its deportation procedures even when the illegals (not all of them Muslims) are apprehended. And the major parties there wonder why the truly right-wing British National Party is rapidly gaining adherents!

Even the Eurocrats in Brussels are now belatedly admitting that something has to be done. According to the Australian's Paul Kelly, recently touring Europe, the European Union's Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security told him in the course of an interview:

"We cannot accept people entering Europe, working in Europe and refusing to accept our values, the equality of men and women, and full respect for human dignity. We cannot accept, in the name of different religions, people violating equality between men and women.
"There is a growing awareness that the only way to preserve our identity, culture and history, and guarantee the possibility of foreigners coming here, is by setting up a basic framework of rights and values.
"The models in Europe have failed. The multicultural [model] has failed. The model of forced integration has also failed. In France, you see young people using violence to reaffirm their Muslim identity …"

Kelly's article suggested that some glimmer of reality was breaking through to a journalist not previously noted for that on these issues.

We need to understand that the core of the Muslim problem—for the world, not merely for Australia—lies in the essence of Islam itself. It is the problem of a culture that, for the past 500 years or so at least, has failed its adherents as its inward-looking theocracy has resulted in it falling further and further behind the West. It is that sense of cultural failure, that sense of smouldering resentment that fuels the fires so busily stoked by the more extremist Muslim teachers. Fiercely exclusive rather than inclusive, Islam holds that church and state are inseparable; that women, while respected so long as they stick to their appointed place in the Islamic scheme of things, are less than equal to men generally; and that even the most extreme violence is justifiable when applied in pursuit of approved Islamic ends. Until all that changes—and it can only be changed from within Islam itself, if indeed it can be changed at all—the Islamic culture will never reside in harmony with others.

This is where all those comfortable (one might even call them "lazy") assumptions about our own Muslim community break down. Contrary to those assumptions, I do not believe that this latest body of newcomers amongst us will emulate the examples of their predecessors from Italy, Greece, Poland, the Baltic states, or more recently Vietnam, Hong Kong and China. How can it be possible for them to become part of a united Australia, when any Muslim woman who wishes to "marry out" risks not merely social and familial ostracism, but outright violence, even death by way of "honour killings", by her father or her brothers? Almost without exception, the only marriages occurring in Australia today between Muslims and non-Muslims involve conversion to Islam of the latter.

The high priests and priestesses of multiculturalism should not be surprised by this. It is after all a product—admittedly, an extreme one—of policies they have been espousing with such religious zeal for thirty years or more.

This reality of separateness, however, does not stop at the marriage line. While individual ethnic communities throughout our postwar history have always tended to cluster together at first, gradually they have dispersed. My very nice next-door neighbours are Chinese, as are two other families down the street who, together with an Assyrian family, make up our own little example of that "diversity" of which our politicians so blandly prate.

So far as I can see, however, Muslims do not so much move out, as move in. In communities where large numbers of Muslims gather, non-Muslims are gradually driven out. It is then not long before there are established "no go" areas where, as Tim Priest reminded us, Muslim gangs flourish on the proceeds of drugs, extortion, armed robbery and so on.

In turn, as the host country's own laws are set aside in these "no go" areas, there develop demands for the recognition of these areas as small "states within the state", to be governed by sharia law, administered not by national courts but by sharia-type "courts" overseen by local imams. In France, we have begun to see the ultimate expression of such developments. There, a public official is reported to have agreed to meet an imam outside the predominantly Muslim district of Roubaix, which, according to the imam, was Islamic territory and closed to non-Muslims. Similar demands can already be heard in Britain. To a more limited extent (so far), we have begun to hear them in Australia.

Alex Alexiev, of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, interviewed by Alan Jones on 2GB in June last year, reported the extensive Islamisation of schools in Muslim ghettoes in France. As he says on his website:

"Having by and large completed their takeover of the Muslim ghettoes, often by "targeted violence" against non-Muslims and moderate Muslims alike, and turned them into "anti-societies", the Islamist fanatics are making great progress towards achieving control of the educational system as well. As usual, girls are the first victims … The punishment for refusal to conform is often physical violence ...
"This new generation of Muslim children, born and raised in Europe, is growing up already indoctrinated to consider themselves part of a ‘Muslim nation' separate and opposed to everything Western civilisation stands for."

Are we so stupid, or so lazy, or so frightened of being criticised for political incorrectness, that we are unable to recognise such developments?—and more importantly, to demand policies to stymie them?

One principal response to arguments of this kind has been to seek to distinguish between "moderate" Islam and "extremist" or "fundamentalist" Islam. It is said that, while we have to deal with the latter, in doing so we must be careful not to discriminate against, or "marginalise", the former. The fact that the Mafia has its origins and practices in Sicily, or the Cosa Nostra in Calabria, does not mean that we regard all Sicilians, or all Calabrians, as actual or potential criminals, and the same should go for Australia's Muslims.

Yet while that last proposition is undoubtedly correct, the analogy involved is also instructive. The question we should ask ourselves is this: what distinguishes the actions, and the power, of the Mafia from the actions, and the power, of Muslim fundamentalists?

The answer, I suggest, is that at no time has the Mafia had behind it (a few aberrant individual priests notwithstanding) the power, and the blessing, of the Church of Rome. And while, a century ago, it was still the case that members of that church (such as my maternal grandfather) who "married out" to a Protestant (such as my maternal grandmother) risked excommunication and the later denial of the last sacraments (as in his case), even then there was no suggestion that such apostasy should result in a death sentence. Nor is there any suggestion that Catholics, even in Rome itself, should not be subject to the same laws and the same courts as non-Catholics; still less that those laws and those courts should be administered by the spiritual power rather than the temporal one.

