Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Response to Asim
Reader comment on item: Symposium: The Showdown [with Iran]

Submitted by No dhimmi (United States), Aug 8, 2005 at 00:34

Asim,

"You wonder why there are bombings in the West when people... advocate regime change and force countries to "engage in attrition".

What country (ies) is being forced into attrition by the West.....Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia? Iraq, yes, but wasn't Saddam's regime one of the "oppressive" type of regimes in the middle east that the Islamists talk about?

Does your objection apply to the Islamists who are trying to destabilize Iraq so they can impose their form of Islam? Does it apply to the Taliban?

"Thats why they hate the west- for the way they are treated. You harm them they will no doubt find ways of harming you."

If the West left the middle east and if the Palestinian-Isreali conflict was resolved, the bombings and other acts of terrorism would not cease. The real reason is restore Islam as a world force, the restoration of the Caliphate, world domination, and sharia as the only rule of law.

"The Iranians if treated like equals like they ought to be, would be no hinderance to the West."

Why should the US treat Iranians like equals when our Embassy staff was held hostage; US citizens held hostage in Beirut; death to America is a constant rant in demonstrations; and the new President says that Islam will rule every mountain.

In addition, it has consistently lied to the IAEC. It is styming negotiations with the Europeans on it's nuclear energy activties.

What reason does the United States have to trust the Iranian regime?

No Dhimmi

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
iranian situation [168 words]nick wrightAug 15, 2005 02:56
Iran already has nuclear weapons [357 words]Norm GrantAug 11, 2005 21:46
⇒ Response to Asim [250 words]No dhimmiAug 8, 2005 00:34
Further Comment [313 words]Peter J. HerzAug 7, 2005 01:45
Answer to Asim [389 words]WernerAug 3, 2005 22:28
Answer to Iran [176 words]Tony AAug 3, 2005 20:57
Monty islamists are after epople like you [108 words]Asim AhmedAug 3, 2005 19:25
no nuclear war -Iran already has bomb [259 words]haydarJan 8, 2006 21:44
Soft power [277 words]WernerAug 1, 2005 20:12
USA – playing for the mullahs! [127 words]John MAug 1, 2005 19:47
Soft-Power Works and Is Cost Effective [98 words]GWAug 1, 2005 15:32
Iranian Quagmire [88 words]John MAug 1, 2005 07:46
Disposition of the Military [78 words]MontyJul 31, 2005 11:39
Iran--stay out [249 words]Peter J. HerzJul 31, 2005 10:08
MAD makes sense [64 words]WJ HalversonJan 26, 2006 23:55
Shias & Sunnis [172 words]michael cJul 31, 2005 06:35
Which option [391 words]WernerJul 30, 2005 22:31
Israel's role? [109 words]Yehoshua ZellerJul 30, 2005 19:31

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page