69 million page views

Bob Grayson

Reader comment on item: West Africa - Europe's New Border
in response to reader comment: immigration

Submitted by Octavio Johanson (Italy), May 26, 2006 at 19:20

Yes, you have got it Bob Grayson! It is nothing to do with tolerance, diversity or multi-culturalism. It is all to do with economic interests. Europe needs oil from the Muslim world, and that is why we allow them to come over here, without asking too many questions. Then, we need cheap labour. Mexamerica is based on, more or less, the same concepts. American companies have interests in Mexico; furthermore, Latinos become cheap labour in the USA. It has never had anything to do with racial tolerance. Europe and Britain see Muslim immigrants as easy to exploit. The media is in favour of open-borders. Politicians and business people are pro open-borders. The European Union is pro open borders. NAFTA is about open borders. West Africa is Europe's new border. It is really a non-border. Cheap labour, economic agreements, oil and raw materials: that is what lies behind the open-borders policy. Forget about diversity and multi-culturalism. That is just rhetoric. In Europe, Le Monde supports open-borders; in the USA, it is the Wall Street Journal. These people want cheap labour to exploit as slaves. They want to be able to exploit the Third World, empty out their countries, take their oil and resources. And dump all their poor here, in the West.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (28) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
inaccuracies [170 words]la chica k trabaja con gentes sin papelesMay 29, 2010 17:16173511
I agree [68 words]S. AnguilarAug 5, 2006 23:3351759
Differences between Europe and the USA [96 words]Octavio JohansonMar 26, 2006 11:1241409
Octavio - that is changing [827 words]SiddaMar 28, 2006 18:3741409
Sidda: that's a no-win situation [221 words]Octavio JohansonMar 29, 2006 01:4341409
More feedback for Sidda [134 words]Octavio JohansonMar 29, 2006 10:0041409
to Octavio [575 words]SiddaMar 29, 2006 17:4141409
I am not a conservative either! [504 words]Octavio JohansonMar 30, 2006 01:2841409
Conclusions [384 words]Octavio JohansonMar 30, 2006 03:0641409
immigration [77 words]bob graysonApr 12, 2006 00:0741409
Re: immigration [69 words]Octavio JohansonApr 12, 2006 08:0241409
Bob Grayson [211 words]Octavio JohansonMay 26, 2006 19:2041409
The I-word [71 words]Octavio JohansonMar 25, 2006 18:2541367
This is madness! [74 words]Wayne WagnerMar 20, 2006 15:4840826
Your readers and me [99 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 01:5540757
I live in Spain [75 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 05:3140757
Brother Octavio , Its hard to follow the rules sometimes !! [170 words]SinghDec 6, 2006 13:3240757
how to solve the Canary Island problem [278 words]MarkMar 20, 2006 00:3540755
Oh, Australia! [223 words]Octavio JohansonMar 20, 2006 04:4440755
I also live in Spain, further more I'm Spanish [98 words]Gonzalo MayordomoMar 26, 2006 11:3540755
Gonzalo [17 words]Octavio JohansonMar 27, 2006 03:5040755
Point 3 is no solution [231 words]Farid H.Apr 6, 2006 14:0940755
EU-camps not possible [85 words]MikeApr 28, 2006 06:5340755
Sorting the canary island problem [98 words]rienMay 13, 2006 09:0740755
Immigration is necessary for development but Muslim Immigrants are Threat to Europe [61 words]BillooDec 6, 2006 13:1040755
South Africa has the same problem [218 words]Josh SmithApr 13, 2007 23:2040755
1The problem of illegal migration [323 words]Mary ConnorDec 3, 2007 22:0940755
right [8 words]Einsten SpearsJan 11, 2009 22:5840755

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Bob Grayson by Octavio Johanson

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)