Academics, and timid politicians seeking excuses for their inactivity in addressing the Muslim problem, may therefore continue to dance on the points of philosophical needles about those supposed differences between "moderate" Islam and "extremist" Islam. And it is true that it often seems as though there are as many hostilities between different Islamic sects—the Shia and the Sunnis, to name only the most topical example—as there are between Islam and non-Islam. Nevertheless, as Father Paul Stenhouse has reminded us in a typically scholarly but also extremely pointed article in the March issue of Quadrant, all followers of Islam, "moderate" or otherwise, divide the world into two areas: the Dar al-Islam and the Dar al-Harb. The former, the house of submission, is that part of the world where Islamic governments and Islamic law prevail: the latter, the house of war, is the rest of the world. Australia, to all Muslims, is part of the house of war.

In May this year Quadrant printed a thoughtful paper by Cardinal George Pell arising from his recent study of the Koran. He distils a clear distinction between the revelations Mohammed claimed to receive (via the Archangel Gabriel) while in Mecca, and those which followed his later move to Medina. During the former period he was "without military power" and was still seeking to convert the non-believers by way of proselytising. During the latter period, proselytising had given way to the ravages of the sword. In Pell's words, "the spread of Islam through conquest and conversion began".

Cardinal Pell notes that those passages from the Koran that are often quoted by those seeking to show the "moderate" nature of Islam are all drawn from the earlier period, whereas the Koran of Medina is replete with the most blood-curdling injunctions to kill all infidels wherever they are found. As Pell notes, just as in our own legal system a later law overrides any earlier one to the extent of any inconsistency between them, so it may not be unreasonable to assume that the Koran of Medina overrides the Koran of Mecca where any inconsistencies are concerned. That is indeed the view taken by the scholars of fundamentalist Islam.

There is another point relevant to this debate about "moderate" versus "extreme" Islam—namely, the Islamic doctrine of taqiyya. This has been the subject of two most interesting articles in National Observer in 2005 by Andrew Campbell. Without going into detail, taqiyya is the doctrine whereby any lies, deceit, or other forms of treachery may be justified in the cause of defeating the infidel. It is "a cloak for the believer" that provides a religious dispensation for such things as "friendship with unbelievers" and other subterfuges "in defending oneself from one's enemies". I suggest that, when one reads the soothing words of our own Islamic "moderates", the doctrine of taqqiya should never be far from our minds.

It is clear that, in Muslim countries throughout the world, the forces of extremism are winning the battle within Islam. (Of course, the usual apologists would undoubtedly argue that that is all our fault because of such things as our support for the continued existence of Israel, or the US-led coalition's invasion of Iraq; but let that pass.) In many Muslim countries, such as Egypt, those forces today are held back and driven underground by the present regime's security apparatus; but then, the same was true of the Shah's Iran until 1979.

Had I been asked ten years ago to name a Muslim country where the mullahs had been put in their place, and where a clear line had been drawn between the mosque and the state, I would have said that Turkey probably fitted that description—a result of the leadership of the great Kemal Ataturk eighty years or so ago. Today, the best thing I can say about Turkey is that, while one must still suspend judgment, the mullahs there are winning. We have, for the first time in this still constitutionally secular nation, an Islamic party in government. True, it is a government which is still hoping for Turkey's admission to the European Union, and which has therefore been (for the time being at least) moderating its Islamic tendencies accordingly. When, as I predict will be the case, Turkey's application is finally rejected, or fails, after long delays, to be acted upon, things will be different.

There are those (Greg Sheridan is among them) who argue that, whatever may have been the case ten years ago, Indonesia today is genuinely a democracy, and one where "moderate" Islam is in the ascendancy, Jemah Islamiya and all that notwithstanding. We had better hope—and I do hope—that they are right, but I am bound to say that I do not find the evidence compelling.

There is no time to argue this important matter in detail, so I shall simply state a few points:

• After a nationalist dictatorship (Sukarno), an oligarchic kleptocracy (Suharto), and three ineffectual short-term successors, may it not be a bit of a stretch to portray the short reign of President Yudhoyono—great improvement though he undoubtedly seems to be—as the embodiment of the democratic virtues? Are we not in some danger of confusing "democracy" with mere universal suffrage?

• How can we meaningfully describe as a "democracy" a nation which refuses to proscribe a body (Jemah Islamiya) that is not merely widely identified throughout the world as a terrorist organisation, but whose adherents have also been guilty of major terrorist attacks within Indonesia itself?

• If "moderate" is to describe a country in which Christians are openly discriminated against, persecuted, threatened and even killed, how much further do these "moderates" have to go before their apologists in Australia will cease describing them as such?

• As a recent Jakarta Post editorial has noted, sharia law is steadily gaining a wider foothold in Indonesia notwithstanding that country's formally secular and pluralist Constitution. The province of Aceh is now "under a sharia regime, and today more than 20 regencies and municipalities across Indonesia proclaim themselves to be ruled by sharia or have introduced sharia-inspired legislation".

• Have we forgotten that, in the wake of the Bali bombings of October 12, 2002, when eighty-eight Australians were killed and many others injured (not to mention all those of other nationalities, including the Balinese, who suffered similar fates), a reputable opinion poll in Indonesia recorded that some 16 per cent of Indonesian Muslims (almost 30 million people) supported those bombings, while a further 25 per cent declined to proffer an opinion? More recently, the highly regarded Pew Research Group, in its Pew Global Attitudes Project, showed a reduction in that 16 per cent figure to "only" 10 per cent (18 million people).

• The same survey showed, however, that 65 per cent of Indonesia's Muslims today do not believe that the September 11 attacks on the United States were carried out by Arabs!

