Regarding Pro-Palestian Conference on divestment of Israeli investments

Submitted by Roger Ellis (United States), Oct 12, 2002 at 06:26

The divestment conference (Pro-Palestinian) at the University of Michigan this weekend will promulgate only one view: that Israel has committed genocide, perpetuates occupation against the Palestinians and that America is wrong in everything she does.

However, Muslims turn a 'blind eye' on their own genocides: I have one example....
Although about 2,000 or so Islamic Palestinian lives have been lost through the intifada, suicide bombings are worth more!

When Muslims slaughter more than 2 million Sudanese Christians and enslave 150,000+ (mostly children and women), cut off clean water and food supplies, and carpet bomb villages in Christian southern Sudan, isn't that hypocrisy?

There far more disturbing atrocities going on in the Muslims' quest for 'the supreme' Islamic caliphate, in the name of Mohammed and Allah!

Recent links:
http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/278/oped/Why_Israel_and_not_Sudan_is_singled_out+.shtml
http://www.africa-crisis.org/
http://www.sudan.net/news/news.html

These are just a few, there are many links to Sudan Islamic persecution sites and this is just one of many other countries being abused by Islamism.

Apparently the big 4 islamic oil companies want any and all that oil, if it means the annihilation of Christian southern Sudan. Egypt and Saudi support and fund the genocide along with neighboring Islamic countries. US has a finger on that oil in the Sudan also, but who do you think will gain control after we assist in the development?
Ivory Coast, Nigeria and many others are being incited to demand Islamist control.

Where is the outrage from SAFE and other similar organizations to mobilize a divestment conference on Islamic companies supporting genocide and annihilation of non-Muslims?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".