Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Looking for new recruits
Reader comment on item: The California Suicide Bomber[: Ra'ed Mansour al-Banna]

Submitted by John (United States), Apr 5, 2005 at 15:43

I have many disagreements with Mr. Pipes in this article, but I know that he just wants Islamists to stop killing innocent people. He is frustrated by the Islamic world's acceptance of suicide-based terrorism, even against other muslims.

In my opinion it is much more unacceptable to be undisturbed by this culture of violence or to deny it exists. Terrorism's main goal is to commit atrocities and have the victim of that terrorism blamed for the results. It is very successful among the Islamic population and liberal/leftwing westerners.

One response to this article stated, "Is there any evidence that this Banna guy was ever an Islamist or in association with them before 2003 when he went to Jordan?"

I would have to say that is the problem, there was no evidence. I am glad that he was caught lying on his Visa application and was denied entry into my country. Someone doesnt just blow themself up because they didnt get want they want. It takes a childhood of anti-semitic brainwashing, years of frustration and the slow unnoticed buildup of a serious mental disorder to reach that point.

Before coming to America Mr. Banna obtained a law degree and attempted to practice law in Jordan. He law practice failed and he came to the US where he worked in a factory and other menial jobs. This man had alot of built up anger and Islamists have given him an easy path to vent. His friends and family said that Mr. Banna seemed happy and well adjusted. He was keeping it all inside and was a ticking timebomb.

In the Arab and western media, the blame for Mr. Banna's actions inevitably falls on the US. Without questioning such tactics as suicide bombings and civilian massacres, that could be a logical answer. But perhaps Mr. Banna and al Qaeda are responsible for their own actions. It is possible that there is no justifable pretext for these actions and that the problem lies elsewhere.

Now is the time to ask some hard questions. What are the effects of generations of Islamic teachings that preach hatred against Infidels? How can this culture of violence be stopped? How can terrorism be stopped in the future? Will the success of terrorism lead to peace? Why do well educated westerners support Iraqi, Palestinian and al Qaeda terrorism against civilians under the guise of "resistance"? Why do I even have to ask these questions, isnt the answer obvious?

Is it time to stop the spread of hatred in the textbooks of the Islamic world? In mosques? In the newspapers? On TV? Why is it sometimes considered bigoted to speak out against such hatred? These are important questions that are not being asked enough in our society.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (34) on this item

Title By Date
Answer to Mumbai [323 words]Arlinda DeAngelisApr 26, 2005 08:17
Why does this not happen in other religions? [146 words]Yldaed SurivApr 15, 2005 15:09
How much Islam is responsible for creating terrorists [27 words]A.AhmedApr 13, 2005 11:47
The article [323 words]AllenApr 10, 2005 11:21
The problem with that formula [127 words]Emmanuel ParelloApr 8, 2005 13:37
How come the family did not know about their son? [623 words]N. KhalediApr 7, 2005 21:59
Fodder for a teddy boy [196 words]Donald OApr 7, 2005 21:17
Why does a normal Muslim turn into a terrorist? [20 words]Ayesha A.Apr 7, 2005 13:02
Honesty [79 words]S.C.PandaApr 6, 2005 05:54
Missing the wood for the trees [417 words]Ghulam Muhammed, MumbaiApr 6, 2005 00:57
⇒ Looking for new recruits [451 words]JohnApr 5, 2005 15:43
Australian model: Sure, but.... [150 words]JB TantApr 5, 2005 14:21
Preview of things to come......... [228 words]Warren BaconApr 5, 2005 12:56
The guy was a crackpot... [378 words]Nabil AhmadApr 5, 2005 12:02
Friend or Foe?? [211 words]Rebecca E. MouldsApr 5, 2005 12:01
Probably recruited while still in Jordan [88 words]Richard ConoboyApr 5, 2005 11:20
Strange Biography [152 words]WernerApr 5, 2005 00:05
Why are Muslims so obsessed with "honor"? [98 words]Funk Soul BruhvaApr 4, 2005 23:29
Apropos muslim immigrants who become jihadists [218 words]Gabriel RinzlerApr 4, 2005 22:52
So what if someone who hated us passed through? [217 words]Peter J. HerzApr 4, 2005 21:59
Jihadis [59 words]Donald W. BalesApr 4, 2005 19:58
To Error is Human, to Kill is Martydom [69 words]Chris KApr 4, 2005 19:52
Or, perhaps, a distraught man? [198 words]G. LobeApr 4, 2005 18:58
The case for immigration control: the Australian model
[w/response] [188 words]
Octavio JohansonApr 4, 2005 17:50
The Australian immigration-system [18 words]JAFeb 18, 2006 19:21
Australian immigration policies [58 words]KevinJan 2, 2009 20:11
Great Details and Analysis [79 words]AlexApr 4, 2005 17:17
What are we looking for? [91 words]Marcy GlanzApr 4, 2005 16:59
The California Suicide Bomber and Cognitive dissonance [126 words]Stan FuttermanApr 4, 2005 16:05
Credibility
[w/response] [126 words]
David PintoApr 4, 2005 15:57
Another brick in the wall [89 words]Darwin BarrettApr 4, 2005 15:57
Islam a Jihadist religion [194 words]Gloria StewartApr 4, 2005 15:16
SLEEPERS'S TACTICS [192 words]Marcos BerensteinApr 4, 2005 14:53
Where are the real America Moslims? [31 words]JP ArcherJun 1, 2006 12:50

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page