• Did nobody else notice the rapturous reception given recently to the Mad Iranian Bomber, President Ahmedinajad, when he visited Indonesia to attend a conference of non-Arab Muslim leaders? At a joint press conference with President Yudhoyono, this major threat to world peace and stability raved on for thirty minutes, denouncing the West's well-justified distrust of his nuclear program and predicting that Israel will "be destroyed". Politeness to one's guest is of course important, but I cannot help feeling that at some point President Yudhoyono might have intervened to divert this rabid flow. What does the fact that he didn't, tell us about the nature of Islam in Indonesia's "democracy" today?

I hope that Greg Sheridan and those who think like him about Indonesia are right. While we are in the process of finding out, we should do everything reasonable to maintain good relations with our important near neighbour. I do however suggest that, in the defence of our own borders and in other ways, we would be wise to avoid becoming too reliant on Indonesia's goodwill and co-operation. As the record has consistently shown, those attitudes can change overnight.

More generally, and while I am open to correction, I believe the evidence is incontrovertible that Islamic and Western cultures are today, within any single polity, incompatible. Certainly, I know of no example that can be cited to the contrary.

If a thesis along these lines be accepted, what is to be done about Australia's existing, and rapidly growing, Muslim community? I do not wish simply to repeat now what I have already said elsewhere. Let me begin, though, with a few basic propositions:

• Most basically of all, we don't even know how many Muslims there are in Australia, and that is unacceptable. The religious affiliation question in the forthcoming census should be made compulsory. Arguments to the contrary by so-called civil libertarians and others are at best hollow and at worst deliberately deceitful. One such argument in particular, namely that if the question were compulsory, Muslim residents would simply answer it untruthfully and we would therefore be no better informed than at present, is hardly a character reference.

• Australia's Muslims can be divided into four categories: those born here; those not born here but who, since arrival, have become naturalised Australian citizens; those Muslim immigrants who are not yet citizens; and those here illegally. For present purposes, in what follows I set aside the first two categories and focus on the latter two.

• There is an old adage that, when you are already in a hole, stop digging. The entry into Australia of Muslim immigrants over the past thirty-five years or so means that we are now in a hole. The first thing to do, then, is to stop digging. We should curtail very sharply, to the point of virtually halting, the further entry of Muslims within our immigration programs. That will be attacked as "discriminatory", and so it is. We have every right to discriminate against the admission to Australia of people of any culture that we believe will be incompatible with the peace, order and good government of our country.

• The second thing we need to do, and one which is entirely non-discriminatory, is to make it significantly harder for people to become Australian citizens. At present, citizenship involves only two years' permanent residence and "swearing" (quite possibly with one's fingers crossed, or with that doctrine of taqiyya very much in mind) an oath or affirmation of allegiance. After you have gone through that essentially worthless procedure, you can go back to your cultural ghetto, be appointed to jobs in the public service, the police or even the armed forces, and if you are subsequently found to have committed an offence, it is no longer possible to deport you. This is patently ridiculous. The present two-year residential requirement should be extended to at least five years. Equally importantly, people seeking citizenship should be required to demonstrate their capacity to be citizens by at least acquiring reasonable proficiency in (and being officially tested on their command of) English, as well as having to demonstrate their knowledge and acceptance of certain other fundamentals of citizenship in Australia.

• The third thing we should do is to make it much harder to come into Australia illegally. John Howard has already done a good deal in that regard, in the teeth of opposition from a small number of malcontents within his own party, but more is needed. I proposed last August that the government should move to block access to Australia through our back door across Torres Strait. If that (non-discriminatory) measure had been taken, the forty-three West Papuans who have been the source of so much trouble recently would never have got here; indeed, they would probably never have set out to do so.

If we focus on those three objectives, namely setting out to virtually halt legal Muslim immigration, rendering citizenship much tougher to obtain (not only for Muslims) and cracking down even harder on illegal entry of both Muslims and non-Muslims, there are many things we can and should do. Here are a few of them:

• One wholly non-discriminatory measure which could, however, have the result of deterring Muslim applications for admission to our immigration stream would be to require all applicants to receive, accept the contents of, and sign for, a formal governmental statement of those aspects of our national life to which we expect all newcomers to conform. This would include such things as the separation of church and state; the equal treatment of men and women; the unacceptability of certain cultural practices, such as polygamy, female genital mutilation and the like; the full rights of women to marry those of any faith (or none); the rule of law more generally; and so on.

• There are also currently several aspects of our immigration law and procedures that are badly in need of change. One such derives from our accession to the UN International Convention on Refugees, an outdated convention drawn up originally to deal with the postwar refugee situation that bears no relation to that of today. Under our Refugee and Special Humanitarian immigration programs we are currently taking roughly 13,000 persons (including about 6000 refugees) per annum—whereas Japan, which also became a signatory to the UN Convention in 1982, and which has a population many times larger than our own, has since taken no more than ten to fifteen refugees per year. What is worse, however, is that it appears that who we take in as refugees is largely determined not by us, but by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. What was that about "we will determine who comes to this country, and how they come"?

Presumably it is because of this inexplicable abrogation of our national sovereignty that we have recently seen literally thousands of Sudanese, Somalis and other wholly culturally incompatible people (many of whom are presumably also Muslims) being dumped into places like Toowoomba, Ballarat and elsewhere. (The alternative, that our Minister for Immigration and her Department actually chose them themselves, is too appalling to contemplate.) Most of these people are unable to speak a word of English and a high proportion of them have not even been subjected to proper medical checks.

We should, without further delay, give notice of our intention to withdraw from this UN Convention (twelve months' notice is required). That does not mean that we should stop taking in refugees, although I think that their numbers should be reduced. It does mean that we should choose who they are.

• There should be an immediate major reform and reshaping of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs:

(1) Formally recognise that this Department is now as integral to our national security as the Defence Department, ASIO and the armed forces, and begin to staff it accordingly, including with respect to security checks.

