34 readers online now

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

Saving things
Reader comment on article: Arafat's Last Threat to Israel?

Submitted by Ilona Melstrads (United States), Nov 10, 2004 at 21:03

If you are right and Bush is in a box because of his statements or policies, the period of Palestinian anarchy and the implied U.S. pressure against Israel, if "inevitable," can be turned somewhat to the advantage of peace. This would be through the infiltration of the various Palestinian organizations and the creation of leaders. One may always hope that among the Arabs, someone, given enough resources, may rise to the occasion.

My father, who had to flee both the Nazis and the Soviet Communists, had no explanation for Gorbachev except the humorous one that Gorbachev might have been a CIA agent!

The current period in the Middle East resembles the time of Elizabeth I, and the dreadfully precarious position of Protestants throughout Europe against the most tremendous Catholic persecutions and armies. The country with the best spy network and basically in the Protestant camp, England, although frequently backsliding, particularly for financial reasons, won the first major initial battle.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title By Date

Arafat and the U.S. [35 words]

Muhammad Siddiqui Nov 17, 2004 02:14

Lasting threat [83 words]

Dan Katcher Nov 16, 2004 09:04

After Arafat [81 words]

Charles A. Lawson, II Nov 11, 2004 15:20

Demand a Complete Destruction of Terror from Palestinians [193 words]

Ross Stevens Nov 10, 2004 22:35

⇒ Saving things [158 words]

Ilona Melstrads Nov 10, 2004 21:03

Arafat's death [60 words]

Bob Nov 10, 2004 18:05

It's not what Bush should do or say. [76 words]

Tom Pensyl Nov 10, 2004 13:20

False treaties of Hubidaya [41 words]

dennisw Nov 10, 2004 11:48

Your article is full of wisdom and knowledge [71 words]

Vincent Meijer Nov 10, 2004 04:52

Consistency? [75 words]

Yale Zussman Nov 10, 2004 01:48

Arafat is dead. Now, let's kill his myths [114 words]

Salomon Benzimra Nov 10, 2004 01:40

The Arabs in Palestine [183 words]

Arlinda DeAngelis Nov 9, 2004 17:15

Your article is exactly on target. [56 words]

Frances Schwartzwald Nov 9, 2004 17:14

East & West Palestine [113 words]

Hulegu Khan Nov 9, 2004 16:31

Bush is vulnerable to his own vanity [113 words]

Ray Davidson Nov 9, 2004 15:45

No Peace [44 words]

Joseph Prosise Nov 9, 2004 14:46

Fairy Land [180 words]

Brian Lux Nov 9, 2004 13:57

Ominous Development [14 words]

Sol Shalit Nov 9, 2004 13:36

Everyone has missed the boat [172 words]

Stephen Berman Nov 9, 2004 13:33

The First Rule of Peace... [167 words]

Israel Nov 9, 2004 12:57

Islam is the "fly in the ointment." [50 words]

John Berg Nov 9, 2004 12:37

PLO leader: There is no Palestinian nation; it is an invention to destroy Israel! [208 words]

Michael Green Nov 9, 2004 11:28

Time to Push for the Jordanian Option [72 words]

Michael Green Nov 9, 2004 10:42

Arafat was just a part of the problem [292 words]

Kenneth S. Besig Nov 9, 2004 10:10

Jordan [50 words]

Jonathan Usher Nov 9, 2004 09:01

"Palestinian Arabs" [50 words]

Ruth D. Shapiro Nov 9, 2004 08:43

A Scary Thought [165 words]

Peter J. Herz Nov 9, 2004 08:26

Comment on Arafat's Last Threat to Israel?

Name
Email Address (optional)

Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments
Comments:

Mark my comment as a response to Saving things by reader Ilona Melstrads

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited, before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments.

Click here to see the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS