Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Answer to Iran
Reader comment on item: Symposium: The Showdown [with Iran]

Submitted by Tony A (Singapore), Aug 3, 2005 at 20:57

One day and BANG, there goes a portion of Israel. Do you trust the mullahs with nuclear bombs? Prevention is still better than cure. The jihadists' philosopy is first to hit then talk. What's takkiya to Moslems? It's sanctioned by Allah. Answer - bluff & confuse the infidels with theatrics & rhetorics; before and after a castrophe. That's why London is still debating. I would have thought it ended at New York and Madrid. It has been shown one simply can't talk sense to jihadists. After New York, come Madrid, then London. Where next? The West has got to respond spiritually. Take a leaf from the Koran. Warn them, like it or not, if you hit any Western cities again, whatever bombs that descend upon any Islamic countries that harbour and quietly despatch tjhe jihadists... will be dealt with They will protest and pretend that they aren't scared but I tell you the chills that run down their spines will cause paralysis in their warped minds. You see they know defiled bodies sent out hell-seeking souls.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (18) on this item

Title By Date
iranian situation [168 words]nick wrightAug 15, 2005 02:56
Iran already has nuclear weapons [357 words]Norm GrantAug 11, 2005 21:46
Response to Asim [250 words]No dhimmiAug 8, 2005 00:34
Further Comment [313 words]Peter J. HerzAug 7, 2005 01:45
Answer to Asim [389 words]WernerAug 3, 2005 22:28
⇒ Answer to Iran [176 words]Tony AAug 3, 2005 20:57
Monty islamists are after epople like you [108 words]Asim AhmedAug 3, 2005 19:25
no nuclear war -Iran already has bomb [259 words]haydarJan 8, 2006 21:44
Soft power [277 words]WernerAug 1, 2005 20:12
USA – playing for the mullahs! [127 words]John MAug 1, 2005 19:47
Soft-Power Works and Is Cost Effective [98 words]GWAug 1, 2005 15:32
Iranian Quagmire [88 words]John MAug 1, 2005 07:46
Disposition of the Military [78 words]MontyJul 31, 2005 11:39
Iran--stay out [249 words]Peter J. HerzJul 31, 2005 10:08
MAD makes sense [64 words]WJ HalversonJan 26, 2006 23:55
Shias & Sunnis [172 words]michael cJul 31, 2005 06:35
Which option [391 words]WernerJul 30, 2005 22:31
Israel's role? [109 words]Yehoshua ZellerJul 30, 2005 19:31

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page