(2) Change its name to the Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.

(3) Get rid of its present incompetent (or worse) minister, and put the portfolio in the hands of someone who can be trusted to run it (rather than be run by its senior bureaucrats) along the lines required by (1).

(4) Jettison all its current programs of official multiculturalism. As that European Union Commissioner said to Paul Kelly, "the multicultural model has failed".

(5) Suspend, subject to (7) below, all those programs currently being run by the department that effectively provide "back door" means of entry into Australia, and subsequent access to permanent residence, by people who would fail to pass even the existing (inadequate) tests applied under the formal immigration program. For example, the Labor Party has begun protesting recently about the scandals being wrought in this area under the so-called "skilled worker" arrangements. It is true that these protests derive from trade union dislike of labour market competition. Nevertheless, in terms of protecting the integrity of our immigration policies, these programs are a disgrace to all concerned—the Department of Immigration that devised them, the minister who approved them, the employers who connive in them, and the immigration agents who work the rackets under them.

(6) Immigration procedures are far too important to be left in the hands of private persons who have no interest in the nation's welfare and who may even, in some cases, have quite contrary motivations. The licences of private immigration agents should be revoked, with appropriate compensation paid for loss of profit.

(7) For these and other purposes, the Prime Minister should institute a thoroughgoing investigation of the present workings of the department, with terms of reference directed to major reforms along the foregoing lines.

Do I think that any of these suggestions will find acceptance by any of our major political parties? I do not know, although so long as Mr Howard remains prime minister, and if he can be persuaded to stay home and focus on issues of real importance to Australians, there is possibly a chance of his government doing so.

What I do believe is that public anger on these matters is growing. If our existing political parties will not address the concerns responsible for that anger, then a new party will surely arise to fill the vacuum. Call it, notionally, the No More Muslims Party. I don't look forward to its appearance, but appear it will unless the causes that will otherwise give rise to it are addressed—and quickly. Too much time has been lost already.

John Stone gave this talk at a recent Quadrant dinner in Sydney.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (2094) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Sweden and Swedes [3 words]danneAug 4, 2020 01:39259823
13Sweden is hell [59 words]FabianoFeb 10, 2018 13:08242167
8Rotherham Syndrome [38 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
DonSep 19, 2014 18:32218052
1Londonistan [67 words]MuslimkSep 21, 2014 12:07218052
2Rotherham Syndrome [90 words]DonSep 23, 2014 14:02218052
4CORRUPTION BY SECULARISM MAKES THE WEST VULNERABLE TO ISLAMIC INFILTRATION [227 words]Nur el Masih ben HaqSep 16, 2014 13:17217940
5The British (and others) Are Wimps [81 words]DaveSep 14, 2014 16:40217877
21Stop [28 words]doolJan 21, 2011 04:51181933
26A SANE MAN [60 words]REBECCAFeb 25, 2011 02:02181933
6Hammertime [18 words]dudeMay 7, 2011 13:22181933
4RULE OF RECIPROCITY [159 words]AGNIJul 26, 2011 11:20181933
10The reason Islamophobia is rampant... [271 words]TuppDec 16, 2011 15:44181933
14Islamophobia is rampant because of legitmate fear of Muslims! [151 words]saraDec 16, 2011 18:59181933
4Crime, pedophilia, physical abuse, massacres, serial murders = U.S.A.!!! [45 words]truthsayerFeb 29, 2012 14:14181933
The u.s. [66 words]fact checkerOct 13, 2014 03:53181933
2thank you for writing this piece [58 words]Rachel SorrentoNov 23, 2010 08:40180406
43Denmark is Racist [182 words]naderAug 21, 2010 06:21177041
26Facts versus Fiction [186 words]American WisdomSep 26, 2010 22:35177041
10AMERICAN IGORANCE [85 words]nateSep 28, 2010 20:08177041
15Typical leftist response [260 words]American WisdomOct 4, 2010 16:47177041
1What [9 words]Johannes PungbråckOct 19, 2010 10:51177041
2Americans have at least chance to educate themselves. [60 words]Ravi RanjanNov 1, 2010 07:02177041
humanity verses jihad [11 words]Ravi RanjanNov 1, 2010 07:14177041
12why they live on Danish charity? [71 words]RaviNov 1, 2010 07:59177041
2Jihadists [125 words]YunisDec 17, 2010 23:41177041
5assumptions based on myth based on assumptions [359 words]RaviDec 19, 2010 01:54177041
5racism=bad [99 words]YunisDec 22, 2010 14:05177041
1let us be free & fair in thinking [9 words]RaviDec 27, 2010 02:59177041
2westerners are bad as if you did not figure that out already [92 words]YunisDec 27, 2010 15:57177041
thanks, for at least listening [170 words]RaviDec 30, 2010 07:41177041
2American Wisdumb [42 words]CassandraFeb 22, 2011 13:19177041
7CANADIAN [89 words]swedeFeb 25, 2011 02:00177041
2take it easy swede [171 words]canadian nateFeb 25, 2011 20:47177041
3Bringing the word of truth [46 words]truthguyApr 26, 2011 15:36177041
2Be nice and smart! [33 words]TuppDec 16, 2011 15:47177041
1A Question??? [32 words]The DaneFeb 15, 2012 18:34177041
14Racist Denmark [136 words]RaySep 1, 2012 00:58177041
11Denmark is the most racist country I know [225 words]Sara Bermejo (Spain)Feb 21, 2013 02:56177041
Sucess [8 words]CarlosNov 3, 2013 18:34177041
2Feel free to live if we dont live up to your expectations . [87 words]Stavros DakosFeb 15, 2014 22:47177041
You are right. Thank you Sara [59 words]smiSep 7, 2014 12:57177041
No chance of your kind being the good people [113 words]BardSep 25, 2014 09:41177041
27Living In Sweden [143 words]In SwedenAug 18, 2010 13:34176900
7What a load ... [41 words]JoachimOct 18, 2010 14:42176900
3Spoiled?? [113 words]in SwedenOct 23, 2010 08:13176900
7What's surprising about this? Sweden is an atheist country [103 words]theOneWithoutASecondMar 7, 2011 15:29176900
2stop complaining [156 words]EdenMay 9, 2011 13:25176900
1wrong! [128 words]EdenMay 9, 2011 13:36176900
6Pigeon Languages [294 words]RobertAug 8, 2011 04:26176900
1seriously? [46 words]Muhammed A.Oct 1, 2012 11:17176900
2You base this on...? [239 words]someoneDec 8, 2012 09:58176900
3I know what I am talking about [103 words]SeamusDec 14, 2012 14:34176900
Overreacting? [49 words]klenoxJun 2, 2010 03:37173715
16Living in Sweden [181 words]Expat UKJun 7, 2010 19:35173715
1huh? [29 words]MathiasJun 11, 2010 18:26173715
6The USA is the Most PERFECT union on the face of the EARTH [24 words]Jim in Iowa,. USA and PROUD of itJul 10, 2010 19:15173715
2Atheism [16 words]Concerned awesome dudeJan 19, 2010 06:42167532
4It is something rotten in the entire world not just in Denmark [48 words]simonNov 28, 2009 08:56165157
2I'm Worried [140 words]SoniaDec 19, 2009 11:25165157
4Something Rotten in Denmark: $30,000 bounty [66 words]Mrs. SmithSep 12, 2009 10:54161435
12Preserving Western Civilization [117 words]J DSep 6, 2009 14:24161145
4Preserving western civilisation [91 words]Give us PeaceJan 3, 2010 21:44161145
1Well said! [20 words]AngelMar 15, 2010 16:56161145
3I Find it Strange [184 words]JustinApr 20, 2010 22:19161145
Wilderness [92 words]Vanu VaskorMay 29, 2010 13:59161145
2I agree [83 words]AlexJun 20, 2010 12:23161145
5True but otherway round [25 words]fedressSep 15, 2010 05:28161145
2Interesting comment [98 words]YunisDec 18, 2010 12:59161145
4Australia - stolen land [142 words]YunisDec 18, 2010 13:08161145
7Yunis knows nothing [77 words]TedDec 19, 2010 01:44161145
To your reader Yunis [37 words]TedDec 19, 2010 01:50161145
4Shocked! [263 words]A.K.AApr 11, 2009 22:18153756
6Of course denmark is a racist society [172 words]numanAug 26, 2009 17:48153756
1Typical immigrants [70 words]ThorNov 1, 2009 10:12153756
1DENMARK NEEDS TO INTEGRATE MORE [169 words]K RICHARDJan 3, 2010 12:53153756
2RE: DENMARK NEEDS TO INTEGRATE MORE [503 words]Birger SkruddusvingenJan 21, 2010 19:19153756
2Obligations of the Guest toward the Host [183 words]spare meMar 3, 2010 13:39153756
1Opinion about your comment [102 words]YunisDec 17, 2010 23:07153756
3what ? [66 words]kunvar khannaJan 29, 2011 05:24153756
Same stuff different area all together [369 words]Amazed yet notDec 5, 2011 00:55153756
2If there is a moderate Islam, it is time to speak up [336 words]Peter WaldoNov 30, 2008 09:20144156
5WHITES ARE PLAIN RACIST [39 words]islam khanDec 17, 2008 23:17144156
2Islam - Something is Rotten in Denmark [34 words]GneausApr 6, 2009 17:21144156
AGREED [27 words]a nony mouseMay 19, 2009 15:06144156
6Sadly, there cannot be a moderate Islam. [218 words]João Paulo Fernandes PontesJul 5, 2009 13:08144156
3re Whites are plain racist [63 words]AndersOct 8, 2009 19:23144156
8whites are plain racist? [229 words]kafurFeb 4, 2010 05:31144156
4What are you talking about? [71 words]HansMar 1, 2010 07:09144156
2Your interpretation is wrong [80 words]Khalid KhanMar 31, 2010 04:00144156
2white people are not racists [48 words]ann varelaSep 2, 2010 19:42144156
2Great but unIslamic [108 words]RaviNov 1, 2010 05:54144156
2Only, quest for truth will land you to believe the truth [171 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiNov 1, 2010 06:49144156
it search for modrate Aids [20 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiJan 5, 2011 15:10144156
1Sheffield culture [181 words]Braeg HeneffeNov 17, 2008 11:45143064
4American opinion of Denmark [179 words]Jared YoungMar 25, 2009 03:26143064
1No way back for Denmark [174 words]newmanOct 11, 2009 06:01143064
2A simple matter [597 words]DaneOct 18, 2009 15:10143064
1REMEMBER! [137 words]SimonJul 24, 2010 19:09143064
1judge the people individually [4 words]BehrouzSep 29, 2010 08:10143064
1Typical [249 words]lpMar 21, 2011 09:50143064
1listen... [116 words]JessieDec 19, 2013 11:06143064
Banned moslems? [36 words]human beingApr 11, 2008 16:57125377
10Australia's Muslim Problem [134 words]LeoneApr 5, 2008 08:55124728
2the disease of racism [132 words]truthJul 4, 2008 20:37124728
1Australia [5451 words]denisJul 20, 2008 15:46124728
re:australia's muslim problem by Leone [13 words]lindaApr 29, 2009 07:40124728
seriously.... [51 words]leilaMay 4, 2009 20:59124728
Reply to Truthseeker [136 words]SapphireMay 27, 2009 02:22124728
what? [9 words]The BossDec 8, 2013 19:27124728
1The writing is on the wall ! [233 words]dfwhite19438Mar 13, 2008 02:31122535
3Send the Muslims Home [119 words]christianMar 18, 2008 20:11122535
Stupidity is a bad thing [183 words]MimsMar 21, 2008 16:50122535
2not stupid [92 words]christianMar 24, 2008 11:58122535
2Knowledge--in answer to your question [581 words]LaelaApr 29, 2008 22:28122535
something rotten again [102 words]tiredMay 1, 2008 17:59122535
Shame [39 words]KhaleeqMay 31, 2008 18:51122535
1HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT AGAINST ISLAM [76 words]Chaudary Saad Ahmed NasirJun 27, 2008 10:49122535
TRY the BIBLE [81 words]AliceJul 9, 2008 21:45122535
Looking out is good, disparity is not... [306 words]Hari SrinivasanAug 12, 2008 22:24122535
common sense [257 words]dfwhite19438Aug 13, 2008 18:59122535
it is ...spreading throughout the world [96 words]amitAug 28, 2008 04:06122535
1Re: Send the Muslims Home [69 words]Isaac DearnaleySep 17, 2008 23:51122535
yes it is [134 words]christianSep 19, 2008 14:41122535
2Islam Kills [242 words]Ban Islamo-FascismSep 27, 2008 20:14122535
2Reply to: Send the Muslims Home [121 words]AnalystJan 30, 2009 16:41122535
Reply to part of Khaleeq comment [45 words]BenApr 21, 2009 09:39122535
Thank You for your counter comment. [32 words]Asoka MauryanOct 2, 2009 11:30122535
muslims [35 words]mrs. jonesNov 13, 2009 22:17122535
RE: Stupidity is a bad thing [506 words]Mysil BergsprekkenJan 22, 2010 11:35122535
Amen [10 words]Ronnie PaulasJun 20, 2010 13:14122535
Two can Never meet [70 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiNov 1, 2010 07:11122535
I say what I want! [22 words]EdenMay 9, 2011 13:28122535
again [184 words]AmazedDec 5, 2011 02:21122535
vision clear, communication a little blurred [322 words]remainingconfidentialMay 25, 2013 15:36122535
1Muslims [123 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
RoyFeb 1, 2016 10:29122535
Daniel Pipes' "solution" doesn't address any of the problems he mentions [104 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael S.Mar 13, 2016 06:28122535
Goodbye to Danes and flatulence [81 words]sshJan 12, 2008 20:53118053
Supper's on the Table -- for the birds? [707 words]Michael SMar 19, 2016 20:38118053
A proper discussion requires the proper facts... [139 words]MarcoJan 7, 2008 15:43117671
Symbol of Islamist-left alliance [40 words]VijayNov 12, 2007 17:40113613
1disrespect is the name of this game [60 words]Phil GreendJul 1, 2007 01:53102089
DISRESPECT IS THE NAME OF THE GAME [277 words]Paramasvaran KandiahJul 27, 2007 08:13102089
Moshe: Perspective? [1520 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanDec 5, 2006 22:0068431
Sword [43 words]Bombs of Israel and Babies of QanaDec 14, 2006 07:4168431
assimilate [83 words]RevertNov 28, 2006 18:2467627
when in rome [161 words]jeroen van der mierDec 22, 2007 17:3367627
The future [301 words]jeroen van der mierDec 28, 2007 20:4867627
1muslims must be left to be [165 words]hamidNov 3, 2008 04:0867627
1or else what? [165 words]jeroen van der mierNov 22, 2008 11:4567627
Just found this site [255 words]SchwabenSep 29, 2006 14:4558218
2ASSIMILATE OR LEAVE [147 words]VeraOct 12, 2006 23:4158218
a cancer consuming humanity [85 words]l. kellegOct 22, 2006 13:5858218
True Islam [299 words]donvanOct 23, 2006 11:3658218
100% agree [79 words]dfwhiteOct 23, 2006 15:2658218
1racism [40 words]an American patriotNov 21, 2006 23:4658218
Muslims X assimilate. [186 words]SANJAYSep 21, 2007 12:3158218
Peace for All around the World [322 words]Waleed El-batatOct 29, 2007 16:5158218
where to begin... [198 words]donvanOct 30, 2007 17:0558218
1Islam and Muslims are innocent (free) of Terrorism [201 words]Waleed El-BatatOct 31, 2007 09:1758218
1True.. [231 words]DONVANNov 1, 2007 09:2058218
might makes right [57 words]jeroen van der mierDec 29, 2007 21:2858218
i m sorry about u:( [129 words]figenJan 15, 2008 05:1558218
YOU ARE CORRECT... [164 words]DONVANJan 15, 2008 16:2258218
THE PROBLEM [135 words]kafurMay 18, 2008 19:3958218
join to father [2879 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh BharatPanthiJan 3, 2011 14:2058218
To whom Israel belongs? [36 words]Russian bear 1987Oct 2, 2014 04:4758218
not asked to be Born as Muslim [325 words]Not askedSep 25, 2006 10:0657449
Iran Jews to wear yellow ribbons, Christians, red ribbons [119 words]ArmageddonMay 19, 2006 20:4745986
1From a Muslim [89 words]SJul 18, 2006 09:5245986
Muslims should stand up to brainwashing techniques [250 words]Horatio NelsonAug 3, 2006 12:2845986
Response to Horatio Nelson [124 words]JustMeAug 4, 2006 12:0845986
What is a 'normal' Muslim? [146 words]JustMeAug 8, 2006 11:0345986
1Are Tamil Tigers Muslims? [40 words]Deepali ChowdhuryAug 15, 2006 10:2345986
It's simple. Please don't try to deny reality. [86 words]JustMeAug 20, 2006 00:1145986
Come on JustMe, I am not a Muslim [89 words]Deepali ChowdhuryAug 21, 2006 09:2445986
Terrorist sympathizer, is that better? [104 words]JustMeAug 21, 2006 16:5145986
Tamil vs. others [118 words]Danish/AmericanSep 12, 2006 23:1145986
Hello Danish/American!! [89 words]JustMeSep 19, 2006 22:2645986
I'm fine JustMe..and you? [225 words]Danish/AmericanSep 20, 2006 19:4445986
For Danish American: TERRORISM [393 words]J DSep 21, 2006 08:5545986
JD...thanks for the links [299 words]Danish/AmericanSep 21, 2006 22:3445986
Brown-Black-Yellow-White-Hindu-Muslim-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist-Arab-European-African-Asian etc. etc. etc [408 words]Deepali ChowdhurySep 22, 2006 11:2745986
LITE killed a whopping TWELVE people??? [360 words]Danish/AmericanSep 22, 2006 16:4845986
The Fiction on Library of Alexander [471 words]EgeMar 19, 2007 19:3345986
to Deepali [76 words]ASJun 20, 2007 16:3645986
LTTE IS LAMB COMPARED TO ISLAM [107 words]sanjaySep 12, 2007 17:4845986
Masters and Followers [161 words]Kandiah KarunakaranApr 18, 2008 22:0445986
TAMIL TIGERS AREN'T TERRORISTS [14 words]yourmomSep 16, 2009 17:5045986
4Life in Denmark [509 words]GeorgeOct 6, 2009 18:4645986
1Sorry but that's not true [159 words]ZekeApr 27, 2010 18:0745986
1What about equality? [323 words]Linda FMay 18, 2006 04:5945863
1what about equality -Linda F [209 words]MandyMay 19, 2006 05:2745863
do you read the holy Quran? [92 words]ariezOct 3, 2006 03:2645863
Have I read the Koran? [255 words]Linda FreedmanOct 3, 2006 15:1945863
MAYBE you do.. [224 words]ariezOct 3, 2006 21:0945863
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [89 words]Linda FreedmanOct 4, 2006 15:3545863
What the "true islam" is why it has "NO ASSET to reform" [229 words]Mohammad JabbarNov 16, 2007 00:1645863
1Danish/American & JustMe: Keep Fighting The Good Fight! [96 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanMay 17, 2006 19:1345834
Abu Qatada: Begging to stay in Britain [244 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanMay 9, 2006 14:5845124
Sword...they have no real power [168 words]Danish/AmericanMay 10, 2006 10:0045124
Weasles [68 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanMay 10, 2006 15:2245124
They kill each other [31 words]Danish/AmericanMay 10, 2006 17:3645124
2British Traditions [75 words]Khalid KhanMar 31, 2010 03:5345124
Begging Bowl [95 words]Sword of IslamApr 1, 2010 08:0145124
Primitive [92 words]Sword of IslamApr 2, 2010 12:1245124
1Sweeden just love Hamas [31 words]BobApr 27, 2006 17:5044360
4more from Sweden [378 words]Danish/AmericanApr 29, 2006 16:1444360
Sweden [53 words]Bombs of America & Babies of IraqApr 29, 2006 17:0744360
I predict a riot [264 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 30, 2006 05:4944360
Living with the enemy [341 words]JustMeApr 30, 2006 09:3844360
Bombs of America & Babies of Iraq [28 words]Danish/AmericanMay 1, 2006 01:1144360
Disgusting entertainment. [375 words]Danish/AmericanMay 1, 2006 09:4944360
Name the enemy or just keep fighting in vacuum [38 words]JaladhiMay 1, 2006 13:5944360
1Danish/American [112 words]JustMeMay 1, 2006 16:0944360
JustMe..sect for serial killers [58 words]Danish/AmericanMay 2, 2006 08:3744360
Iran..big talk for a bunch of cowardly fanatics [162 words]Danish/AmericanMay 2, 2006 16:3044360
How to handle a maniac [126 words]JustMeMay 3, 2006 15:5444360
Love Hamas? [192 words]Dansih/AmericanMay 3, 2006 20:2344360
Disgusting entertainment!Danish/american [143 words]mandyMay 7, 2006 06:0744360
learn from history [95 words]hSep 19, 2006 21:4144360
To Anonymous: I'm back [75 words]ArmgeddonApr 24, 2006 20:1744056
Armgeddon,..the atrocities keep coming daily [399 words]Danish/AmericanApr 25, 2006 19:1944056
1To Danish/American [177 words]JaladhiApr 27, 2006 13:5944056
Muslims in Europe [52 words]RogerSep 20, 2006 11:4544056
Simple question about Mussaui's trial outcome [100 words]Innocent and curiousApr 12, 2006 01:4443001
For Innocent and curious, answers to your questions (and I'm curious too) [225 words]AnonymousApr 12, 2006 05:1143001
1for innocent and curious [271 words]MuslimApr 12, 2006 05:2643001
Innocent and curious, in re: Zacarias Moussaoui [191 words]JustMeApr 12, 2006 21:2243001
Vote for a murderer? Good question, Anonymous! [162 words]JustMeApr 14, 2006 13:1043001
Sword of Islam: Muslims/Jews [101 words]JustMeApr 18, 2006 15:4543001
JustMe..thank you so much! [55 words]Danish/AmericanApr 18, 2006 16:4043001
JustMe [41 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 18, 2006 16:4043001
Moussaoui : Is lunacy his only defence? [57 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 18, 2006 20:3243001
Insanity defense [99 words]JustMeApr 19, 2006 15:5643001
Never forget [252 words]JustMeApr 20, 2006 15:2543001
JustMe: United we stand, divided they fall [444 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 21, 2006 15:3643001
Sword, in re: bravehearts [123 words]JustMeApr 22, 2006 01:0543001
Sword, JustMe and Mandy..someone finally has the backbone to stand up to these aggressors. [297 words]Danish/AmericanApr 25, 2006 23:4643001
1Danish/American Re At last someone with backbone! [241 words]MandyApr 26, 2006 05:5243001
Mandy..you're not the only one disappointed. [185 words]Danish/AmericanApr 26, 2006 19:1543001
Mussaui [34 words]RedMountainHighApr 30, 2006 17:0543001
Moussaoui ... [98 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 30, 2006 18:0543001
Zacarias Moussaoui [97 words]JustMeApr 30, 2006 21:1943001
RE: for innocent and curious [40 words]Solan GundersenJan 23, 2010 17:1543001
Will the Real Sword of Islam please stand up! Morteza read, rhetoric of hate, instigating bigotry, deliberate lies, fake Sword exposed. [4851 words]Sword of TruthApr 11, 2006 12:1742922
Sword of Truth, you did a great job!!!! [123 words]AnonymousApr 11, 2006 16:4242922
Sword of Truth, THANK YOU!!! [157 words]The Real Sword of IslamApr 11, 2006 18:0842922
true [81 words]RonnieApr 11, 2006 19:0142922
My fan club appears to be growing! [312 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 12, 2006 04:4342922
The Plastic Sword of Islam: Delusional [61 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 12, 2006 04:5042922
Ronnie [186 words]JustMeApr 12, 2006 11:3742922
Anonymous [13 words]JustMeApr 12, 2006 11:4142922
Yes JustMe [134 words]MuslimApr 12, 2006 17:4042922
The things we do for peace! [10750 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 12, 2006 18:1342922
The things we do for peace! [29 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 13, 2006 14:5242922
JustMe: Solidarity [122 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 13, 2006 15:2942922
Ronnie [31 words]Danish/AmericanApr 13, 2006 16:5442922
Justme [77 words]AnonymousApr 14, 2006 11:1742922
Muslim [106 words]JustMeApr 14, 2006 12:2642922
Sword of Truth, in re: Truth? [433 words]JustMeApr 15, 2006 13:3442922
Unity with eyes wide open [155 words]JustMeApr 15, 2006 23:1842922
Anonymous - [182 words]PCMadnessApr 17, 2006 21:3242922
2Anonymous, you call this compassion? [148 words]JustMeApr 18, 2006 12:4342922
The list has grown since then [52 words]fersusFeb 28, 2012 18:2142922
JustMe-Danish/American [186 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 8, 2006 19:1542747
2The Danish role during WW2..for those who don't know. [178 words]Danish/AmericanApr 10, 2006 07:2542747
Life is not just about potatoes and gravy... [538 words]SammyApr 5, 2006 19:0242487
Sammy ... [226 words]Sword of IslamApr 6, 2006 19:1642487
Sword of Islam [559 words]SammyApr 7, 2006 20:4642487
Goodbye, Sammy. [220 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 8, 2006 19:0442487
How Typical. [211 words]SammyApr 10, 2006 06:0042487
Sammy..question [208 words]Danish/AmericanApr 10, 2006 15:0242487
Sammy: Get Over It! [193 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 10, 2006 17:1342487
Answer for Danish/American [432 words]SammyApr 10, 2006 17:1342487
Danish/American, what is rotten in Denmark? [356 words]Adib FarakishApr 11, 2006 17:2142487
Sammy [531 words]Danish/AmericanApr 11, 2006 21:0942487
Adib Farakish [367 words]Danish/AmericanApr 12, 2006 06:3642487
" What are the little boys made of?" [268 words]Innocent MumApr 12, 2006 09:1842487
DanishAmerican [293 words]SammyApr 12, 2006 15:1242487
Danish/American [241 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 12, 2006 17:4642487
Sammy.. [363 words]Danish/AmericanApr 12, 2006 21:0242487
Innocent Mum [316 words]Danish/AmericanApr 12, 2006 21:1542487
For Danish/American regarding the Puppets [389 words]Adib FarakishApr 13, 2006 13:5042487
Sword of Islam & The Babies of Beslan on Sammy [27 words]Danish/AmericanApr 13, 2006 15:1842487
Sword of Beid and DanishAmerican [26 words]SammyApr 13, 2006 15:5242487
Sword and Danish/American - Rules of Engagement (Sammy Style) [208 words]JustMeApr 15, 2006 16:3742487
Adib Farakish [102 words]Danish/AmericanApr 16, 2006 00:5942487
Adib ... Now wash your hands! [382 words]PCMadnessApr 16, 2006 21:4242487
JustMe..Sammy style [65 words]Danish/AmericanApr 16, 2006 22:0742487
PC MadnessRe Adib [212 words]MandyApr 17, 2006 05:5942487
Sins of the flesh..... [151 words]PCMadnessApr 18, 2006 16:1842487
Of truth and playboy [357 words]nameApr 19, 2006 07:0342487
name [314 words]Danish/AmericanApr 19, 2006 15:5342487
Danish/American - lol [135 words]JustMeApr 19, 2006 16:1442487
name or no name.... it's rubbish! [1105 words]PCMadnessApr 19, 2006 16:5442487
name [248 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 19, 2006 17:2242487
Othello vs 'name' [190 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanApr 19, 2006 19:2942487
Name Re Nudity in the West. [209 words]MandyApr 20, 2006 10:1942487
Nudists everywhere!! [64 words]JustMeApr 20, 2006 16:1342487
is this a rosie or oprah site ? [79 words]ronJun 30, 2007 17:2742487

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)